PDF herunterladen
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 19(03): 216-221
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395997
Original Research
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Relationship between Otolaryngologic Complaints and Systemic Comorbidities Observed in a Group of Hearing Aid Users

Angela Ribas
1   Communication Disorders Postgraduate Program, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
,
Renata Silvestre
1   Communication Disorders Postgraduate Program, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
,
Carla Meller Mottecy
1   Communication Disorders Postgraduate Program, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
,
Lorena Kozlowski
2   Department of Audiology, Centro de Audição e Linguagem, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
,
Jair Mendes Marques
1   Communication Disorders Postgraduate Program, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

12. Mai 2014

18. Oktober 2014

Publikationsdatum:
28. November 2014 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Optimization of the selection, adaptation, and benefit of hearing aids is necessary to characterize and manage hearing loss, user expectations, otolaryngologic symptoms, and systemic comorbidities.

Objective To compare the occurrence of otologic complaints, systemic diseases, and effective use of hearing aids in men and women with deafness.

Methods Patients from a Unified Health System–accredited hearing health service, who reported problems in adapting to their hearing aids, were evaluated by a physician and audiologist. An anamnesis, ENT evaluation, and audiological evaluation were performed.

Results During the data collection period, 278 subjects came in for follow-up visits; of these, 61 (21%) reported otologic or operational problems with their equipment. The most prevalent type of hearing loss was basocochlear, a characteristic of presbycusis, in both men and women; the most frequently reported comorbidities were hypercholesterolemia (more significant in women) and hypertension (more significant in men). Fourteen subjects reported using their device discontinuously, with no significant difference between genders; the reasons for discontinuation of use were itching and ringing, with more complaints from women.

Conclusion The incidence of systemic and audiological complaints is high in this population. These patients should be evaluated thoroughly, as resolutions of these complaints can contribute to improving the quality of life and assist in the process of hearing aid fitting.

Keywords

hearing loss - protocols - hearing aids - ear diseases - chronic disease
 

  • References

  • 1 Zhan W, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BEK , et al. Modifiable determinants of hearing impairment in adults. Prev Med 2011; 53 (4–5) 338-342
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hoffman HJ, Dobie RA, Ko CW, Themann CL, Murphy WJ. Americans hear as well or better today compared with 40 years ago: hearing threshold levels in the unscreened adult population of the United States, 1959–1962 and 1999–2004. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (6) 725-734
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 World Health Organization. Prevention of blindness and deafness. Available at: http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/news/en/ . Accessed November 9, 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Pierre PV, Fridberger A, Wikman A, Alexanderson K. Self-reported hearing difficulties, main income sources, and socio-economic status; a cross-sectional population-based study in Sweden. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 874
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brasil. Ministério da saúde. Portaria no 587 de 7 de outubro de 2004, Anexo IV. 2004. Available at: http://dtr2001.saude.gov.br/sas/PORTARIAS/Port2004/PT-587.htm . Accessed on July 14, 2014.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Shimidt MI, Duncan BB, Silva GA , et al. Chronic noncommunicable diseases in Brazil: burden and current challenges. Lancet 2011; 377 (9781) 1949-1961
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Iwabashi JH, Jardim IS, Sizenando CS, Bento RF. Protocolo de seleção e adaptação de prótese auditiva para indivíduos adultos e idosos. Intl Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 15 (2) 214-222
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Miyaki MAM. Afecções otorrinolaringológicas no idoso: o impacto da polifarmácia. Revista do Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto 2012; 11: 83-91
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Silveira MM, Pasqualotti A, Colussi EL. Prevalência de doenças crônicas e prática de atividades físicas em adultos e idosos. Rev Bras Promç Saúde 2012; 25 (2) 209-214
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Barros MBA, Francisco PMSB, Zanchetta LM, César CLG. Tendências das desigualdades sociais e demográficas na prevalência de doenças crônicas no Brasil, PNAD: 2003–2008. Cien Saude Colet 2011; 16 (9) 3755-3768
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Souza EA, Scochi MJ, Maraschin MS. Estudo da morbidade em uma população idosa. Rev Esc Anna Nery 2011; 15 (2) 380-388
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Tenório JP, Guimarães JATL, Flores NGC, Iório MCM. Comparação entre critérios de classificação dos achados audiométricos em idosos. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2011; 23 (2) 114-118
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mondelli MFCG, Lopes AC. Relação entre a hipertensão arterial e a deficiência auditiva. Intl Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 13 (1) 63-68
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Turi BC, Codogno JS, Fernandes RA, Amaral SL, Monteiro HL. Frequência de ocorrência de doenças crônico-degenerativas em adultos com mais de 50 anos. Rev Bras Atv Fis Saúde 2010; 15 (4) 218-223
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Malucelli DA, Malucelli FJ, Fonseca VR , et al. Hearing loss prevalence in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 78 (3) 105-115
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sousa CS, Castro Junior N, Larsson EJ, Cbing TH. Risk factors for presbycusis in a socioeconomic middleclass sample. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 75 (4) 530-536
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gibrin PCD, Melo JJ, Marchiori LLM. Prevalence of tinnitus complaints and probable association with hearing loss, diabetes mellitus and hypertension in elderly. CoDas 2013; 25 (2) 176-180
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pinto PCL, Sanchez TG, Tomita S. The impact of gender, age and hearing loss on tinnitus severity. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 76 (1) 18-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Viacelli SNA, Costa-Ferreira MID. Perfil dos usuários de AASI com vistas à amplificação, cognição e processamento auditivo. Rev CEFAC 2013; 15 (5) 1125-1136
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lacerda CF, Silva LO, Canto RST, Cheik NC. Efeitos da adaptação às próteses auditivas na qualidade de vida, no equilíbrio e no medo de queda em idosos com perda neurossensorial. Intl Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 16 (2) 156-162
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Paulin F, Zeigelboim BS, Klagenberg KF, Rosa MRD. Achados vestibulares em usuários de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual. Rev CEFAC 2009; 11 (1) 68-75
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Munhoes dos Santos Ferrari G, Sanchez TG, Bovino Pedalini ME. The efficacy of open molds in controlling tinnitus. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 73 (3) 370-377
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Silva RCF, Bandini HHM, Soares IA. Aparelho de amplificação sonora individual: melhora a sensação de zumbido?. Rev CEFAC 2007; 9 (2) 263-268
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Word AP, Nezafati KA, Cruz Jr PD. Ear dermatitis + epoxy reactivity = hearing aid allergy?. Dermatitis 2011; 22 (6) 350-354
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Sasseville D. Acrylates. Dermatitis 2012; 23 (1) 3-5
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Andersson G, Keshishi A, Baguley DM. Benefit from hearing aids in users with and without tinnitus. Audiol Med 2011; 9 (2) 73-78
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ribas AR, Serratto MRF, Bento KA, Vieira M, Lourenço H, Costa TL. Perfil sócio-histórico de pacientes atendidos na clínica de fonoaudiologia da Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná. Rev Biociências. Biotecnologia e Saúde 2012; 4 (1) 13-18
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Rosa MRD, Dante G, Ribas A. Programa de orientação a usuários de prótese auditiva e questionários de autoavaliação: importantes instrumentos para uma adaptação auditiva efetiva. Intl Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 10 (3) 220-227
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Ribeiro LM, Rasera EF. Os idosos e o uso de próteses auditivas: identificando os repertórios interpretativos que justificam essa decisão. Psicol Soc 2008; 20 (3) 425-433
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar