Value of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and dual focus narrow-band imaging (dNBI) in diagnosing early squamous cell neoplasms in esophageal Lugol’s voiding lesions

Background and study aims: Lugol’s chromoendoscopy provides excellent sensitivity for the detection of early esophageal squamous cell neoplasms (ESCN), but its specificity is suboptimal. An endoscopy technique for real-time histology is required to decrease the number of unnecessary biopsies. This study aimed to compare the ESCN diagnostic capability of probed-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and dual focus narrow-band imaging (dNBI) in Lugol’s voiding lesions.

Patients and methods: Patients with a history of head and neck cancer without dysphagia were recruited. Lugol’s voiding lesions larger than 5 mm were sequentially characterized by dNBI and pCLE by two independent operators. Finally, all lesions larger than 5 mm were biopsied followed by histological analysis, which is considered to be the gold standard in cancer diagnosis. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the accuracy of the two techniques.

Results: In total, 44 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 60 years; 80 % were male. Twenty-one Lugol’s voiding lesions larger than 5 mm were detected in 12 patients. Seven lesions (33 %) from four patients were histologically diagnosed as ESCNs (four with high grade dysplasia and three with low grade dysplasia). The other 14 lesions were histologically confirmed as non-neoplastic: active esophagitis, glycogenation with inflammation, acute ulcer, inlet patch, and unremarkable changes. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of pCLE vs. dNBI were 83 % vs. 85 %, 92 % vs. 62 %, 83 % vs. 54 %, 92 % vs. 89 %, and 89 % vs. 70 %, respectively (NS).

Conclusions: Asymptomatic patients with a history of head and neck cancer underwent Lugol’s chromoendoscopy based ESCN surveillance. Further characterization of the Lugol’s voiding lesions by advanced imaging showed that both pCLE and dNBI provided good sensitivity in diagnosing ESCN, and pCLE tended to provide higher specificity, PPV, and accuracy than dNBI. Perhaps the trend of lower specificity of dNBI in this study was possibly because of the interference from Lugol’s stain on the interpretation of intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCLs). Further study is required to seek a significant difference in the performance of dNBI and pCLE in a larger group of patients.

• References

• 1 Priante AV, Castilho EC, Kowalski LP. Second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2011; 13: 132-137
• 2 Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. NEJM 2003; 349: 2241-2252
• 3 Lee JM, Turini M, Botteman MF et al. Economic burden of head and neck cancer. A literature review. Eur J Health Econ 2004; 5: 70-80
• 4 Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman SM et al. Head and neck cancer. NEJM 1993; 328: 184-194
• 5 Slaughter DP, Southwick HW, Smejkal W. Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium; clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer 1953; 6: 963-968
• 6 Chen MC, Chen PT, Chan CH et al. Second primary esophageal or lung cancer in patients with head and neck carcinoma in Taiwan: incidence and risk in relation to primary index tumor site. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2011; 137: 115-123
• 7 Morris LG, Sikora AG, Hayes RB et al. Anatomic sites at elevated risk of second primary cancer after an index head and neck cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2011; 22: 671-679
• 8 Wang WL, Lee CT, Lee YC et al. Risk factors for developing synchronous esophageal neoplasia in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2011; 33: 77-81
• 9 Tubiana M. Can we reduce the incidence of second primary malignancies occurring after radiotherapy?. A critical review. Radiother Oncol 2009; 91: 4-15 ; discussion 11 – 13
• 10 Schwartz LH, Ozsahin M, Zhang GN et al. Synchronous and metachronous head and neck carcinomas. Cancer 1994; 74: 1933-1938
• 11 Atabek U, Mohit-Tabatabai MA, Rush BF et al. Impact of esophageal screening in patients with head and neck cancer. Am Surg 1990; 56: 289-292
• 12 Rennemo E, Zatterstrom U, Boysen M. Impact of second primary tumors on survival in head and neck cancer: an analysis of 2,063 cases. Laryngoscope 2008; 118: 1350-1356
• 13 Morimoto M, Nishiyama K, Nakamura S et al. Significance of endoscopic screening and endoscopic resection for esophageal cancer in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010; 40: 938-943
• 14 Katada C, Muto M, Momma K et al. Clinical outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae – a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 779-783
• 15 Wang GQ, Abnet CC, Shen Q et al. Histological precursors of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a 13 year prospective follow up study in a high risk population. Gut 2005; 54: 187-192
• 16 Dubuc J, Legoux JL, Winnock M et al. Endoscopic screening for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in high-risk patients: a prospective study conducted in 62 French endoscopy centers. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 690-695
• 17 Liu H, Li YQ, Yu T et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 99-106
• 18 Hashimoto CL, Iriya K, Baba ER et al. Lugol's dye spray chromoendoscopy establishes early diagnosis of esophageal cancer in patients with primary head and neck cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 275-282
• 19 Freitag CP, Barros SG, Kruel CD et al. Esophageal dysplasias are detected by endoscopy with Lugol in patients at risk for squamous cell carcinoma in southern Brazil. Dis Esophagus 1999; 12: 191-195
• 20 Lee CT, Chang CY, Lee YC et al. Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy for the screening of esophageal cancer in patients with primary head and neck cancers. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 613-619
• 21 Takenaka R, Kawahara Y, Okada H et al. Narrow-band imaging provides reliable screening for esophageal malignancy in patients with head and neck cancers. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2942-2948
• 22 Ide E, Maluf-Filho F, Chaves DM et al. Narrow-band imaging without magnification for detecting early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4408-4413
• 23 Evans JA, Nishioka NS. Endoscopic confocal microscopy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2005; 21: 578-584
• 24 Polglase AL, McLaren WJ, Skinner SA et al. A fluorescence confocal endomicroscope for in vivo microscopy of the upper- and the lower-GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 686-695
• 25 Pech O, Rabenstein T, Manner H et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for in vivo diagnosis of early squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 89-94
• 26 Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 1
• 27 Uedo N, Fujishiro M, Goda K et al. Role of narrow band imaging for diagnosis of early-stage esophagogastric cancer: current consensus of experienced endoscopists in Asia-Pacific region. Dig Endosc 2011; 23: 58-71
• 28 Lee YC, Wang CP, Chen CC et al. Transnasal endoscopy with narrow-band imaging and Lugol staining to screen patients with head and neck cancer whose condition limits oral intubation with standard endoscope (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 408-417
• 29 Yazbeck VY, Villaruz L, Haley M et al. Management of normal tissue toxicity associated with chemoradiation (primary skin, esophagus, and lung). Cancer J 2013; 19: 231-237
• 30 Shimizu Y, Omori T, Yokoyama A et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of early squamous neoplasia of the esophagus with iodine staining: high-grade intra-epithelial neoplasia turns pink within a few minutes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 546-550
• 31 Nagami Y, Tominaga K, Machida H et al. Usefulness of non-magnifying narrow-band imaging in screening of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective comparative study using propensity score matching. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 845-854