Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 18(04): 398-402
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385846
Original Research
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Membrane Stress Proclivities in the Mammalian Labyrinth

Daniel J. Pender
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

28 May 2014

21 June 2014

Publication Date:
25 August 2014 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The membranes of the inferior division of the labyrinth in some mammals appear more vulnerable to hydropic distention than those of the superior division. This finding in guinea pigs, cats, and humans has been attributed to the evidently thinner membranes with implied higher stress levels.

Objective The objective of this study is to identify other configurational features, if any, that may contribute to membrane stress proclivity and therefore might act to augment or ameliorate stress in the several chambers of the membranous labyrinth.

Methods Stress proclivity can be investigated using shell theory to analyze a geometric model of the labyrinthine membranes in mammals. Such an approach can provide the necessary mathematical descriptions of stress in each chamber of the labyrinth.

Results Stress proclivity depends on three physical features: membrane thickness, radial size, and chamber shape. Lower stress proclivities are projected for smaller chambers with thick, highly synclastic membranes. Higher stress levels are projected for larger chambers with thin, flat, or anticlastic membranes.

Conclusions In the mammalian labyrinth, pars superior chambers exhibit permutations of membrane thickness, size, and favorable shapes that reduce stress proclivity. In contrast, the pars inferior chambers are characterized by thin membranes with flat contours and adverse shapes that make them especially vulnerable to hydropic distention.

 
  • References

  • 1 Pender DJ. A geometric appraisal of the labyrinthine membranes in mammals. Otorinolaringologia. 2013; 63: 85-97
  • 2 Schuknecht HF, Gulya AJ. Endolymphatic hydrops. An overview and classification. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1983; 106: 1-20
  • 3 Kimura RS. Experimental blockage of the endolymphatic duct and sac and its effect on the inner ear of the guinea pig. A study on endolymphatic hydrops. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967; 76 (3) 664-687
  • 4 Hallpike CS, Cairns H. Observations on the pathology of Ménière's syndrome: (Section of Otology). Proc R Soc Med 1938; 31 (11) 1317-1336
  • 5 Pender DJ. A Model Design for the Labyrinthine Membranes in Mammals. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: E245-E249
  • 6 Fung YC. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1993
  • 7 Fryer DM, Harvey JF. High Pressure Vessels. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1998
  • 8 Pender DJ. A model analysis of static stress in the vestibular membranes. Theor Biol Med Model 2009; 6: 19
  • 9 Nave CR . Hyperphysics. Available at: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/ptens3.html. Accessed on July 26, 2014
  • 10 Pender DJ . Electrical Units of Measurement, Popular Lectures and Addresses 1889 1. 80-81
  • 11 Pender DJ. A model analysis of tensile stress in the toadfish vestibular membranes. Int J Otolaryngol 2011; 2011: 519293
  • 12 Kuraku S, Kuratani S. Time scale for cyclostome evolution inferred with a phylogenetic diagnosis of hagfish and lamprey cDNA sequences. Zoolog Sci 2006; 23 (12) 1053-1064
  • 13 Guggenheim LK. Phylogenesis of the Ear. Murray & Gee: Culver City, 1948
  • 14 Okuno T, Sando I. Localization, frequency, and severity of endolymphatic hydrops and the pathology of the labyrinthine membrane in Menière's disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 96 (4) 438-445