Download PDF
Klin Padiatr 2014; 226(06/07): 323-331
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385918
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Re-induction with L-DNR/FLAG Improves Response after AML Relapse, but not Long-term Survival

Re-induktion mit L-DNR/FLAG verbessert die Ansprechraten bei AML Rezidiven, jedoch nicht die Überlebensraten
U. Creutzig
1   Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
J. Semmler
1   Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
G. L. Kaspers
2   Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
,
D. Reinhardt
1   Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
,
M. Zimmermann
1   Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 November 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: According to the results of the international study Relapsed AML 2001/01 response was better after re-induction with L-DNR/FLAG (liposomal daunorubicin, fludarabine, cytarabine, G-CSF) compared to FLAG only but survival rate was not improved. However, the findings might be group-specific.

Method: Patient characteristics, actual therapy given and long-term course of the disease in 155 pediatric patients (including non-randomized) with first relapse and 10 primary nonresponders treated in Germany were analyzed.

Results: Overall 4-year survival rates after relapse were similar in the 2 treatment groups L-DNR/FLAG and FLAG (0.43±0.05 vs. 0.47±0.06, p(log-rank)=0.47). The rate of randomization was low (65%) and 5% of the 101 randomized patients changed the treatment arm. Therefore, induction was based in 40% patients on an individual decision with preference for L-DNR/FLAG. There were less patients with favorable cytogenetics and morphology in the L-DNR/FLAG-group (p<0.04). Response to the first re-induction course at day 28 tended to be more unfavorable with FLAG only. In this patient group protocol intensifications were more frequent as compared to the L-DNR/FLAG-group (p=0.07), and late CR could be achieved after intensification in 9/18 poor responding patients.

Conclusion: The initial selection bias of relapse patients with unfavorable risk factors to the disadvantage of the L-DNR/FLAG-group and the more drug- and time-intensive treatment after 1st re-induction given in the FLAG-group may have nullified the initial beneficial effect of L-DNR containing re-induction therapy and led to similar and relatively favorable survival rates in both treatment groups in Germany.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Nach den Ergebnissen der internationalen Studie Relapsed AML 2001/01 war das Ansprechen nach Re-Induktion mit L-DNR/FLAG (liposomales Daunorubicin, Fludarabin, Cytarabin, G-CSF) im Vergleich zu FLAG bei den randomisierte Patienten besser, das Überleben war jedoch gleich.

Methode: Daraufhin wurden bei 155 pädiatrischen in Deutschland behandelten Patienten mit ersten Rezidiv und 10 primären Nonrespondern (Nicht-randomisierte eingeschlossen) die Patientencharakteristika, die aktuelle Therapie und die langfristigen Verläufe analysiert.

Ergebnisse: Die 4-Jahres Überlebensraten der 155 Rezidivpatienten waren in den Behandlungsgruppen L-DNR/FLAG und FLAG vergleichbar (0,43±0,05 vs. 0,47±0,06, p(log-rank)=0,47). Die Randomisationsrate war niedrig (101/155=65%), die Art der Induktion basierte bei 40% der Rezi­divpatienten auf einer individuellen Entscheidung, überwiegend zu Gunsten von L-DNR/FLAG. Die L-DNR/FLAG Gruppe enthielt signifikant weniger Patienten mit günstiger Zytogenetik/Morphologie. Das Ansprechen auf die erste Induktion war bei alleiniger FLAG Gabe am Tag 28 tendenziell ungünstiger. In dieser Gruppe waren Protokollintensivierungen häufiger als in der L-DNR/FLAG Gruppe (p=0,07), (9/18 FLAG-Patienten mit schlechtem Ansprechen erreichten noch eine späte CR).

Schlussfolgerung: Insgesamt dürfte der initiale Selektionsbias mit ungünstigen Risikofaktoren zum Nachteil der L-DNR/FLAG Gruppe und die spätere chemotherapeutisch- und zeitintensi­vierte Behandlung in der FLAG Gruppe den anfänglichen Vorteil der L-DNR/FLAG Induktion relativieren und damit die ähnlichen und relativ guten Überlebensraten in beiden Behandlungsgruppen erklären.

