Download PDF
Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2014; 24(02): 87-91
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367022
Wissenschaft und Forschung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Efficacy of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Quadriceps Femoris Muscle in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Wirksamkeit neuromuskulärer Stimulation des M. quadriceps femoris bei Patienten mit Osteoarthritis des Knies
S. J. Kachanathu
1   College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA
,
B. Anand
2   Department of Physiotherapy, Ch.Charan Singh University, Meerut, India
,
S. Nuhmani
3   Department of Physiotherapy, Hamdard University, New Delhi, India
,
A. R. Hafez
4   Consultant, Cairo University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 21 May 2013

accepted 14 January 2014

Publication Date:
28 April 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives:

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used in rehabilitation protocols for patients suffering from muscle weakness. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of NMES on isometric quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle strength and functional outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods:

A total of 30 patients of OA with a mean age of 61.17±4.3 years were participated in the study. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned in to one of the 2 groups, group A and B (n=15) in each group. Patients in group-B were undergone NMES to the QF along with conventional physiotherapeutic regime for 3 weeks whereas, group-A was given only conventional physiotherapeutic regime. The study outcomes such as isometric strength at 20, 40 and 60° of knee flexion, mean isometric muscle strength and functional outcomes by WOMAC index score were measured at baseline, 9 days and end of 3 weeks of post intervention.

Results:

Comparison of quadriceps muscle strength at 20,40 and 60° and its mean in knee flexion and WOMAC index score were within group-A were non-significant (p>0.05) whereas, in group-B (p<0.05). The quadriceps muscle strength at 20° between groups at base line, 9th day and post test at 21st day showed significant improvement in NMES group (p<0.05). Similar difference was repeated with NMES group at 40 and 60° and WOMAC functional index score also.

Conclusions:

Study result indicates that NMES is effective in improving muscle strength thereby improving the functional activities of patients with knee OA. NMES along with conventional physiotherapeutic approach is a better choice for the management of knee OA.

Zusammenfassung

Zielstellung:

Neuromuskuläre elektrische Stimu­lation (NMES) wurde im Rahmen von Rehabilitationsprotokollen zur Therapie von Patienten mit Muskelschwäche eingesetzt. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war die Untersuchung des Effektes von NMES auf die isometrische Muskelkraft des Qua­driceps femoris (QF) sowie das funktionelle Outcome bei Patienten mit Osteoarthritis (OA) des Kniegelenks.

Methoden:

Insgesamt 30 unter OA leidende Patienten mit einem Durchschnittsalter von 61,17±4,3 Jahren nahmen an der Studie teil. Geeignete Teilnehmer wurden randomisiert und einer von 2 Gruppen, A oder B (n=25), zuge­wiesen. Die Patienten in Gruppe B erhielten NMES des QF im Verbindung mit konventioneller Physio­therapie für einen Zeitraum von 3 Wochen, während Gruppe A lediglich mit konventioneller Physiotherapie behandelt wurde. Die Erhebung der Messparameter wie isometrische Kraft bei 20, 40 und 60° Knieflexion, die durchschnittliche isometrische Muskelkraft und das funktionelle Assessment (WOMAC) erfolgte als Baseline, nach 9 Tagen und 3 Wochen nach Intervention.

Ergebnisse:

Der Vergleich der Quadrizeps-Muskelkraft bei 20, 40 sowie 60° und die mit­tlere Kraft bei Knieflexion sowie der WOMAC-Score in Gruppe A waren nicht signifikant (p>0,05) im Gegensatz zu den Werten in Gruppe B (p<0,05). Die Muskelkraft des Quadriceps bei 20°-Flexion zu Beginn, am 9. Tag sowie nach der Intervention am 21. Tag zeigten signifikante Verbesserungen innerhalb der NMES-Gruppe (p<0,05). Gleiche Ergebnisse der NMES-Gruppe konnten bei 40 und 60° sowie beim WOMAC Index Score nachgewiesen werden.

Schlussfolgerung:

Die Studienergebnisse weisen auf eine Wirksamkeit von NMES hinsichtlich der Verbesserung der Muskelkraft hin mit dem Ergebnis einer Verbesserung der funktionellen Akti­vitäten von Patienten mit Osteoarthritis des Knies. Zusammen mit konventioneller Physiotherapie bildet NMES eine bessere Option hinsichtlich der Therapie von Knie-OA.

Key words

osteoarthritis - neuromuscular stimulation - quadriceps strength - WOMAC

Schlüsselwörter

Osteoarthritis - neuromuskuläre Stimulation - Quadrizepskraft - WOMAC
 

  • References

  • 1 Bennell KL, Hinman RS. A review of the clinical evidence for exercise in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. J Sci Med Sport 2011; 14: 4-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Brooks PM. Impact of osteoarthritis on individuals and society: how much disability? Social consequences and health economic implications. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002; 14: 573-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chantraine A, Baribeault A, Uebelhart D et al. Shoulder pain and dysfunction in hemiplegia: effects of functional electrical stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 328-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Devos-Comby L, Cronan T, Roesch SC. Do exercise and self-management interventions benefit patients with osteoarthritis of the knee? A metaanalytic review. J Rheumatol 2006; 33: 744-756
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Durmus D, Alayli G, Canturk F. Effects of quadriceps electrical stimulation program on clinical parameters in the patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26: 674-678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Felson DT, Zhang Y. An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 1343-1355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gabyzon ME, Rozen N, Laufer Y. Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation enhance the effectiveness of an exercise programme in subjects with knee osteoarthritis? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2013; 27: 246-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Giombini A, Di Cesare A, Di Cesare M et al. Localized hyperthermia induced by microwave diathermy in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 980-987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gryzlo SM, Patek RM, Pink M et al. Electromyographic analysis of knee rehabilitation exercises. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 1994; 20: 36-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hartsell HD, Kramer JF. A comparison of the effects of electrode placement, muscle tension, and isometric torque of the knee extensors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992; 15: 168-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hurley MV. Muscle dysfunction and effective rehabilitation of knee osteoarthritis: what we know and what we need to find out. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 444-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16: 494-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Maffiuletti NA, Zory R, Miotti D et al. Neuromuscular adaptations to electrostimulation resistance training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85: 167-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Miller M, Downham D, Lexell J. Superimposed single impulse and pulse train electrical stimulation: a quantitative assessment during submaximal isometric knee extension in young, healthy men. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22: 1038-1046
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Monaghan B, Caulfield B, O’Mathuna DP. Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation for quadriceps strengthening pre and post total knee replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; Art. No.: CD007177 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007177.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 O’Reilly SC, Jones A, Muir KR et al. Quadriceps weakness in knee osteoarthritis: the effect on pain and disability. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 588-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Palmieri-Smith RM, Thomas AC, Karvonen-Gutierrez C et al. A clinical trial of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in improving quadriceps muscle strength and activation among women with mild and moderate osteoarthritis. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 1441-1452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pekindil Y, Sarikaya A, Birtane M et al. 99mTc-sestamibi muscle scintigraphy to assess the response to neuromuscular electrical stimulation of normal quadriceps femoris muscle. Ann Nucl Med 2001; 15: 397-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Puett DW, Griffin MR. Published trials of nonmedicinal and noninvasive therapies for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Annals of Internal Medicine 1994; 121: 133-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sheila C, O’Reilly Jones A, Muir KR. et al. Quadriceps weakness in knee osteoarthritis: the effect on pain and disability. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57: 588-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Bailey SL et al. Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1166-1173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Suetta C, Aagaard P, Magnusson SP et al. Muscle size, neuromuscular activation, and rapid force characteristics in elderly men and women: effects of unilateral long-term disuse due to hip-osteoarthritis. J Appl Physiol 2007; 102: 942-948
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Walls RJ, McHugh G, O’Gorman DJ et al. Effects of preoperative neuromuscular electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength and functional recovery in total knee arthroplasty. A pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 World Health Organization Bone and Joint Decade’s Musculoskeletal Portal. http://www.boneandjointdecade.org 2012 Accessed 10 Sept 2012
    PubMed
  • 25 Zhang Y, Jordan J. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 2010; 26: 355-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar