Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2014; 123(12): 614-621
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395621
Wissenschaft – Parodontologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Pulverstrahlverfahren bei Periimplantitis – eine Pilotstudie

Powder stream used in periimplantitis treatment: a pilot study
U. Schnaidt
1   Heidelberg
,
M. Schmitter
1   Heidelberg
,
B. Dannewitz
1   Heidelberg
,
J. Lorenzo Bermejo
1   Heidelberg
,
C. M. Faggion
1   Heidelberg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 January 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Das niedrig abrasive Pulverstrahlverfahren (Glycin 99%, Silizium 1%) zeigte in dieser Pilotstudie eine effektivere Verringerung der Sondierungstiefen nach 6 Monaten als lediglich eine manuelle Reinigung. Um diese Ergebnisse konfirmatorisch zu validieren fordert die durchgeführte Fallzahlplanung unter Berücksichtigung der Einschlusskriterien eine hohe Probandenzahl. Diese kann nur durch weitere Studienzentren erreicht werden.

In the investigated patient cohort, treatment with low abrasive powder stream (glycine 99%, silizium 1%) showed a more effective reduction of probing depths than mechanical debridement with plastic curettes after 6 months. The consideration of our strict inclusion criteria in the sample size calculation results in a large number of study participants which motivate the extension of our clinical trial to other study centers.

Schlüsselwörter

Periimplantitistherapie - Pulverstrahlverfahren - Handinstrumente - Fallzahlplanung

Key words

treatment of periimplantitis - powder stream - hand instruments - sample size estimation - randomized clinical trial
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 119-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pjetursson BE, Bragger U et al. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18 (Suppl. 03) 97-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kotsovilis S, Karoussis IK et al. Therapy of periimplantitis: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 621-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schwarz F, Bieling K, Bonsmann M et al. Nonsurgical treatment of moderate and advanced periimplantitis lesions: a controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Invest 2006; 10: 279-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Faggion Jr CM, Listl S, Frühauf N et al. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on non-surgical treatments for peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41: 1015-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Petersilka GJ, Tunkel J, Barakos K et al. Subgingival plaque removal at interdental sites using a low-abrasive air polishing powder. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 307-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sahm N, Becker J et al. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using an air-abrasive or mechanical debridement and local application of chlorhexidine: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontology 2011; 38: 872-878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mombelli A, Décaillet F. The characteristics of biofilms in peri-implant disease. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 203-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Renvert S, Lessem J, Dahlén G et al. Topical minocycline microspheres versus topical chlorhexidine gel as an adjunct to mechanical debridement of incipient peri-implant infections: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 362-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Zeger SJ, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988; 77: 642-648
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Drago L, Del Fabbro M, Bortolin M et al. Biofilm removal and antimicrobial activity of two different air-polishing powders. An in vitro study. J Periodontol 2014; 7: 1-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Mombelli A. The therapy of peri-implantitis: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 325-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Renvert S, Lindahl C, Roos-Jansaker AM et al. Treatment of periimplantitis using an Er:YAG laser or an air-abrasive device: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 65-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Persson GR, Roos-Jansaker AM et al. Microbiologic results after non-surgical erbium-doped: yttrium, aluminium, and garnet laser or air-abrasive treatment of periimplantitis: A randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011; 32: 1267-1278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schär D, Ramseier CA, Eick S et al. Antiinfective therapy of periimplantitis with adjunctive local drug delivery or photodynamic therapy: Six-month outcomes of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 104-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Toma S, Lasserre JF et al. Evaluation of an air-abrasive device with amino acid glycine-powder during surgical treatment of periimplantitis. Quintessence Int. 2014; 45: 209-219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bassetti M, Bassetti R et al. Subkutanes Emphysem nach nicht chirurgischer Periimplantitistherapie nach der Anwendung einer Air-Flow-Einheit. Swiss Dental Journal 2014; 124: 807-812
    PubMedGoogle Scholar