Background and study aims: One of the challenges in performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the
lack of counter traction during submucosal dissection. MASTER (Master and Slave Transluminal
Endoscopic Robot) was designed to allow performance of complex endoluminal procedures
using two arms with excellent control. This study aimed to compare the performance
of ESD between endoscopists and novices using MASTER.
Methods: This is a prospective study comparing the differences in performing ESD using MASTER
in an ex vivo porcine stomach model among individuals with or without experience in
surgery and endoscopy. Multiple standardized lesions of 20 mm2 were pre-marked on an ex vivo porcine stomach. Each participant received basic training
in controlling MASTER before the ESD procedure. The operative time and size of specimen
obtained by each participant were noted.
Results: Nine individuals (three ESD expert endoscopists, three ESD non-expert endoscopists,
and three non-clinician novices) participated in the experiment. All participants
completed the ESD procedure for en bloc resection of standardized lesions using EndoMASTER
without perforation. The mean times (mean ± SD) taken by ESD expert endoscopists,
ESD non-expert endoscopists, and novices to complete Robotic ESD were 122 ± 58 s,
203 ± 150 s, and 561 ± 496 s, respectively. There was no statistically significant
difference in the mean operative time to complete the ESD between the three groups
(P = 0.242). When the performance of the six endoscopists was compared to that of the
three novices, the endoscopists took an average of 162 ± 111 s to complete the ESD,
while the non-clinicians required an average of 561 ± 496 s (P = 0.085).
Conclusions: There was a trend to shorter operative time when comparing endoscopists to non-endoscopists
in performing ESD using MASTER. The use of MASTER enabled the novice without endoscopy
experience to complete the ESD procedure.
