Download PDF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014; 74(11): 995-1002
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383297
Review
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Progesterone in Peri- and Postmenopause: A Review

Progesteron in der Peri-und Postmenopause – ein Überblick
P.-A. Regidor
1   Praxis für Frauenheilkunde, München
2   Velvian GmbH, Ismaning
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 27 January 2014
revised 01 October 2014

accepted 01 October 2014

Publication Date:
26 November 2014 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Around 14.5 million peri- and postmenopausal women currently live in Germany. Moreover, approximately 450 000 women, each with a life expectancy of around 85 years, reach menopause every year in Germany. The challenge is therefore to find a therapy with few side effects which could improve the quality of life of women with menopausal symptoms. The aim of hormone therapy (HT) is to remedy hormone deficiencies using substances that offer the best trade-off between benefits and risks. This is where progesterone has a new and important role to play. Progesterone is one of the most important gestagens. Biologically effective progesterone formulations created with micronization techniques have been used in clinical practice since 1996. Nevertheless, up until 2003 preference was given to synthetic gestagens rather than progesterone. The increased breast cancer hazard ratio of 1.23 reported in the WHI study and of 2 given in the Million Women Study has been associated with the use of synthetic gestagens. In a comparison between synthetic gestagens and progesterone, the E3N Study showed that the transdermal administration of estrogen and progesterone did not lead to an increase in breast cancer rates (RR: 1.08). The administration of progesterone does not change the HDL/LDL cholesterol ratio. Because of its anti-mineralocorticoid effect, progesterone has no impact on carbohydrate metabolism, hemostasis, blood pressure, thrombogenicity and body weight. The administration of 200 mg/day progesterone over 12 days of a menstrual cycle or a daily administration of 100 mg combined with an estrogen are a safe and well-tolerated option to treat menopausal symptoms, with a better benefit risk profile compared to synthetic gestagens.

Zusammenfassung

Aktuell leben 14,5 Millionen peri- und postmenopausale Frauen in Deutschland. Gleichzeitig gibt es ungefähr 450 000 neue menopausale Frauen pro Jahr, die eine Lebenserwartung von bis zu 85 Jahren haben. Die Herausforderung besteht daher in einer möglichst nebenwirkungsarmen Therapie bei den Frauen mit menopausalen Beschwerden, um einer Verschlechterung ihrer Lebensqualität entgegenzuwirken. Ziel einer Hormontherapie (HT) sollte die Behebung des Hormonmangels sein, wobei Substanzen mit dem besten Nutzen-Risiko-Profil eingesetzt werden sollten. Hier spielt Progesteron eine neue und wichtige Rolle. Beim Progesteron handelt es sich um den wichtigsten Vertreter der Gestagene. Durch Mikronisierungsverfahren können biologisch wirksame Formulierungen hergestellt werden, sodass es seit 1996 Anwendung im klinischen Alltag findet. Dennoch wurde bis 2003 den synthetischen Gestagenen und nicht dem Progesteron der Vorzug gegeben. Die Erhöhungen des Mammakarzinomrisikos in der WHI-Studie auf eine Ratio von 1,23 und in der Million-Women-Studie auf bis zu 2 sind daher auch unter diesem Aspekt zu werten. Beim Vergleich zwischen synthetischen Gestagenen und Progesteron konnte in der E3N-Studie gezeigt werden, dass es unter einer transdermalen Östrogengabe zusammen mit Progesteron nicht zu einer Erhöhung der Mammakarzinomrate (RR von 1,08) kommt. Progesteron verändert nicht die HDL/LDL-Cholesterinratio. Es hat keinen Einfluss auf den Kohlenhydratstoffwechsel, die Hämostase, den Blutdruck, die Thrombogenität und das Körpergewicht, da es auch antimineralokortikoid wirkt. Die Gabe von 200 mg Progesteron pro Tag über 12 Tage im Zyklus oder die tägliche Gabe von 100 mg in Kombination mit einem Östrogen stellen daher eine sichere Option in der Behandlung der menopausalen Beschwerden dar, bei gleichzeitig besserem Nutzen-Risiko-Profil als die synthetischen Gestagene.

