Überblick – Grundlagenwissen zum motorischen Lernen

Zusammenfassung

Bewegungen sind die einzige Möglichkeit des Menschen, mit seiner Umwelt zu interagieren (z. B. Sprechen, Gesten oder Objektmanipulationen). Wie wichtig Bewegungen sind, fällt häufig erst auf, wenn motorische Störungen vorliegen. Andererseits ist es durch jahrelanges Training in Sport oder Musik möglich, Bewegungen in einer Art und Weise auszuführen, die für den Laien unvorstellbar ist. In diesem Beitrag werden Befunde zum motorischen Lernen aus der Sportwissenschaft, der Psychologie und der Neurowissenschaft aufgearbeitet und im Kontext der Neurorehabilitation diskutiert.

• Literatur

• 1 Bartenbach V, Sander C, Pöschl M. et al. The BioMotionBot – A robotic device for applications in human motor learning and rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2013; 213: 282-297
• 2 Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A. et al. Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke 2004; 35: 1005-1009
• 3 Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 1993; 100: 363-406
• 4 Hossner EJ, Müller H, Voelcker-Rehage C. Koordination sportlicher Bewegungen – Sportmotorik. In: Güllich A, Krüger M. Sport – das Lehrbuch für das Sportstudium. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013
• 5 Joiner WM, Brayanov JB, Smith MA. The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology 2013; 110: 984-998
• 6 Kantak SS, Winstein CJ. Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research 2012; 228: 219-231
• 7 Kernodle MW, Carlton LG. Information feedback and the learning of mulitple-degree-of-freedom activities. Journal of Motor Behavior 1992; 24: 187-196
• 8 Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P. Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2011; 21: 636-644
• 9 Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS. et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009; 90: 1692-1698
• 10 Lee TD, Magill RA. The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1983; 9: 730-746
• 11 Marschall F, Bund A, Wiemeyer J. Does frequent augmented feedback really degrade learning? A meta-analysis. E-Journal Bewegung und Training 2007; 1: 74-85
• 12 Maschke M, Gomez CM, Ebner TJ. et al. Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004; 91: 230-238
• 13 Newell KM, Rosenbloom PS. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson JR. Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1981
• 14 Porter JM, Magill RA. Systematically increasing contextual interference is beneficial for learning sport skills. Journal of Sports Sciences 2010; 28: 1277-1285
• 15 Robertson EM, Pascual-Leone A, Miall RC. Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004; 5: 576-582
• 16 Scheidt RA, Stoeckmann T. Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007; 97: 2824-2836
• 17 Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning. A behavioral Emphasis. 5th edition Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2011
• 18 Scott SH, Dukelow MD. Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2011; 48: 335-354
• 19 Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. Journal of Neuroscience 1997; 17: 409-419
• 20 Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience 1994; 14: 3208-3224
• 21 Shea JB, Morgan RL. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition 1979; 5: 179-187
• 22 Siegert RJ, Taylor KD, Weatherall M. et al. Is implicit sequence learning impaired in Parkinson’s disease? A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology 2006; 20: 490-495
• 23 Smith MA, Shadmehr R. Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington’s disease but not cerebellar degeneration. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005; 93: 2809-2821
• 24 Stockinger C, Focke A, Stein T. Catch trials in force field learning influence adaptation and consolidation of human motor memory. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014;
• 25 Swinnen SP, Nicholson DG, Schmidt RA. et al. Information feedback for skill acquisition: instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1990; 16: 706-716
• 26 Takahashi C, Reinkensmeyer D. Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement. Experimental Brain Research 2003; 149: 131-140
• 27 Tyc F, Boyadjian A, Devanne H. Motor cortex plasticity induced by extensive training revealed by TMS in human. European Journal of Neuroscience 2005; 21: 259-266
• 28 Tzetzis G, Votsis E, Kourtessis T. The effect of different corrective feedback methods on the outcome and self-confidence of young athletes. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2008; 7: 371-378
• 29 Wiemeyer J. Schlecht üben, um gut zu lernen?. Psychologie und Sport 1998; 5: 82-105
• 30 Winstein CJ, Stewart JC. Conditions of task practice for individuals with neurologic impairments. In: Selzer ME, Clarke S, Cohen LG. et al. Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation (Volume 2). Cambridge: University Press; 2006