Aktuelle Kardiologie 2014; 3(6): 365-369
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383309
Übersichtsarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Körperliches Training in der Sekundärprävention kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen – sind die Guidelines noch aktuell?

Exercise Training in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Are the Guidelines Still up to Date?
C. Suchy
1   Lehrstuhl für Prävention, Rehabilitation und Sportmedizin am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
,
A. Pressler
1   Lehrstuhl für Prävention, Rehabilitation und Sportmedizin am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
,
M. Halle
1   Lehrstuhl für Prävention, Rehabilitation und Sportmedizin am Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
2   DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, München, Deutschland
3   Else Kröner-Fresenius-Zentrum, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 December 2014 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Körperliches Training ist fester Bestandteil der leitliniengerechten Therapie kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen. Dabei hat ein kombiniertes Ausdauer- und Krafttraining positive Effekte auf körperliche Belastbarkeit, Lebensqualität und Prognose. Das Ausdauertraining beschränkt sich bisher weitgehend auf moderate Intensitäten, obwohl es Hinweise gibt, dass ein Intervalltraining mit vergleichbaren bis sogar besseren Ergebnissen verbunden ist. Studien deuten u. a. darauf hin, dass Intervalltraining bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz nicht nur zu einer effektiveren Leistungssteigerung, sondern auch zu günstigen strukturellen und funktionellen kardialen Veränderungen führt. Bei metabolischem Syndrom scheint durch Intervalltraining ein noch günstigerer Effekt auf den Stoffwechsel, z. B. durch Erhöhung der Insulinsensitivität, induziert zu werden. Bevor ein genereller Umbruch von moderatem Training zu Intervalltraining durchgeführt werden sollte, bedarf es allerdings noch deutlich umfassenderer Evidenz. Zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt sollte ein Einsatz von Intervalltraining im klinischen Alltag noch eher zurückhaltend und nach klinischer Abwägung erfolgen.

Abstract

Physical training is an inherent part of guideline-based therapy of cardiovascular diseases. Combined endurance and resistance training has positive effects on exercise capacity, quality of life and prognosis. Endurance training has so far been limited to moderate intensities, although there is evidence that interval training has comparable or even better results. Studies indicate that interval training in heart-failure-patients induces more effective increase in exercise performance, but moreover also yields favorable structural and functional cardiac changes. Interval training in metabolic syndrome seems to induce even more favorable metabolic effects, e.g. by increasing insulin sensitivity. Before a general recommendation for interval training can be given, more comprehensive evidence is required. At present interval training in clinical practice can be applied after careful clinical assessment and in a supervised setting.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Prävention und Rehabilitation von Herz-Kreislauferkrankungen e.V. (DGPR), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rehabilitationswissenschaften e.V. (DGRW), d.D.V.f.G. Leitlinie körperliche Aktivität zur Sekundärprävention und Therapie kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen. Clin Res Cardiol Suppl 2009; 4: 1-44
  • 2 Vanhees L, Rauch B, Piepoli M et al. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular disease (Part III). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012; 19: 1333-1356
  • 3 Leon AS, Franklin BA, Costa F et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in collaboration with the American association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2005; 111: 369-376
  • 4 Saunamaki KI. Feasibility and effect of physical training with maximum intensity in men after acute myocardial infarction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1978; 10: 155-162
  • 5 Haykowsky MJ, Timmons MP, Kruger C et al. Meta-analysis of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111: 1466-1469
  • 6 Karstoft K, Winding K, Knudsen SH et al. The effects of free-living interval-walking training on glycemic control, body composition, and physical fitness in type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 228-236
  • 7 Moholdt TT, Amundsen BH, Rustad LA et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 1031-1037
  • 8 Munk PS, Staal EM, Butt N et al. High-intensity interval training may reduce in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation A randomized controlled trial evaluating the relationship to endothelial function and inflammation. Am Heart J 2009; 158: 734-741
  • 9 Pattyn N, Coeckelberghs E, Buys R et al. Aerobic interval training vs. moderate continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2014; 44: 687-700
  • 10 Rognmo Ø, Hetland E, Helgerud J et al. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004; 11: 216-222
  • 11 Smart NA, Dieberg G, Giallauria F. Intermittent versus continuous exercise training in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2013; 166: 352-358
  • 12 Tjønna AE, Lee SJ, Rognmo Ø et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise as a treatment for the metabolic syndrome: a pilot study. Circulation 2008; 118: 346-354
  • 13 Guazzi M, Adams V, Conraads V et al. EACPR/AHA Scientific Statement. Clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation 2012; 126: 2261-2274
  • 14 Rognmo Ø, Moholdt T, Bakken H et al. Cardiovascular risk of high- versus moderate-intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients. Circulation 2012; 126: 1436-1440
  • 15 Vanhees L, Geladas N, Hansen D et al. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors: recommendations from the EACPR. Part II. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012; 19: 1005-1033
  • 16 Lee IM, Sesso HD, Oguma Y et al. Relative intensity of physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease. Circulation 2003; 107: 1110-1116
  • 17 Edelmann F, Gelbrich G, Düngen HD et al. Exercise training improves exercise capacity and diastolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results of the Ex-DHF (Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure) pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 1780-1791
  • 18 Pressler A. Training bei Herzinsuffizienz: Intervall oder Ausdauer?. Herzmedizin 2013; 2: 24-30
  • 19 Piepoli MF, Conraads V, Corrà U et al. Exercise training in heart failure: from theory to practice. A consensus document of the Heart Failure Association and the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Heart Fail 2011; 13: 347-357