Download PDF
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 18(S 02): S123-S126
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395269
Review Article
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Advances in Computed Tomography Evaluation of Skull Base Diseases

Luciano M. Prevedello
1   Department of Radiology, Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 October 2014 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Computed tomography (CT) is a key component in the evaluation of skull base diseases. With its ability to clearly delineate the osseous anatomy, CT can provide not only important tips to diagnosis but also key information for surgical planning.

Objectives The purpose of this article is to describe some of the main CT imaging features that contribute to the diagnosis of skull base tumors, review recent knowledge related to bony manifestations of these conditions, and summarize recent technological advances in CT that contribute to image quality and improved diagnosis.

Data Synthesis Recent advances in CT technology allow fine-detailed evaluation of the bony anatomy using submillimetric sections. Dual-energy CT material decomposition capabilities allow clear separation between contrast material, bone, and soft tissues with many clinical applications in the skull base. Dual-energy technology has also the ability to decrease image degradation from metallic hardwares using some techniques that can result in similar or even decreased radiation to patients.

Conclusions CT is very useful in the evaluation of skull base diseases, and recent technological advances can increase disease conspicuity resulting in improved diagnostic capabilities and enhanced surgical planning.

Keywords

skull base - computed tomography - dual energy

Final Comments

CT is an invaluable tool in the evaluation of skull base disease. In addition to providing important tips to diagnosis, it can also depict important landmarks for surgical planning. Recent advances in CT technology allow fine-detailed evaluation of the bony anatomy with submillimetric imaging sections with increased overall image quality and similar or even decreased radiation exposure to patients.


 

  • References

  • 1 Raut AA, Naphade PS, Chawla A. Imaging of skull base: pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2012; 22 (4) 305-316
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hansen TM, Batra S, Lim M , et al. Invasive adenoma and pituitary carcinoma: a SEER database analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2014; 37 (2) 279-285 , discussion 285–286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chen X, Dai J, Ai L , et al. Clival invasion on multi-detector CT in 390 pituitary macroadenomas: correlation with sex, subtype and rates of operative complication and recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32 (4) 785-789
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bikmaz K, Mrak R, Al-Mefty O. Management of bone-invasive, hyperostotic sphenoid wing meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (5) 905-912
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Salehi F, Jalali S, Alkins R , et al. Proteins involved in regulating bone invasion in skull base meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (3) 421-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Freedman H, Forster FM. Bone formation and destruction in hyperostoses associated with meningiomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1948; 7 (1) 69-80
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bonnal J, Thibaut A, Brotchi J, Born J. Invading meningiomas of the sphenoid ridge. J Neurosurg 1980; 53 (5) 587-599
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Heick A, Mosdal C, Jørgensen K, Klinken L. Localized cranial hyperostosis of meningiomas: a result of neoplastic enzymatic activity?. Acta Neurol Scand 1993; 87 (3) 243-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pompili A, Derome PJ, Visot A, Guiot G. Hyperostosing meningiomas of the sphenoid ridge—clinical features, surgical therapy, and long-term observations: review of 49 cases. Surg Neurol 1982; 17 (6) 411-416
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Maroon JC, Kennerdell JS, Vidovich DV, Abla A, Sternau L. Recurrent spheno-orbital meningioma. J Neurosurg 1994; 80 (2) 202-208
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Goyal N, Kakkar A, Sarkar C, Agrawal D. Does bony hyperostosis in intracranial meningioma signify tumor invasion? A radio-pathologic study. Neurol India 2012; 60 (1) 50-54
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pieper DR, Al-Mefty O, Hanada Y, Buechner D. Hyperostosis associated with meningioma of the cranial base: secondary changes or tumor invasion. Neurosurgery 1999; 44 (4) 742-746 , discussion 746–747
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chiechi MV, Smirniotopoulos JG, Mena H. Intracranial hemangiopericytomas: MR and CT features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17 (7) 1365-1371
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Parizel PM, Carpentier K, Van Marck V , et al. Pneumosinus dilatans in anterior skull base meningiomas. Neuroradiology 2013; 55 (3) 307-311
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Eldevik OP, Blaivas M, Gabrielsen TO, Hald JK, Chandler WF. Craniopharyngioma: radiologic and histologic findings and recurrence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17 (8) 1427-1439
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Cho YH, Kim JH, Khang SK, Lee J-K, Kim CJ. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: comparative analysis of clinical results in 30 patients. Neurosurg Rev 2008; 31 (1) 35-43 , discussion 43
    Google Scholar
  • 17 La Fata V, McLean N, Wise SK, DelGaudio JM, Hudgins PA. CSF leaks: correlation of high-resolution CT and multiplanar reformations with intraoperative endoscopic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29 (3) 536-541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Stone JA, Castillo M, Neelon B, Mukherji SK. Evaluation of CSF leaks: high-resolution CT compared with contrast-enhanced CT and radionuclide cisternography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20 (4) 706-712
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Seo H, Choi DS, Shin HS, Cho JM, Koh EH, Son S. Bone subtraction 3D CT venography for the evaluation of cerebral veins and venous sinuses: imaging techniques, normal variations, and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202 (2) W169–W175
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Pomerantz SR, Kamalian S, Zhang D , et al. Virtual monochromatic reconstruction of dual-energy unenhanced head CT at 65–75 keV maximizes image quality compared with conventional polychromatic CT. Radiology 2013; 266 (1) 318-325
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Guggenberger R, Winklhofer S, Osterhoff G , et al. Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels. Eur Radiol 2012; 22 (11) 2357-2364
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lewis M, Reid K, Toms AP. Reducing the effects of metal artefact using high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT (DECT) in hip replacements. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42 (2) 275-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Henzler T, Fink C, Schoenberg SO, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT: radiation dose aspects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (5, Suppl): S16-S25
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tawfik AM, Kerl JM, Razek AA , et al. Image quality and radiation dose of dual-energy CT of the head and neck compared with a standard 120-kVp acquisition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32 (11) 1994-1999
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Vogl TJ, Schulz B, Bauer RW, Stöver T, Sader R, Tawfik AM. Dual-energy CT applications in head and neck imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (5, Suppl): S34-S39
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wichmann JL, Nöske E-M, Kraft J , et al. Virtual monoenergetic dual-energy computed tomography: optimization of kiloelectron volt settings in head and neck cancer. Invest Radiol 2014; ; [Epub ahead of print]
    Google Scholar