Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin 2014; 15 - PA48
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1374273

Therapeutic TouchTM in a geriatric palliative care unit – A retrospective review (the role of therapeutic touch in symptoms relief in terminally ill patients and it's impact on Palliative care unit)

H Senderovich 1, ML Ip 2, L Dunal 2, 3, H Kuttner 4, A Berall 2, J Karuza 2, 3, M Gordon 2, 3, J Tordjman 2, D Grossman 2, 3
  • 1Baycrest Centre for Geriatric care, Ontario, Kanada
  • 2Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Kanada
  • 3University of Toronto, Toronto, Kanada
  • 4Baycrest Health Sciences, Therapeutic Touch Network Ontario, Toronto, Kanada

Introduction: Complementary therapies are increasingly used in palliative care as an adjunct to the standard management of symptoms to achieve an overall well-being for patients with malignant and non-malignant terminal illnesses. A Therapeutic Touch Program was introduced to a geriatric Palliative Care Unit in October 2010. Two volunteer Therapeutic Touch Practitioners offer the therapy to patients who have given verbal consent.

Objective: To conduct a retrospective review of Therapeutic Touch services provided to patients in an in-patient geriatric palliative care unit to better understand the impact of the Therapeutic Touch Program on patient care.

Methods: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted on both patients who received Therapeutic Touch as well as a random selection of patients who did not receive Therapeutic Touch.

Client characteristics and the Therapeutic Touch Practitioners' observations of the patient's response were collected. Descriptive analyses were conducted on all variables.

Results: Patients who did not receive Therapeutic Touch tended to have lower admitting Palliative Performance Scale scores, shorter length of stay and were older.

Based on the responses provided by patients and observed by Therapeutic Touch practitioner the majority of patients receiving treatment achieved a state of relaxation or sleep.

Conclusions: The results of our chart review suggest beneficial effects for significant numbers of participants and deserve a more robust comparison study in future. Recommendations also include revising the program procedures to improve processes and documentation, and ensure all or most patients are offered the therapy.