Semin Speech Lang 2015; 36(01): 42-49
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396445
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Win-Win: Advancing Written Language Knowledge and Practice through University Clinics

Lauren A. Katz
1   Literacy, Language, and Learning Institute, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH
,
Karen A. Fallon
2   Department of Audiology, Speech-Language Pathology, and Deaf Studies,Towson University, Towson, MD
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 January 2015 (online)

Abstract

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are uniquely suited for assessing and treating individuals with both spoken and written language disorders. Yet as students move from the elementary grades into the middle and high school grades, SLPs tend to provide fewer direct language services to them. Although spoken language disorders become written language disorders, SLP are not receiving sufficient training in the area of written language, and this is reflected in the extent to which they believe they have the knowledge and skills to provide services to struggling readers and writers on their caseloads. In this article, we discuss these problems and present effective methods for addressing them.

 
  • References

  • 1 Fallon KA, Katz LA. Providing written language services in the schools: the time is now. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2011; 42 (1) 3-17
  • 2 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists with Respect to Reading and Writing in Children and Adolescents. Rockville, MD: Author; 2001
  • 3 Joffe VL, Nippold MA. Progress in understanding adolescent language disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2012; 43 (4) 438-444
  • 4 Larson VL, McKinley NL. An introduction. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1993; 24: 19-20
  • 5 Aram DM, Ekelman BL, Nation JE. Preschoolers with language disorders: 10 years later. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27 (2) 232-244
  • 6 Bashir AS, Scavuzzo A. Children with language disorders: natural history and academic success. J Learn Disabil 1992; 25 (1) 53-65 , discussion 66–70
  • 7 Rescorla L. Age 17 language and reading outcomes in late-talking toddlers: support for a dimensional perspective on language delay. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52 (1) 16-30
  • 8 Young AR, Beitchman JH, Johnson C , et al. Young adult academic outcomes in a longitudinal sample of early identified language impaired and control children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2002; 43 (5) 635-645
  • 9 Faggella-Luby M, Sampson Graner P. Literacy supports for adolescent struggling readers: taking action through comprehension instruction. Adv Learn Behav Disabil 2010; 23: 61-94
  • 10 Apel K, Swank LK. Second chances: improving decoding skills in the older student. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1999; 30: 231-242
  • 11 Fallon K, Carlberg R. A Hybrid Approach to Reading Comprehension: Intervention with a University Student [master's thesis]. Towson, MD: Towson University; 2012
  • 12 Dreyer C, Nel C. Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System 2003; 31: 349-365
  • 13 Nicaise M, Gettinger M. Fostering reading comprehension in college students. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly 1995; 16: 283-337
  • 14 Rickard BL, Richards SA, Katz LA, Brackenbury K, Best L, Spencer R. Literacy intervention at the college level: a success story. Poster session presented at: American Speech-Language Hearing Association Convention; November 16–19, 2011 ; San Diego, CA
  • 15 Cortiella C, Horowitz SH. The State of Learning Disabilities: Facts, Trends and Emerging Issues. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities; 2014
  • 16 U.S. Department of Education; National Postsecondary Student Aid Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2002
  • 17 U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research, 2010. National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2), Waves 4 and 5, 2007 and 2009, unpublished tabulations. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_397.asp . Accessed July 15, 2014
  • 18 Hurst D, Smerdon B. Postsecondary Students with Disabilities: Enrollment Services and Persistence. Stats in Brief. ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 444 329. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics; 2000
  • 19 Murray C, Goldstein DE, Nourse S, Edgar E. The postsecondary school attendance and completion rates of high school graduates with learning disabilities. Learn Disabil Res Pract 2000; 15 (3) 119-127
  • 20 Foley NE. Preparing for college: improving the odds for students with learning disabilities. Coll Stud J 2006; 40: 641-645
  • 21 Coleman C, Lindstrom J, Nelson J, Lindstrom W, Gregg KN. Passageless comprehension on the Nelson-Denny reading test: well above chance for university students. J Learn Disabil 2010; 43 (3) 244-249
  • 22 Katz LA, Fallon KA. The final frontier: high school and college students with reading disabilities. In: Ukrainetz TA, ed School-age Language Intervention: Principles and Procedures for Oral and Written Language Success. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; ; in press
  • 23 Katz LA, Guarracino S. Is disclosure of speech-language therapy advantageous for college students?. Poster session presented at: American Speech-Language Hearing Association Convention; November 18–20, 2010 ; Philadelphia, PA
  • 24 Rath KA, Royer JM. The nature and effectiveness of learning disability services for college students. Educ Psychol Rev 2002; 14: 353-381