Key words

AML relapse - children - re-induction therapy - liposomal daunorubicin - FLAG

Schlüsselwörter

AML Rezidive - Kinder - Re-Induktionstherapie - liposomales Daunorubicin - FLAG
 

  • References

  • 1 Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103: 620-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT et al. Proposal for the recognition of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML-MO). Br J Haematol 1991; 78: 325-329
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Creutzig U, Diekamp S, Zimmermann M et al. Longitudinal evaluation of early and late anthracycline cardiotoxicity in children with AML. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007; 48: 651-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Creutzig U, Ritter J, Zimmermann M et al. Idarubicin improves blast cell clearance during induction therapy in children with AML: results of study AML-BFM 93. AML-BFM Study Group. Leukemia 2001; 15: 348-354
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Creutzig U, Zimmerman M, Dworzak M et al. The prognostic significance of early treatment response in pediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: Results of the international study Relapsed AML 2001/01. Haematologica 2014; Epub ahead of print
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Bourquin JP et al. Randomized trial comparing liposomal daunorubicin with idarubicin as induction for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: results from Study AML-BFM 2004. Blood 2013; 122: 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Dworzak MN et al. Development of a curative treatment within the AML-BFM studies. Klin Padiatr 2013; 225 (Suppl. 01) S79-S86
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Lehrnbecher T et al. Less toxicity by optimizing chemotherapy, but not by addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia: results of AML-BFM 98. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4499-4506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Reinhardt D et al. Early deaths and treatment-related mortality in children undergoing therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of the multicenter clinical trials AML-BFM 93 and AML-BFM 98. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4384-4393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Ritter J et al. Definition of a standard-risk group in children with AML. Br J Haematol 1999; 104: 630-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Drobyski WR, Klein J, Flomenberg N et al. Superior survival associated with transplantation of matched unrelated versus one-antigen-mismatched unrelated or highly human leukocyte antigen-disparate haploidentical family donor marrow grafts for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: establishing a treatment algorithm for recipients of alternative donor grafts. Blood 2002; 99: 806-814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Goemans BF, Tamminga RY, Corbijn CM et al. Outcome for children with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia in the Netherlands following initial treatment between 1980 and 1998: survival after chemotherapy only?. Haematologica 2008; 93: 1418-1420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kalbfleisch J, Prentice R. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, NY: 2002
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kaspers GJ, Zimmermann M, Reinhardt D et al. Improved outcome in pediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized trial on liposomal daunorubicin by the International BFM Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 599-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kremer LC, van Dalen EC, Offringa M et al. Anthracycline-induced clinical heart failure in a cohort of 607 children: long-term follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 191-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Reinhardt D, von Neuhoff C, Sander A et al. Genetic prognostic factors in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Klin Padiatr 2012; 224: 372-376
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Reinhardt D, Hempel G, Fleischhack G et al. Liposomal daunorubicine combined with cytarabine in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia in children. Klin Padiatr 2002; 214: 188-194
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Dahl G et al. Minimal residual disease-directed therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukaemia: results of the AML02 multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 543-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rubnitz JE, Razzouk BI, Lensing S et al. Prognostic factors and outcome of recurrence in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 2007; 109: 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sander A, Zimmermann M, Dworzak M et al. Consequent and intensified relapse therapy improved survival in pediatric AML: results of relapse treatment in 379 patients of three consecutive AML-BFM trials. Leukemia 2010; 24: 1422-1428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Szer J. The prevalent predicament of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012; 2012: 43-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Veys P, Amrolia P, Rao K. The role of haploidentical stem cell transplantation in the management of children with haematological disorders. Br J Haematol 2003; 123: 193-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Zwaan CM, Reinhardt D, Zimmerman M et al. Salvage treatment for children with refractory first or second relapse of acute myeloid leukaemia with gemtuzumab ozogamicin: results of a phase II study. Br J Haematol 2010; 148: 768-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar