Download PDF
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2015; 47(02): 134-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1394424
Übersichtsarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Das sekundäre Angiosarkom der Brust nach brusterhaltender Therapie

Secondary Angiosarcoma of the Breast after Breast-conserving Therapy
P. Wiebringhaus
1   Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Handchirurige, Zentrum für Schwerbrandverletzte, Sana Klinikum Offenbach,Offenbach
,
A. Gröger
1   Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Handchirurige, Zentrum für Schwerbrandverletzte, Sana Klinikum Offenbach,Offenbach
,
H. Menke
1   Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Handchirurige, Zentrum für Schwerbrandverletzte, Sana Klinikum Offenbach,Offenbach
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 15 July 2014

akzeptiert 12 October 2014

Publication Date:
20 November 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Durch das Mammografie-Screening werden zunehmend kleine Mamma-Carcinome entdeckt, welche mit einer brusterhaltenden Therapie (BET) und anschließender Bestrahlung kurativ behandelt werden können. Aufgrund der Zunahme der Brust Bestrahlungen nach brusterhaltender Therapie häufen sich die Fälle von strahleninduzierten sekundären Neoplasien. Die am häufigsten auftretende sekundäre Neoplasie ist das Angiosarkom. Dies entsteht mit einer Latenz von 4–7 Jahren nach einer Bestrahlungstherapie. Genetische Prädisposition und eine strahleninduzierte Entartung von Endothelzellen werden als auslösender Faktoren beschrieben.

Ziel der Arbeit: In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird auf Grundlage der vorliegenden Literatur und der Erfahrung der Autoren die chirurgische Behandlungsmöglichkeit dargestellt und Anhand einiger Fallbeispiele zur Diskussion gestellt.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion: Eine radikale Exzision des Tumors mit einem ausreichenden Sicherheitsabstand ist die Therapie der Wahl. Durch das lokal destruierende Wachstum des Angiosarkoms stellt dies eine besondere Herausforderung an den Chirurgen dar. Die Defektdeckung des entstandenen Gewebedefizits ist aufgrund des vorbestrahlen Gewebes ebenfalls anspruchsvoll und limitiert die rekonstruktiven Möglichkeiten. Hier sollten individuelle Faktoren, wie Alter der Patientin, lokaler Gefäßstatus und Wunsch nach einer Brust-Rekonstruktion berücksichtigt werden. Trotz kurativer Resektion liegt die 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate bei sekundären Angiosarkomen zwischen 20–30%.

Abstract

Background: Mammography for the detection of early stage breast cancer is widely established. Breast-conserving therapy followed by radiation therapy is the most common therapy for early stage breast cancer. Due to the increasing use of radiation therapy in breast cancer, secondary neoplasia are induced. The most common secondary neoplasia of the breast is the angiosarcoma. It occurs 4–7 years after radiation therapy. Genetic predisposition and a transformation of endothelial cells by radiation therapy are known to lead to angiosarcoma.

Objective: The present paper outlines a concept for treatment on the basis of the current literature and the experience of the authors.

Results and Conclusion: Radical surgical resection of the tumour with a sufficient margin of safety is the treatment of choice for angiosarcoma. Tumour infiltration of the chest wall and other local structures are challenges for the surgeon performing a radical tumour resection. The replacement of the tissue is also demanding for the surgeon. After radiation therapy the reconstructive options are limited. Individual factors such as age, quality of local vessels and the patients demand for breast reconstruction should be considered. Although R0 resection is performed, the 5-year survival rates are 20–30%.

Schlüsselwörter

Mammarekonstruktion - Brustchirurgie - Brust - gestielte Lappenplastiken - Angiosarkom

