J Knee Surg 2015; 28(02): 151-156
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1373741
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Barbed Sutures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are These Safe, Efficacious, and Cost-Effective?

Aditya V. Maheshwari
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Qais Naziri
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York
2   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Andy Wong
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Ivan Burko
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Michael A. Mont
2   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Vijay J. Rasquinha
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

14 January 2014

11 February 2014

Publication Date:
24 April 2014 (online)

Abstract

The use of barbed sutures has become increasingly popular; however, their efficacy and safety continues to be debated. We review the records of 333 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) to determine the difference in wound closure and total operative time between patients closed with a barbed versus standard sutures. We also evaluated complication rates and cost differences between the two groups. Overall, we saw no significant difference in either wound closure time (31 vs. 30 minutes) or total operative time (115 vs. 114 minutes). No significant differences were observed in the complication rate. Material costs were lower overall in the barbed suture group ($66.78 vs. 82.59). Further studies will be required to determine the role of barbed sutures in TKA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (10) 2606-2612
  • 2 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (4) 780-785
  • 3 Eggers MD, Fang L, Lionberger DR. A comparison of wound closure techniques for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (8) 1251-1258 , e1–e4
  • 4 de Blacam C, Colakoglu S, Momoh AO, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Early experience with barbed sutures for abdominal closure in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Eplasty 2012; 12: e24
  • 5 McKenzie AR. An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palm and fingers. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967; 49 (3) 440-447
  • 6 Murtha AP, Kaplan AL, Paglia MJ, Mills BB, Feldstein ML, Ruff GL. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (6) 1769-1780
  • 7 Paul MD. Barbed sutures for aesthetic facial plastic surgery: indications and techniques. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (3) 451-461
  • 8 Sulamanidze M. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (1) 349-350 , author reply 350
  • 9 Zaruby J, Gingras K, Taylor J, Maul D. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (2) 232-240
  • 10 Vakil JJ, O'Reilly MP, Sutter EG, Mears SC, Belkoff SM, Khanuja HS. Knee arthrotomy repair with a continuous barbed suture: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (5) 710-713
  • 11 Eickmann T, Quane E. Total knee arthroplasty closure with barbed sutures. J Knee Surg 2010; 23 (3) 163-167
  • 12 Nett M, Avelar R, Sheehan M, Cushner F. Water-tight knee arthrotomy closure: comparison of a novel single bidirectional barbed self-retaining running suture versus conventional interrupted sutures. J Knee Surg 2011; 24 (1) 55-59
  • 13 Stephens S, Politi J, Taylor BC. Evaluation of primary total knee arthroplasty incision closure with the use of continuous bidirectional barbed suture. Surg Technol Int 2011; XXI: 199-203
  • 14 Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN. The new Knee Society Knee Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (1) 3-19
  • 15 Ting NT, Moric MM, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR. Use of knotless suture for closure of total hip and knee arthroplasties: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (10) 1783-1788
  • 16 Smith EL, Disegna ST, Shukla PY, Matzkin EG. Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (2) 283-287
  • 17 Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Sun G, Erickson JA, Peters CL. Perioperative closure-related complication rates and cost analysis of barbed suture for closure in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (1) 125-129
  • 18 Patel RM, Cayo M, Patel A, Albarillo M, Puri L. Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (5) e641-e646
  • 19 Campbell AL, Patrick Jr DA, Liabaud B, Geller JA. Superficial wound closure complications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (5) 966-969