Kardiale Magnetresonanztomografie

W. Burchert; H. Esdorn; K.-T. Laser; H. Körperich; J. Körfer

doi:10.1055/s-0034-1371846

Der Nuklearmediziner, Table of Contents

Der Nuklearmediziner 2014; 37(02): 90-100
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1371846

MRT für Nuklearmediziner

Kardiale Magnetresonanztomografie

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Authors

W. Burchert

¹Institut für Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin und Molekulare Bildgebung, Herz- und Diabetes-Zentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen
H. Esdorn

¹Institut für Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin und Molekulare Bildgebung, Herz- und Diabetes-Zentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen
K.-T. Laser

²Kinderherzzentrum und Zentrum für angeborene Herzfehler, Herz- und Diabetes-Zentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen
H. Körperich

¹Institut für Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin und Molekulare Bildgebung, Herz- und Diabetes-Zentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen
J. Körfer

¹Institut für Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin und Molekulare Bildgebung, Herz- und Diabetes-Zentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Die kardiale Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) hat sich für die Diagnose, Prognose und das Management kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen in klinischen Routinefragestellungen bewährt. Wegen der Vielzahl der zur Verfügung stehenden unterschiedlichen Aufnahmetechniken und kontrastgebenden Aufnahmeparameter eignet sich dieses Verfahren nicht nur zur einfachen Darstellung kardiovaskulärer Strukturen und Lagebeziehungen, sondern erlaubt ebenfalls eine Untersuchung des kardialen Bewegungsmusters inklusive der hämodynamischen Abläufe. Zudem lassen sich funktionale kardiale Veränderungen durch den zusätzlichen, aber nicht zwingend erforderlichen, Einsatz paramagnetischer Kontrastmittel sichtbar machen. In diesem Beitrag werden, neben einem kurzen Überblick der Besonderheiten bei der MR-Herzbildgebung, einige der am häufigsten klinisch anzutreffenden kardiovaskulären Fragestellungen/Krankheitsbilder beschrieben.

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has been established for clinical practice in diagnosis, prognosis and in the management of diseases of the cardiovascular system. A wide range of different acquisition techniques and imaging parameters determining image contrast as well as its diversity in spatial slice positioning allows not only a visualization of cardiovascular structures in high spatial and temporal resolution as well as spatial relationships. Furthermore, CMR provides additional information related to cardiac motion and hemodynamics. Although non-obligatory, the application of paramagnetic contrast agents helps to detect functional and morphological changes in the heart and thoracic vessels. In a short overview some cardiac-specific characteristics for performing a typical heart examination are given. In addition, the most common types of cardiovascular diseases are described which have to be addressed in a normal MRI unit in a routine clinical setting.

Schlüsselwörter

Herz - Magnetresonanztomografie - kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen - Herzinsuffizienz - angeborene Herzfehler

Key words

heart - magnetic resonance imaging - cardiovascular disease - heart failure - congenital heart disease

Full Text

References

Literatur
1 Staat & gesellschaft – todesursachen – todesursachen – statistisches bundesamt (destatis) %u https://www.Destatis.De/de/zahlenfakten/gesellschaftstaat/gesundheit/todesursachen/tabellen/sterbefaelleinsgesamt.Html
2 Achenbach S, Barkhausen J, Beer M et al. Consensus recommendations of the german radiology society (drg), the german cardiac society (dgk) and the german society for pediatric cardiology (dgpk) on the use of cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. RöFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2012; 184: 345-368
3 Achenbach S, Barkhausen J, Beer M et al. Consensus recommendations of the german radiology society (drg), the german cardiac society (dgk) and the german society for pediatric cardiology (dgpk) on the use of cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo 2012; 184: 345-368
4 Asci CCT, Group CMRGW . Chan CWS et al. Asci 2010 standardized practice protocol for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A report of the asian society of cardiovascular imaging cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging guideline working group. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2010; 26: 187-202
5 Beerbaum P, Korperich H, Barth P et al. Noninvasive quantification of left-to-right shunt in pediatric patients: Phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging compared with invasive oximetry. Circulation 2001; 103: 2476-2482
6 Bruder O, Wagner A, Lombardi M et al. European cardiovascular magnetic resonance (eurocmr) registry – multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013; 15: 9
7 Dewey M. Coronary ct vs. mr angiography: Pro ct – the role of ct angiography. Radiology 2011; 258: 329-339
8 Dote K, Sato H, Tateishi H et al. myocardial stunning due to simultaneous multivessel coronary spasms: A review of 5 cases. J Cardiol 1991; 21: 203-214
9 Earls JP, Woodard PK, Abbara S et al. Acr appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2014; 11: 12-19
10 Feldman AM, McNamara D. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1388-1398
11 Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A jacc white paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 1475-1487
12 Gargiulo P, Dellegrottaglie S, Bruzzese D et al. The prognostic value of normal stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging 2013; 6: 574-582
13 Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC et al. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 29-34
14 Hamon M, Fau G, Née G et al. Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease. Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2010; 12: 29
15 Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER et al. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 372-383
16 Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. The New England journal of medicine 2000; 343: 1445-1453
17 Kindermann I, Barth C, Mahfoud F et al. Update on myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 779-792
18 Lamata P, Pitcher A, Krittian S et al. Aortic relative pressure components derived from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 2013;
19 Lipinski MJ, McVey CM, Berger JS et al. Prognostic value of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013; 62: 826-838
20 McAllister Jr HA, Fenoglio Jr JJ. Atlas of tumor pathology. Tumors of the cardiovascular system 1978; 1-39
21 Merkle N. Coronary artery disease – stable angina. In: Hombach V. ed. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Textbook and atlas. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2013. 91-114% @ 3794527992 9783794527991
22 Nagel E, Schwitter J. Cmr and detection of coronary artery disease. In: Zamorano JL, Bax JJ, Rademakers FE, Knuuti J. eds. The esc textbook of cardiovascular imaging. New York; London: Springer; 2009: 287-304
23 Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF et al. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2007; 50: 1343-1353
24 Pennell D, Sechtem U, Higgins C et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (cmr): Consensus panel report. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1940-1965
25 Romero J, Xue X, Gonzalez W et al. Cmr imaging assessing viability in patients with chronic ventricular dysfunction due to coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of prospective trials. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging 2012; 5: 494-508
26 Ronan G. Accf/aha/ase/asnc/hfsa/hrs/scai/scct/scmr/sts 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation appropriate use criteria task force, american heart association, american society of echocardiography, american society of nuclear cardiology, heart failure society of america, heart rhythm society, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of cardiovascular computed tomography, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and society of thoracic surgeons. Journal of nuclear cardiology: official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology 2013;
27 Schinkel AFL, Bax JJ, Poldermans D et al. Hibernating myocardium: Diagnosis and patient outcomes. Current problems in cardiology 2007; 32: 375-410