Ridgepreservation

Zusammenfassung

Die Socket- bzw. Ridgepreservation verhindert nicht Umbau- und oder Resorptionsvorgänge nach der Extraktion von Zähnen! Neben der Sofortimplantation bietet vor allem die Füllung von leeren Zahnfächern mit Füllmaterialien (z. B. Knochenersatzmaterialien) direkt nach der Extraktion eine chirurgisch einfache und wenig kostenintensive Methode, um den 3-dimensionalen Erhalt der Hart- und Weichgewebsstrukturen zu verbessern. Dadurch haben verzögerte Implantationen auch eine Aussicht auf bessere ästhetische Ergebnisse, allenfalls notwendige Augmentationen starten bei vorteilhafteren Ausgangssituationen und rein prothetische Versorgungen bauen auf einer resorptionsstabileren Basis auf.

Abstract

Socket or ridge preservation procedures cannot avoid resorption processes following tooth extraction! Besides immediate implant placement, filling of the extraction socket seems to be a valid procedure to decelerate ongoing resorption processes. The use of bone substitutes improves the 3-dimensional hard and soft tissue situation in a very simple and cost-effective way. Following ridge preservation techniques, delayed implant placement will lead to better esthetics, the initial situation for following augmentation procedures is promising, and prosthodontics restorations rest on a resorption-stable underground.

Schlüsselwörter

Socketpreservation - Ridgepreservation

Key words

socket preservation - ridge preservation

• Literatur

• 1 Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 433-440
• 2 Ackermann KL. Extraction site management using a natural bone ­mineral containing collagen: rationale and retrospective case study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009; 29: 489-497
• 3 Wang RE, Lang NP. New insights into ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 06) 147-156
• 4 Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Perio­dontol 2003; 30: 809-818
• 5 Atwood DA, Coy WA. Clinical, cephalometric, and densitometric study of reduction of residual ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 26: 280-295
• 6 Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17: 232-236
• 7 Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (Suppl. 05) 1-21
• 8 Special Issue: Proceedings of the 3^rd EAO Consensus Conference, 15–18 February 2012, Pfäffikon, Schwyz, Switzerland, Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, Volume 23, Issue Supplement s6, v–vi, 1–241
• 9 Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL et al. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 645-652
• 10 Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 43-61
• 11 Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T et al. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral ­Implants Res 2005; 16: 639-644