Am J Perinatol 2015; 32(05): 487-496
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396693
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Optimal Timing for Term Delivery of Twin Pregnancies: A Population-Based Study

Gustavo A. Vilchez
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
,
Jing Dai
2   C.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
,
Luis R. Hoyos
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
,
Anushka Chelliah
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
,
Ray Bahado-Singh
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
,
Robert J. Sokol
2   C.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 June 2014

02 October 2014

Publication Date:
29 December 2014 (online)

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to examine the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes after twin delivery according to gestational age.

Materials and Methods The U.S. Natality Database from 2007 to 2010 was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were twin deliveries and gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks. Exclusion criteria were congenital anomalies and missing/incomplete data. Cases were subdivided by gestational age into early term, term, and late term. Singleton pregnancies matched by delivery time and location were selected as controls. Outcome variables included were low Apgar score, assisted ventilation, neonatal intensive care unit admission, surfactant/antibiotic use, seizures, and birth injury. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios according to gestational age and plurality, using singleton term as reference.

Results A total of 220,169 twin and 270,540 singleton deliveries were identified. The risk of adverse neonatal outcomes for twins was higher than for singletons. For twins, the distribution of the risks of the composite of adverse neonatal outcomes was linear, being the lowest at early term and the highest at late term, whereas the distribution for singletons was u-shaped being lowest at term compared with early and late term.

Conclusions Twins are at higher risk of suboptimal neonatal outcomes than singletons, but do better when delivered at early term rather than term or late term.

 
  • References

  • 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ , et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011; 60 (1) 1-70
  • 2 Cheung YB, Yip P, Karlberg J. Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152 (12) 1107-1116
  • 3 Dodd JM, Robinson JS, Crowther CA, Chan A. Stillbirth and neonatal outcomes in South Australia, 1991-2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (6) 1731-1736
  • 4 Hartley RS, Emanuel I, Hitti J. Perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity rates among twin pairs at different gestational ages: optimal delivery timing at 37 to 38 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184 (3) 451-458
  • 5 Kahn B, Lumey LH, Zybert PA , et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 (4) 685-692
  • 6 Minakami H, Kimura H, Honma Y, Tamada T, Sato I. When is the optimal time for delivery?—Purely from the fetuses' perspective. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1995; 40 (3) 174-178
  • 7 Minakami H, Sato I. Reestimating date of delivery in multifetal pregnancies. JAMA 1996; 275 (18) 1432-1434
  • 8 National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Induction of Labour. London, UK: NICE Clinical Guideline; 2008
  • 9 Delaney M, Roggensack A, Leduc DC , et al; Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee; Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee. Guidelines for the management of pregnancy at 41+0 to 42+0 weeks. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30 (9) 800-823
  • 10 Gülmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Heatley E. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 6: CD004945
  • 11 National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Multiple Pregnancy: the Management of Twin and Triplet Pregnancies in the Antenatal Period. London, UK: NICE Clinical Guideline; 2011
  • 12 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144: Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (5) 1118-1132
  • 13 Bakr AF, Karkour T. What is the optimal gestational age for twin delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2006; 6: 3
  • 14 Dodd JM, Crowther CA. Elective delivery of women with a twin pregnancy from 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (1) CD003582
  • 15 Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Robinson JS ; Twins Timing of Birth Trial Group. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial. BJOG 2012; 119 (8) 964-973
  • 16 Luke B, Brown MB, Alexandre PK , et al. The cost of twin pregnancy: maternal and neonatal factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192 (3) 909-915
  • 17 Soucie JE, Yang Q, Wen SW, Fung Kee Fung K, Walker M. Neonatal mortality and morbidity rates in term twins with advancing gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (1) 172-177
  • 18 Suzuki S, Inde Y, Miyake H. Comparison of short-term outcomes of late pre-term singletons and dichorionic twins and optimal timing of delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 30 (6) 574-577
  • 19 Suzuki S, Otsubo Y, Sawa R, Yoneyama Y, Araki T. Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000; 49 (1) 24-27
  • 20 Spong CY. Defining “term” pregnancy: recommendations from the Defining “Term” Pregnancy Workgroup. JAMA 2013; 309 (23) 2445-2446
  • 21 Breathnach FM, McAuliffe FM, Geary M , et al; Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (1) 50-59
  • 22 Dodd JM, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, Crowther CA. Elective birth at 37 weeks' gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2: CD003582
  • 23 Jackson M. What is new in multiple gestations? Best articles from the past year. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (2 Pt 1) 359-360
  • 24 Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK , et al; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (14) 1295-1305
  • 25 Dias T, Thilaganathan B. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial. BJOG 2012; 119 (13) 1676 , author reply 1676–1677
  • 26 Scholl J, Russell M. Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (6) 1276 , author reply 1276
  • 27 Welsh A, Clements S, Henry A, Bisits A. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial. BJOG 2012; 119 (13) 1675-1676 , author reply 1676–1677
  • 28 Hack KE, Derks JB, de Visser VL, Elias SG, Visser GH. The natural course of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a historical cohort. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9 (3) 450-455
  • 29 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 560: medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (4) 908-910
  • 30 Cleary-Goldman J, D'Alton ME. Uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins and the timing of delivery. PLoS Med 2005; 2 (6) e180
  • 31 Burgess JL, Unal ER, Nietert PJ, Newman RB. Risk of late-preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (6) e1-e9
  • 32 Martin JA, Wilson EC, Osterman MJ, Saadi EW, Sutton SR, Hamilton BE. Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: results from two states. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62 (2) 1-19