Endosc Int Open 2015; 03(06): E659-E661
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393075
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Gastrografin as an alternative booster to sodium phosphate in colon capsule endoscopy: safety and efficacy pilot study[*]

Kazutomo Togashi
1   Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu-city, Japan
,
Tomoki Fujita
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Otaru Ekiseikai General Hospital, Otaru, Japan
,
Kenichi Utano
1   Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu-city, Japan
,
Eriko Waga
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Otaru Ekiseikai General Hospital, Otaru, Japan
,
Shinichi Katsuki
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Otaru Ekiseikai General Hospital, Otaru, Japan
,
Noriyuki Isohata
1   Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu-city, Japan
,
Shungo Endo
1   Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu-city, Japan
,
Alan K. Lefor
3   Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 13. März 2015

accepted after revision 11. August 2015

Publikationsdatum:
23. September 2015 (online)

Background and study aims: Sodium phosphate is a key component of bowel preparation regimen for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), but may cause serious complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of Gastrografin, substituted for sodium phosphate, in CCE bowel preparation.

Patients and methods: In total, 29 patients (median age 64 years; 23 females) underwent CCE, covered by the national health insurance system of Japan. All had a history of laparotomy and/or previously incomplete colonoscopy. On the day before examination, patients ingested 1 L of polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid with 0.5 L of water in the evening, and again the same laxative on the morning of examination. After capsule ingestion, 50 mL of Gastrografin diluted with 0.9 L of magnesium citrate was administered, and then repeated after 1 hour.

Results: The capsule excretion rate was 97 % (28/29). The median colon transit time was 2 hours 45 minutes and rapid transit (< 40 minutes) through the colon occurred in one patient (3.4 %). Bowel cleansing level was adequate in 90 % of patients. The polyp (≥ 6 mm) detection rate was 52 %. Diluted Gastrografin was well tolerated by patients. No adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: Gastrografin can be an alternative to sodium phosphate in CCE bowel preparation regimen.

* This pilot study was conducted at two medical centers (Aizu and Otaru) in Japan.


 
  • References

  • 1 Sieg A, Friedrich K, Sieg U. Is PillCam COLON capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community gastroenterology practice. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 848-854
  • 2 Spada C, Riccioni ME, Hassan C et al. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial comparing two regimens of preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 119-124
  • 3 Singhal S, Nigar S, Paleti V et al. Bowel preparation regimens for colon capsule endoscopy: a review. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2014; 7: 115-122
  • 4 Markowitz GS, Nasr SH, Klein P et al. Renal failure due to acute nephrocalcinosis following oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing. Hum Pathol 2004; 35: 675-684
  • 5 Ehrenpreis ED, Parakkal D, Semer R et al. Renal risks of sodium phosphate tablets for colonoscopy preparation: a review of adverse drug reactions reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: e270-e275
  • 6 Spada C, Hassan C, Barbaro B et al. Colon capsule versus CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy: a prospective, comparative trial. Gut 2015; 64: 272-281
  • 7 Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. NEJM 2008; 359: 1207-1217
  • 8 Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM et al. Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 963-970
  • 9 Schoofs N, Deviere J, Van Gossum A. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 971-977
  • 10 Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. NEJM 2009; 361: 264-270
  • 11 Rondonotti E, Borghi C, Mandelli G et al. Accuracy of capsule colonoscopy and computed tomographic colonography in individuals with positive results from the fecal occult blood test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 1303-1310
  • 12 Rex DK, Adler SN, Aisenberg J et al. Accuracy of capsule colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2015; 148: 948-957