Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63(07): 609-613
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377061
Original Thoracic
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Cardiomegaly Is a Significant Predictor of Postoperative Atelectasis following Left Upper Superior Segmentectomy

Yoshikazu Miyasaka
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kenji Suzuki
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Shiaki Oh
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kazuya Takamochi
1   Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 January 2014

24 March 2014

Publication Date:
19 August 2014 (online)

Abstract

Background Segmentectomy is becoming more common since many lung cancers are small when found. Left upper superior segmentectomy (LUSS) is the most popular procedure for segmentectomy. Atelectasis is a common postoperative complication following segmentectomy. In this study, we sought to better understand atelectasis of the lingular segment following LUSS.

Materials and Methods Among 265 patients who underwent segmentectomy of the lung at our institute between February 2008 and August 2012, 60 patients who underwent LUSS were investigated retrospectively. An intersegmental plane was created using a stapler in 41 and by cautery in 19. The relationships between atelectasis of the lingular segment and clinical factors were analyzed by multivariate analysis. The clinical factors examined included body mass index, preoperative cardio/thoracic dimension ratio (CTR), preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the method used to make an intersegmental plane, the interval of thoracic drainage, and the degree of lobulation.

Results Atelectasis of the lingular segment was seen in nine (15.0%) patients. Preoperative CTR predicted atelectasis of the lingular segment (p = 0.004). FEV1 was preserved in 73.8% of patients with atelectasis of the lingular segment and in 86.8% of the controls. This difference was significant (p = 0.027). Atelectasis of the middle lobe following RUL was seen in 10/238 (4.2%) within the same period.

Conclusions Preoperative CTR was related to atelectasis of the lingular segment. One of the advantages of segmentectomy is that it enables the postoperative preservation of respiratory function. However, in patients with cardiomegaly, respiratory function following LUSS may be preserved less than expected.

Note

This study was presented at the 21st European Conference on General Thoracic Surgery, Birmingham, United Kingdom, May 26–29, 2013.


 
  • References

  • 1 Tsubota N, Ayabe K, Doi O , et al; Study Group of Extended Segmentectomy for Small Lung Tumor. Ongoing prospective study of segmentectomy for small lung tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66 (5) 1787-1790
  • 2 Okada M, Koike T, Higashiyama M, Yamato Y, Kodama K, Tsubota N. Radical sublobar resection for small-sized non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (4) 769-775
  • 3 Kodama K, Doi O, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H. Intentional limited resection for selected patients with T1 N0 M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-institution study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114 (3) 347-353
  • 4 Yoshikawa K, Tsubota N, Kodama K, Ayabe H, Taki T, Mori T. Prospective study of extended segmentectomy for small lung tumors: the final report. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73 (4) 1055-1058 , discussion 1058–1059
  • 5 Jones DR, Stiles BM, Denlinger CE, Antippa P, Daniel TM. Pulmonary segmentectomy: results and complications. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76 (2) 343-348 , discussion 348–349
  • 6 Miyasaka Y, Oh S, Takahashi N, Takamochi K, Suzuki K. Postoperative complications and respiratory function following segmentectomy of the lung - comparison of the methods of making an inter-segmental plane. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12 (3) 426-429
  • 7 Stolz AJ, Schutzner J, Lischke R, Simonek J, Harustiak T, Pafko P. Predictors of atelectasis after pulmonary lobectomy. Surg Today 2008; 38 (11) 987-992
  • 8 Irani B, Miller JE, Linberg E, Attar S. Use of radiopaque markings on middle lobe (or lingula) following upper resectional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1968; 5 (1) 1-7
  • 9 Nakamura K, Saji H, Nakajima R , et al. A phase III randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for small-sized peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010; 40 (3) 271-274
  • 10 Harada H, Okada M, Sakamoto T, Matsuoka H, Tsubota N. Functional advantage after radical segmentectomy versus lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80 (6) 2041-2045
  • 11 Okada M, Mimura T, Ikegaki J, Katoh H, Itoh H, Tsubota N. A novel video-assisted anatomic segmentectomy technique: selective segmental inflation via bronchofiberoptic jet followed by cautery cutting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133 (3) 753-758
  • 12 Eguchi T, Takasuna K, Kitazawa A , et al. Three-dimensional imaging navigation during a lung segmentectomy using an iPad. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41 (4) 893-897
  • 13 Oh S, Suzuki K, Miyasaka Y, Matsunaga T, Tsushima Y, Takamochi K. New technique for lung segmentectomy using indocyanine green injection. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95 (6) 2188-2190
  • 14 Wong PS, Goldstraw P. Pulmonary torsion: a questionnaire survey and a survey of the literature. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54 (2) 286-288
  • 15 Cable DG, Deschamps C, Allen MS , et al. Lobar torsion after pulmonary resection: presentation and outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122 (6) 1091-1093