Key words

hormone therapy - progesterone - menopause - menopausal symptoms

Schlüsselwörter

Hormontherapie - Progesteron - Menopause - Wechseljahresbeschwerden

Supporting Information

 

  • References

  • 1 Williams CL, Stancel GM. Estrogens and Progestins. In: Goodman LS, Gilman A, eds. The pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 9th ed. Elmsford, Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1996: 1411-1440
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Millart P, Paszkowski T. Progestageny w praktyee ginekologieznej. Ginekol Prakt 2002; 67: 16-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Paszkowski T, Kozlowska J. Progesteron-druga mlodosc starego leku. Ginekol Prakt 2003; 70: 52-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Loose DS, Stancel GM. Estrogens and Progestins. In: Brunton LL, eds. Goodman & Gilmanʼs the pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006: 1541-1571
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Morville R, Dray F, Reynier J et al. Biodisponibilité de la progestérone naturelle administrée par voie orale. Mesure des concentrations du stéroide dans le plasma, lʼendomêtre et le tissue mammaire. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1982; 11: 355-363
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Speroff L, Glass RH, Kase NL eds. Clinical gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. Baltimore, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Ottosson UB, Carlstrom K, Damber JE et al. Serum levels of progesterone and some of its metabolites including deoxycorticosterone after oral and parenteral administration. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 91: 1111-1119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Di Lignieres B, Dennerstein L, Backstrom T. Influence of route of administration on progesterone metabolism. Maturitas 1995; 21: 251-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Andréen L, Spigset O, Andersson A et al. Pharmacokinetics of progesterone and its metabolites allopregnanolone and pregnanolone after oral administration of low-dose progesterone. Maturitas 2006; 54: 238-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Birziece V, Bäckström T, Johansson IM et al. Neuroactive steroid effects on cognitive functions with a focus on the serotonin and GABA systems. Brain Res Rev 2006; 51: 212-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Paszkowski T. Renaissance of the clinical applications of a progesterone. Gin Politec Project 2011; 19: 41-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Maxson WS, Hargrove JT. Bioavailability of oral micronized progesterone. Fertil Steril 1985; 5: 622-626
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Situr-Ware R, Bricairec C, De Lignieres B et al. Oral micronized progesterone. Contraception 1987; 36: 373-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Simon J, Robinson DE, Andrews MC et al. The absorption of oral micronized progesterone: the effect of food, dose proportionality and comparison with intramuscular progesterone. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 26-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Barbieri RL. The endocrinology of the menstrual cycle. Methods Mol Biol 2014; 1154: 145-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Tapia-Pizarro A, Figueroa P, Brito J et al. Endometrial gene expression reveals compromised progesterone signaling in women refractory to embryo implantation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12: 92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lessey BA, Young SL. Homeostasis imbalance in the endometrium of women with implantation defects: the role of estrogen and progesterone. Semin Reprod Med 2014; 32: 365-375
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Spencer TE, Bazer FW. Biology of progesterone action during pregnancy recognition and maintenance of pregnancy. Front Biosci 2002; 7: d1879-d1898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Garfield RE, Shi L, Shi SQ. Use of progesterone and progestin analogs for inhibition of preterm birth and other uterine contractility disorders. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2012; 4: 237-244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gáspár R, Ducza E, Mihálvi A et al. Pregnancy-induced decrease in the relaxant effect of terbutaline in the late-pregnant rat myometrium: role of G-protein activation and progesterone. Reproduction 2005; 130: 113-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gálik M, Gáspár R, Kolarovszki-Sipiczki Z et al. Gestagen treatment enhances the tocolytic effect of salmeterol in hormone-induced preterm labor in the rat in vivo. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 319.e1-319.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kowalewski MP, Beceriklisoy HB, Asla S et al. Time related changes in luteal prostaglandin synthesis and steroidogenic capacity during pregnancy, normal and antiprogestin induced luteolysis in the bitch. Anim Reprod Sci 2009; 116: 129-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Haslam SZ. Experimental mouse model of hormonal therapy effects on the postmenopausal mammary gland. Breast Dis 2005; 24: 71-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cline JM, Wood CE. Hormonal effects on the mammary gland of postmenopausal nonhuman primates. Breast Dis 2005; – 2006; 24: 59-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lactation. Bull World Health Organ 1989; 67 (Suppl.) 19-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Check JH. Premature ovarian insufficiency - fertility challenge. Minerva Ginecol 2014; 66: 133-153
