J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31(05): 378-383
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546294
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Safety of the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap in the Setting of Neck Dissection and Radiation Therapy

Shantanu N. Razdan
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
,
Claudia R. Albornoz
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
,
Teresa Ro
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
,
Peter G. Cordeiro
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
,
Joseph J. Disa
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
,
Colleen M. McCarthy
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
,
Carrie S. Stern
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York
,
Evan S. Garfein
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York
,
Evan Matros
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 November 2014

04 January 2015

Publication Date:
13 March 2015 (online)

Abstract

Background The supraclavicular artery island flap (SAIF) has recently been repopularized as a versatile and reliable option for reconstruction of oncological head and neck defects. Prior ipsilateral neck dissection or irradiation is considered a relative contraindication to its use. The aim of this study was to describe the safety and utility of the SAIF for head and neck reconstruction in the setting of neck dissection and radiation.

Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive SAIF reconstructions at two institutions between May 2011 and 2014. In addition to demographic data, comorbidities, indications, surgical characteristics, data about radiation treatment, and neck dissection were specifically recorded. Donor and recipient site complications were noted. Fisher exact test was performed to analyze if neck dissection or radiation were associated with complications.

Results A total of 22 patients underwent SAIF reconstruction for an array of head and neck defects. Donor site infection was noted in one patient. Recipient site complications included, wound dehiscence (n = 2), orocutaneous fistula (n = 1), carotid blowout (n = 1), and total flap loss (n = 1). There was no association between prior neck dissection or radiation treatment and flap loss (p = 1.00).

Conclusion The SAIF is safe for use in patients who have had an ipsilateral neck dissection involving level IV or V lymph nodes and/or radiation treatment to the neck. It can be used alone or in combination with other flaps for closure of a variety of head and neck defects.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chiu ES, Liu PH, Baratelli R, Lee MY, Chaffin AE, Friedlander PL. Circumferential pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a supraclavicular artery island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (1) 161-166
  • 2 Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (1) 115-123
  • 3 Levy JM, Eko FN, Hilaire HS, Friedlander PL, Melgar MA, Chiu ES. Posterolateral skull base reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (5) 1751-1754
  • 4 Emerick KS, Herr MW, Lin DT, Santos F, Deschler DG. Supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of complex parotidectomy, lateral skull base, and total auriculectomy defects. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 140 (9) 861-866
  • 5 Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK. The supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: applications and limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (11) 1247-1255
  • 6 Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for head and neck reconstruction: surgical technique and refinements. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (6) 933-940
  • 7 Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB. Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) vs free fasciocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (6) 941-948
  • 8 Pallua N, Wolter TP. Defect classification and reconstruction algorithm for patients with tracheostomy using the tunneled supraclavicular artery island flap. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395 (8) 1115-1119
  • 9 Vinh VQ, Ogawa R, Van Anh T, Hyakusoku H. Reconstruction of neck scar contractures using supraclavicular flaps: retrospective study of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (1) 130-135
  • 10 Nthumba PM. The supraclavicular artery flap: a versatile flap for neck and orofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (8) 1997-2004
  • 11 Razdan SN, Ro T, Albornoz CR, Bilsky MH, Matros E. Case report of a supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of a nonhealing cervical spine wound. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; (epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393693
  • 12 Adams AS, Wright MJ, Johnston S , et al. The use of multislice CT angiography preoperative study for supraclavicular artery island flap harvesting. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (3) 312-315
  • 13 Teo KG, Rozen WM, Acosta R. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (7) 449-456
  • 14 Chao JW, Spector JA, Taylor EM , et al. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap versus free fasciocutaneous flap for reconstruction of partial hypopharyngeal defects: What should we be doing?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; (epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395417
  • 15 Yu P, Selber J, Liu J. Reciprocal dominance of the anterolateral and anteromedial thigh flap perforator anatomy. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (6) 714-716