Open Access
Endosc Int Open 2015; 03(01): E91-E98
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390747
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula according to type of cholecystectomy

Ahmad M. Sultan
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Ayman M. Elnakeeb
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Mohamed M. Elshobary
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Ahmed A. El-Geidi
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Tarek Salah
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Ehab A. El-hanafy
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Ehab Atif
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Emad Hamdy
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Gamal K. Elebiedy
Gastro-enterology Surgical Center, Surgery Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 24. April 2014

accepted after revision 08. September 2014

Publikationsdatum:
24. Oktober 2014 (online)

Preview

Background and study aims: A study was undertaken to describe the management of post-cholecystectomy biliary fistula according to the type of cholecystectomy.

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of 111 patients was undertaken. They were divided into open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) groups.

Results: Of the 111 patients, 38 (34.2 %) underwent LC and 73 (65.8 %) underwent OC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) diagnosed major bile duct injury (BDI) in 27 patients (38.6 %) in the OC group and in 3 patients (7.9 %) in the LC group (P = 0.001). Endoscopic management was not feasible in 15 patients (13.5 %) because of failed cannulation (n = 3) or complete ligation of the common bile duct (n = 12). Endoscopic therapy stopped leakage in 35 patients (92.1 %) and 58 patients (82.9 %) following LC and OC, respectively, after the exclusion of 3 patients in whom cannulation failed (P = 0 0.150). Major BDI was more commonly detected after OC (P < 0.001). Leakage was controlled endoscopically in 77 patients (98.7 %) with minor BDI and in 16 patients (53.3 %) with major BDI (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Major BDI is more common in patients presenting with bile leakage after OC. ERCP is the first-choice treatment for minor BDI. Surgery plays an important role in major BDI. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatogrphy (MRCP) should be used before ERCP in patients with bile leakage following OC or converted LC.