Benefits of Digital Wireless Technology for Persons with Hearing Aids

Abstract

Wireless technology for persons with hearing loss began with cumbersome body-worn systems that nevertheless provided speech-recognition benefits in noisy environments. The first ear-level wireless systems were welcomed despite the awkward antenna that extended from the behind-the-ear case. The next-generation, removable, multichannel receiver provided a cost-effective means for school districts to maintain a stock of equipment to be used across students and classrooms. More recently, the advances have been less focused on physical size reductions and more focused on improvements to the signal quality in increasingly noisier environments. Two studies were designed to evaluate the new technological features by Phonak (Phonak, Warrenville, IL) known as adaptive FM and later adaptive digital processing. Each advance in technology resulted in greater gains in speech recognition in noise such that with the adaptive digital system, persons were able to achieve 48% correct in 80- decibels A weighted (dBA) noise levels. Persons with hearing loss using this technology are likely to hear more than persons with normal hearing in high-noise environments.

Keywords

Assistive technology - hearing impaired - FM technology - digital adaptive technology

• References

• 1 Thibodeau L. Physical components and features of FM systems. In: Ross M, , ed FM Auditory Training Systems: Characteristics, Selection, and Use. Timonium, MD: York Press, Inc; 1992
• 2 Thibodeau L. FM systems: terminology and standardization. Proceedings from the International Conference on Achieving Clear Communication by Employing Sound Solutions (ACCESS) Conference; November 10-12, 2003; Chicago, IL
• 3 Bondurant L, Thibodeau L. Behavioral verification of programmable FM advantage settings. J Educational Audiology 2001; 17: 11-22
• 4 American Academy of Audiology. AAA clinical practice guidelines: remote microphone technologies for children and youth from birth to 21 years. 2008 Available at: www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/documents/hatguideline.pdf . Accessed April 28, 2014
• 5 Platz R. SNR advantage, FM advantage, and FM fitting. In: Fabry DA, DeConde Johnson C, , eds. ACCESS: Achieving Clear Communication Employing Sound Solutions-2003. Proceedings of the First International FM Conference. Warrenville, IL: Phonak AG; 2004: 147-154
• 6 Bondurant LM, Thibodeau L. Behavioral verification of FM advantage settings. Journal of Educational Audiology 2011; 17: 11-22
• 7 Lewis D, Eiten L. Assessment of advanced hearing instrument and FM technology. In: Fabry DA, DeConde Johnson C, , eds. ACCESS: Achieving Clear Communication Employing Sound Solutions—2003. Proceedings of the First International FM Conference. Warrenville, IL: Phonak AG; 2004: 167-174
• 8 Thibodeau L. Benefits of adaptive FM systems on speech recognition in noise for listeners who use hearing aids. Am J Audiol 2010; 19 (1) 36-45
• 9 Thibodeau L. Comparison of speech recognition with adaptive digital and FM remote microphone hearing assistance technology by listeners who use hearing aids. Am J Audiol 2014; 23: 201-210
• 10 Wolfe J, Schafer EC, Heldner B, Mülder H, Ward E, Vincent B. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20 (7) 409-421
• 11 Wolfe J, Morais M, Schafer E , et al. Evaluation of speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients using a personal digital adaptive radio frequency system. J Am Acad Audiol 2013; 24 (8) 714-724
• 12 Schafer EC, Thibodeau LM. Speech recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal, and FM-system arrangements. Am J Audiol 2006; 15 (2) 114-126
• 13 Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA. Supplementary formulas and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed arcsine units. Int J Audiol 2004; 43 (8) 442-448
• 14 Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Stat Med 1997; 16 (22) 2529-2542