Key words

breast reconstruction - breast cancer - breast - pedicled flaps - angiosarcoma
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Albert US, Altland H, Duda V et al. Summary of the updated stage 3 guideline for early detection of breast cancer in Germany 2008. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2008; 180: 455-465
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Williams NR, Pigott KH, Brew-Graves C et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Gland surgery 2014; 3: 109-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Classen J, Nitzsche S, Wallwiener D et al. Fibrotic changes after postmastectomy radiotherapy and reconstructive surgery in breast cancer. A retrospective analysis in 109 patients. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie: Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft [et al.] 2010; 186: 630-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Seinen JM, Styring E, Verstappen V et al. Radiation-associated angiosarcoma after breast cancer: high recurrence rate and poor survival despite surgical treatment with R0 resection. Annals of surgical oncology 2012; 19: 2700-2706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Monroe AT, Feigenberg SJ, Mendenhall NP. Angiosarcoma after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 2003; 97: 1832-1840
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Marchal C, Weber B, de Lafontan B et al. Nine breast angiosarcomas after conservative treatment for breast carcinoma: a survey from French comprehensive Cancer Centers. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 1999; 44: 113-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stewart FW, Treves N. Lymphangiosarcoma in postmastectomy lymphedema; a report of six cases in elephantiasis chirurgica. Cancer 1948; 1: 64-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Patton KT, Deyrup AT, Weiss SW. Atypical vascular lesions after surgery and radiation of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 32 cases analyzing histologic heterogeneity and association with angiosarcoma. The American journal of surgical pathology 2008; 32: 943-950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hadj-Hamou NS, Lae M, Almeida A et al. A transcriptome signature of endothelial lymphatic cells coexists with the chronic oxidative stress signature in radiation-induced post-radiotherapy breast angiosarcomas. Carcinogenesis 2012; 33: 1399-1405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005; 366: 2087-2106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Offersen BV, Overgaard M, Kroman N et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation as part of breast conserving therapy of early breast carcinoma: a systematic review. Radiotherapy and oncology: journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 2009; 90: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hui A, Henderson M, Speakman D et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast: a difficult surgical challenge. Breast 2012; 21: 584-589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nestle-Kramling C, Bolke E, Budach W et al. Hemangiosarcoma after breast-conserving therapy of breast cancer: report of four cases with molecular genetic diagnosis and literature review. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie: Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft [et al.] 2011; 187: 656-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 D’Angelo SP, Antonescu CR, Kuk D et al. High-risk features in radiation-associated breast angiosarcomas. British journal of cancer 2013; 109: 2340-2346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fraga-Guedes C, Gobbi H, Mastropasqua MG et al. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 30 cases of post-radiation atypical vascular lesion of the breast. Breast cancer research and treatment 2014; 146: 347-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kadouri L, Sagi M, Goldberg Y et al. Genetic predisposition to radiation induced sarcoma: possible role for BRCA and p53 mutations. Breast cancer research and treatment 2013; 140: 207-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Biswas T, Tang P, Muhs A et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast: a rare clinicopathological entity. American journal of clinical oncology 2009; 32: 582-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Kaufman RJ et al. Angiosarcoma of the breast. Radiology 1992; 183: 649-654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Glazebrook KN, Magut MJ, Reynolds C. Angiosarcoma of the breast. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2008; 190: 533-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 West J, Liao SY, Cho D. Angiosarcoma after breast conservation: diagnostic pitfalls. Clinical breast cancer 2008; 8: 94-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hanna G, Lin SJ, Wertheimer MD et al. Unresolved, atraumatic breast hematoma: post-irradiation or secondary breast angiosarcoma. Breast disease 2011; 33: 139-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yang WT, Hennessy BT, Dryden MJ et al. Mammary angiosarcomas: imaging findings in 24 patients. Radiology 2007; 242: 725-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jallali N, James S, Searle A et al. Surgical management of radiation-induced angiosarcoma after breast conservation therapy. American journal of surgery 2012; 203: 156-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Catena F, Santini D, Di Saverio S et al. Skin angiosarcoma arising in an irradiated breast: case-report and literature review. Dermatologic surgery: official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] 2006; 32: 447-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lindford A, Bohling T, Vaalavirta L et al. Surgical management of radiation-associated cutaneous breast angiosarcoma. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS 2011; 64: 1036-1042
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dragu A, Hohenberger W, Lang W et al. Forequarter amputation of the right upper chest: limitations of ultra radical interdisciplinary oncological surgery. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 2011; 82: 834-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Man LX, Selber JC, Serletti JM. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2009; 124: 752-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gart MS, Smetona JT, Hanwright PJ et al. Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2013; 216: 229-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sternberg EG, Perdikis G, McLaughlin SA et al. Latissimus dorsi flap remains an excellent choice for breast reconstruction. Annals of plastic surgery 2006; 56: 31-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Moore TS, Farrell LD. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: long-term results. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1992; 89: 666-672 discussion 673-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Serletti JM. Breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap: pedicled and free. Journal of surgical oncology 2006; 94: 532-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Warbrick-Smith J, O’Neill JK, Wilson P. Giant anterior chest wall basal cell carcinoma: a reconstructive challenge and review of the literature. BMJ case reports 2013; 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Linthorst M, van Geel AN, Baartman EA et al. Effect of a combined surgery, re-irradiation and hyperthermia therapy on local control rate in radio-induced angiosarcoma of the chest wall. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie: Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft [et al.] 2013; 189: 387-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Smith TL, Morris CG, Mendenhall NP. Angiosarcoma after breast-conserving therapy: long-term disease control and late effects with hyperfractionated accelerated re-irradiation (HART). Acta oncologica 2014; 53: 235-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Torres KE, Ravi V, Kin K et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with radiation-associated angiosarcomas of the breast following surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer. Annals of surgical oncology 2013; 20: 1267-1274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hoffmann G, Mylonas I. Therapy of radiation-induced angiosarcoma of the breast in an elderly patient. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2013; 287: 827-831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar