Abstract
This study evaluated the reliability and adaptive responses of cycling gross efficiency
(GE) performed at different intensities, across 3 trials in simulated hot (~30°C)
temperatures. Twelve cyclists performed 3 hot (30±0.7ºC and RH of 50±2.9%) GE sessions,
comprising 3 sub-maximal work rates of 150 W, 200 W and 250 W (5-min each), separated
by 24-h. Paired t-tests revealed no changes (P>0.05) in GE between trials. 95% limits of agreement demonstrated random error in
GE ranging from 1.71% (250 W; trials 1–2) to 2.32% (200 W; trials 1–2), leading to
a total error of -2.45%. The coefficient of variation (CV%) ranged from 3.1±0.4% (250 W;
trials 1–2) to 4.0±0.5% (200 W; trials 1–2). Among non-acclimated, well-trained cyclists,
GE did not change between consecutive submaximal cycling bouts performed in the heat.
The reliability of GE when cycling in the heat (CV=3.1–4.0%) is similar to that reported
among cyclists in thermoneutral environments. Whilst the interpretation of GE reliability
was dependent on the adopted statistical technique, it can be small enough to detect
typical changes owing to heat exposure.
Key words
thermoregulation - acclimation - temperature - oxygen consumption - cycling