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. The clinical relevance of luteal phase deficiency: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 1112-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Moberg C, Bourlev V, Ilyasova N et al. Levels of ostrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and αB-crystallin in eutopic endometrium in relation to pregnancy in women with endometriosis. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2014; 19: 1-8 [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Narin R, Nazik H, Aytan H et al. Effects of natural progesterone on endometriosis in an experimental rat model: is it effective?. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2014; 41: 455-459
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pasqualini JR. Progestins in the menopause in healthy women and breast cancer patients. Maturitas 2009; 62: 343-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ziomkiewicz A, Pawlowski B, Ellison PT et al. Higher luteal progesterone is associated with low levels of premenstrual aggressive behavior and fatigue. Biol Psychol 2012; 91: 376-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Vaisbuch E, de Ziegler D, Leong M et al. Luteal-phase support in assisted reproduction treatment: real-life practices reported worldwide by an updated website-based survey. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 28: 330-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Arredondo F, Noble LS. Endocrinology of recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med 2006; 24: 33-39
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 The Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on endometrial histology in postmenopausal woman. The postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) trial. JAMA 1996; 275: 370-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Fitzpatrick LA, Pace C, Wiita B. Comparison of regimens containing oral micronized progesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate on quality of life in postmenopausal woman: a cross-sectional study. J Womenʼs Health Gender-based Med 2000; 9: 381-387
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ryan N, Rosner A. Quality of life and costs associated with micronized progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate in hormone replacement therapy for nonhysterectomized, postmenopausal women. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1099-1115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Cummings JA, Brizendine L. Comparison of physical and emotional side effects of progesterone or medroxyprogesterone in early postmenopausal women. Menopause 2002; 9: 254-263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schindler AE. Einsatz von Gestagenen in der Schwangerschaft. Therapeutische und präventive Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Frauenarzt 2005; 46: 586-589
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Malet C, Spritzer P, Guillaumin D et al. Progesterone effect on cell growth, ultrastructural aspect and estradiol receptors of normal human breast epithelial (HABE) cells in culture. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2000; 73: 1319-1330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Groshong SD, Owen GI, Grimison B et al. Biphasic regulation of breast cancer cell growth by progesterone: role of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p 21 and p 27(Kip1). Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11: 1593-1607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Soderqvist G, von Schoultz B, Tani E et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor content in breast epithelial cells from healthy women during the menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 874-879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 De Lignieres B. Effects of progestogens on the postmenopausal breast. Climacteric 2002; 5: 229-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Foidart JM, Colin C, Denoo X et al. Estradiol and progesterone regulate the proliferation of human breast epithelial cells. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 963-969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Formby B, Wiley TS. BcI-2, surviving and variat CD44 v7-vlO are downregulated and p 53 is upregulated in breast cancer cells by progesterone: inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis. Mol Cell Biochem 1999; 202: 53-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lorrain J, Lalumiere LG, Caron P. The effects of oral micronized progesterone on bleeding patterns, endometrial histology and bone density in postmenopausal woman on hormone replacement therapy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994; 46: 77-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Pélissier C, Maroni M, Yaneva H et al. Chlormadinone acetate versus micronized progesterone in the sequential combined hormone replacement therapy of the menopause. Maturitas 2001; 40: 85-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Göretzlehner G, Lauritzen C, Römer T, Rossmanith W. Praktische Hormontherapie in der Gynäkologie. 6. Aufl.. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2011: 44
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Writing Group for the Womenʼs Health Initiative Investigators. Risks and benefits of estrogen and progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. Principal results from the Womenʼs Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 321-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Million Women Study Collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone replacement in the Million Women Study. Lancet 2003; 362: 419-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Rajkumar L, Canada A, Esparza D et al. Decreasing hormonal protection is key to breast cancer prevention. Endocrine 2009; 35: 220-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Seeger H, Wallwiener D, Mueck AO. The effect of progesterone and synthetic progestins on serum- and estradiol-stimulated proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Horm Metab Res 2003; 35: 76-80
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Franke HR, Vermes I. Differential effects of progestogens on breast cancer cell lines. Maturitas 2003; 46 (Suppl. 01) 555-558
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Mueck AO, Seeger H, Wallwiener D. Comparison of the proliferative effects of estradiol and conjugated equine estrogens on human breast cancer cells and impact of continuous combined progestogen addition. Climacteric 2003; 6: 221-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Otto C, Fuchs I, Vonk R et al. Comparative analysis of the uterine and mammary gland effects of progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate. Maturitas 2010; 65: 386-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Murkes D, Conner P, Leifland K. Effects of percutaneous estradiol-oral progesterone versus oral conjugated equine estrogens-medroxyprogesterone acetate on breast cell proliferation and bcl-2 protein in healthy women. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1188-1191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al. Mammographic density and the risk and reduction of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 227-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, Haeberle L et al. Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer in a German case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2011; 20: 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Boyd NF, Melnichouk O, Martin LJ et al. Mammographic density, response to hormones, and breast cancer risk. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 2985-2992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Carmona-Sánchez E, Cuadros López JL, Cuadros Celerrio ÁM et al. Assessment of mammographic density in postmenopausal women during long term hormone replacement therapy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013; 29: 1067-1070
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Brand JS, Czene K, Erikson L et al. Influence of lifestyle factors on mammographic density in postmenopausal women. PLoS One 2013; 8: e81876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Chen WY, Colditz GA, Rosner B et al. Use of postmenopausal hormones, alcohol, and risk for invasive breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 798-804
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Kanaya AM, Herrington D, Vittinghoff E et al. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study: Glycemic effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy: the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study. A randomized, doubled-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Fournier A, Berrino F, Clavel-Chapelon F. Unequal risks for breast cancer associated with different hormone replacement therapies: results from the E3N cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 107: 103-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimes on heart disease. Risks factors in postmenopausal women. JAMA 1995; 273: 199-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Saarikoski S, Yliskoski M, Penttilä I. Sequential use of norethisterone and natural progesterone in pre-menopausal bleeding disorders. Maturitas 1990; 12: 89-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Freeman E, Rickels K, Sondheimer SJ et al. A double-blind trial of oral progesterone, alprazolam and placebo in treatment of severe premenstrual syndrome. JAMA 1995; 274: 51-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Dennerstein L, Spencer Gardner C, Gotts G et al. Progesterone and the premenstrual syndrome: a double-blind crossover trial. Br Med J 1985; 290: 1617-1621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Freeman EW, Weinstock L, Rickels K et al. A placebo-controlled study of effects of oral progesterone on performance and mood. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 33: 293-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Schumacher M, Guennoun R, Ghoumari A et al. Novel perspectives for progesterone in hormone replacement therapy, with special reference to the nervous system. Endocr Rev 2007; 28: 387-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Eser D, Schüle C, Baghai TC et al. Neuroactive steroids and affective disorders. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2006; 84: 656-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Herzog AG. Reproductive endocrine considerations and hormonal therapy for women with epilepsy. Epilepsia 1991; 32: 527-533
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Wharton W, Gleason CE, Miller VM et al. Rationale and design of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS) and the KEEPS cognitive and affective sub study (KEEPS Cog). Brain Res 2013; 1514: 12-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Schindler AE, Campagnoli C, Druckmann R et al. Classification and pharmacology of progestins. Maturitas 2003; 46: 7-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar