Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75(06): 588-596
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546149
Original Article
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Hormone Therapy and its Effect on the Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients

Hormonersatztherapie und ihr Effekt auf die Prognose bei Brustkrebspatientinnen
C. Rauh   *
1   University Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen
,
F. Schuetz   *
2   Breast Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital
,
B. Rack
3   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Campus Innenstadt University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich
,
E. Stickeler
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg
,
M. Klar
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg
,
M. Orlowska-Volk
5   Institute of Pathology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg
,
M. Windfuhr-Blum
6   Department of Radiology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg
,
J. Heil
2   Breast Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital
,
J. Rom
2   Breast Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital
,
C. Sohn
2   Breast Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital
,
U. Andergassen
3   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Campus Innenstadt University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich
,
J. Jueckstock
3   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Campus Innenstadt University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich
,
T. Fehm
7   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf
,
C. R. Loehberg
1   University Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen
,
A. Hein
1   University Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen
,
R. Schulz-Wendtland
9   Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Breast Center, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen
,
A. Hartmann
8   Institute of Pathology, University Breast Center, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen
,
M. W. Beckmann
1   University Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen
,
W. Janni
10   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm
,
P. A. Fasching
1   University Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen
11   Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, USA
,
L. Häberle
1   University Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center EMN, Erlangen
12   Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 02. Mai 2015
revised 02. Mai 2015

accepted 19. Mai 2015

Publikationsdatum:
03. Juli 2015 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Introduction: Use of hormone therapy (HT) has declined dramatically in recent years. Some studies have reported that HT use before a diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) may be a prognostic factor in postmenopausal patients. This study aimed to examine the prognostic relevance of HT use before BC diagnosis.

Methods: Four BC cohort studies in Germany were pooled, and 4492 postmenopausal patients with HT use data were identified. Patient data and tumor characteristics were compared between users and nonusers, along with overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Cox proportional hazards models were stratified by study center and adjusted for age at diagnosis, tumor stage, grading, nodal status, and hormone receptors.

Results: Women with HT use before the diagnosis of BC were more likely to have a lower tumor stage, to be estrogen receptor–negative, and to have a lower grading. With regard to prognosis there were effects seen for OS, DMFS and LRFS, specifically in the subgroup of women with a positive hormone receptor. In these subgroups, BC patients had a better prognosis with previous HT use.

Conclusions: HT use before a diagnosis of BC is associated with a more favorable prognosis in women with a positive hormone receptor status. It may be recommended that the prognostic factor HT should be documented and analyzed as a confounder for prognosis in studies of postmenopausal hormone-responsive breast cancers.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Der Einsatz einer menopausalen Hormonersatztherapie (HT) hat in den letzten Jahren deutlich abgenommen. Einige kleinere Studien konnten zeigen, dass der Gebrauch vor der Diagnose eines Brustkrebses (BC) ein prognostischer Faktor bei postmenopausalen Patientinnen darstellt. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, die prognostische Relevanz des Hormontherapie-Gebrauchs vor Brustkrebsdiagnose zu untersuchen. Methoden: Vier Kohortenstudien mit Brustkrebspatientinnen aus Deutschland wurden zusammengefügt, und 4492 postmenopausale Patientinnen, zu denen Daten zum HT Gebrauch vorliegen, konnten identifiziert werden. Patientinnen- und Tumorcharakteristika wurden zwischen Patientinnen mit HT zum Diagnosezeitpunkt und Patientinnen ohne HT-Einnahme zum Diagnosezeitpunkt verglichen, zusätzlich das Gesamtüberleben (OS), das fernmetastasenfreie Überleben (DMFS) und das lokalrezidivfreie Überleben (LRFS). Cox-Modelle wurden nach Studienzentren stratifiziert und für Alter bei Diagnose, Tumorstadium, Grading, Nodalstatus und Hormonrezeptorstatus adjustiert. Ergebnisse: Patientinnen, welche eine HT vor Brustkrebsdiagnose eingenommen hatten, wurden eher mit einem niedrigeren Tumorstadium, einem östrogenrezeptornegativen Tumor und einem niedrigeren Grading diagnostiziert. In Bezug auf die Prognose konnten Effekte bezüglich des OS, DMFS und LRFS, im speziellen in der Subgruppe der Frauen mit einem hormonrezeptorpositiven Tumor gezeigt werden. In diesen Subgruppen hatten Brustkrebspatientinnen, welche zuvor eine HT eingenommen hatten, eine bessere Prognose.

Key words

breast cancer - hormone therapy - hormone receptors - prognosis

Schlüsselwörter

Brustkrebs - Hormontherapie - Hormonrezeptoren - Prognose

* These authors contributed equally to this study.


 

  • References

  • 1 Lux MP, Maass N, Schutz F et al. Breast cancer 2013 – interpretation of new and known data. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2013; 73: 584-598
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Katalinic A. Epidemiology of breast cancer – current figures and trends. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2013; 73: 130-135
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rauh C, Gass P, Heusinger K et al. Association of molecular subtypes with breast cancer risk factors: a case-only analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev 2014; DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000111.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Fasching PA, Ekici AB, Adamietz BR et al. Breast cancer risk – genes, environment and clinics. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2011; 71: 1056-1066
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fasching PA, Ekici AB, Wachter DL et al. Breast cancer risk – from genetics to molecular understanding of pathogenesis. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2013; 73: 1228-1235
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Althuis MD, Fergenbaum JH, Garcia-Closas M et al. Etiology of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13: 1558-1568
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Hess KR, Pusztai L, Buzdar AU et al. Estrogen receptors and distinct patterns of breast cancer relapse. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003; 78: 105-118
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Yang XR, Chang-Claude J, Goode EL et al. Associations of breast cancer risk factors with tumor subtypes: a pooled analysis from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 250-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haberle L et al. Association of mammographic density with hormone receptors in invasive breast cancers: Results from a case-only study. Int J Cancer 2012; 131: 2643-2649
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC et al. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1179-1189
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Broeks A, Schmidt MK, Sherman ME et al. Low penetrance breast cancer susceptibility loci are associated with specific breast tumor subtypes: findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Hum Mol Genet 2011; 20: 3289-3303
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Milne RL, Benitez J, Nevanlinna H et al. Risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer and single-nucleotide polymorphism 2q35-rs13387042. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101: 1012-1018
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stevens KN, Vachon CM, Lee AM et al. Common breast cancer susceptibility loci are associated with triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2011; 71: 6240-6249
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stevens KN, Fredericksen Z, Vachon CM et al. 19p13.1 is a triple-negative-specific breast cancer susceptibility locus. Cancer Res 2012; 72: 1795-1803
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fasching PA, Pharoah PD, Cox A et al. The role of genetic breast cancer susceptibility variants as prognostic factors. Hum Mol Genet 2012; 21: 3926-3939
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Beral V. Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 2003; 362: 419-427
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Chlebowski RT, Kuller LH, Prentice RL et al. Breast cancer after use of estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 573-587
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 1997; 350: 1047-1059
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Womenʼs Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 321-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ursin G, Tseng CC, Paganini-Hill A et al. Does menopausal hormone replacement therapy interact with known factors to increase risk of breast cancer?. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 699-706
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stahlberg C, Pedersen AT, Andersen ZJ et al. Breast cancer with different prognostic characteristics developing in Danish women using hormone replacement therapy. Br J Cancer 2004; 91: 644-650
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Holli K, Isola J, Cuzick J. Low biologic aggressiveness in breast cancer in women using hormone replacement therapy. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3115-3120
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Gass M et al. Breast cancer outcome and estrogen plus progestin use in postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol 2010; Suppl.: Abstr. 1507
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Schairer C, Gail M, Byrne C et al. Estrogen replacement therapy and breast cancer survival in a large screening study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 264-270
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bonnier P, Bessenay F, Sasco AJ et al. Impact of menopausal hormone-replacement therapy on clinical and laboratory characteristics of breast cancer. Int J Cancer 1998; 79: 278-282
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Esteve J, Seradour B, Jacquemier J et al. Does a better grade of tumour occurring in women under hormone replacement therapy compensate for their lower probability of detection by screening mammography. J Med Screen 2002; 9: 70-73
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Daling JR, Malone KE, Doody DR et al. Association of regimens of hormone replacement therapy to prognostic factors among women diagnosed with breast cancer aged 50–64 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 1175-1181
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Fletcher AS, Erbas B, Kavanagh AM et al. Use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and survival following breast cancer diagnosis. Breast 2005; 14: 192-200
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bergkvist L, Adami HO, Persson I et al. Prognosis after breast cancer diagnosis in women exposed to estrogen and estrogen-progestogen replacement therapy. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 130: 221-228
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Rosenberg LU, Granath F, Dickman PW et al. Menopausal hormone therapy in relation to breast cancer characteristics and prognosis: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 2008; 10: R78
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sellers TA, Mink PJ, Cerhan JR et al. The role of hormone replacement therapy in the risk for breast cancer and total mortality in women with a family history of breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 973-980
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Schuetz F, Diel IJ, Pueschel M et al. Reduced incidence of distant metastases and lower mortality in 1072 patients with breast cancer with a history of hormone replacement therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 342.e1-342.e9
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Marshall SF, Chang E, Clarke CA et al. Hormone therapy use before diagnosis and breast cancer survival in the California teachers study. Cancer Res 2009; 69: Abstract #65
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Beckmann MW, Brucker C, Hanf V et al. Quality assured health care in certified breast centers and improvement of the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Onkologie 2011; 34: 362-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Harrell jr. FE, Lee KL, Pollock BG. Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988; 80: 1198-1202
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: application to the Cox regression model. Stat Med 1992; 11: 2093-2109
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Simon R, Altman DG. Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncology. Br J Cancer 1994; 69: 979-985
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994; 81: 515-526
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Chambless LE, Diao G. Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction. Stat Med 2006; 25: 3474-3486
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gronnesby JK, Borgan O. A method for checking regression models in survival analysis based on the risk score. Lifetime Data Anal 1996; 2: 315-328
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 May S, Hosmer DW. A simplified method of calculating an overall goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model. Lifetime Data Anal 1998; 4: 109-120
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Fowble B, Hanlon A, Freedman G et al. Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: effect on diagnosis and outcome in early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1680-1688
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Rosenberg LU, Einarsdottir K, Friman EI et al. Risk factors for hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 2482-2488
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Yuen J, Persson I, Bergkvist L et al. Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer mortality in Swedish women: results after adjustment for ‘healthy drug-user’ effect. Cancer Causes Control 1993; 4: 369-374
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Gass M et al. Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women. JAMA 2010; 304: 1684-1692
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Womenʼs Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1701-1712
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Salmen J, Neugebauer J, Fasching PA et al. Pooled analysis of the prognostic relevance of progesterone receptor status in five German cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 148: 143-151
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 48 van der Leij F, Elkhuizen PH, Bartelink H et al. Predictive factors for local recurrence in breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2012; 22: 100-107
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N et al. The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1670-1674
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Katalinic A, Stegmaier C, Rawal R et al. Less hormone replacement therapy, less breast cancer in Germany?. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2007; 67: 1217-1221
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Baum M, Budzar AU, Cuzick J et al. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2131-2139
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Thurlimann B, Keshaviah A, Coates AS et al. A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2747-2757
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar