Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367005
Good vs. Poor Self-rated Diabetes Control: Differences in Cardiovascular Risk and Self-care Activities
Publication History
received 16 October 2013
first decision 20 December 2013
accepted 15 January 2014
Publication Date:
12 March 2014 (online)
Abstract
Aim:
The aim of this study was to assess differences in cardiovascular risk and performance of self-care activities in people who rated their diabetes control as good or poor.
Methods:
A sub-sample of 77 participants who took part in the Evaluation of Diabetes Treatment telephone interview were invited into a clinic to complete a series of laboratory examinations. Self-rated diabetes control was validated using the following laboratory markers: HbA1c, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio and LDL cholesterol. Differences in blood pressure and BMI were also assessed. Finally, all participants also completed the Summary of Self-Care activities questionnaire.
Results:
Those people who rated their diabetes control as fair or poor had a significantly higher BMI, HbA1c levels, total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio and systolic blood pressure. When asked about self-care activities in the past week, those people who reported their diabetes control was fair/poor had spent significantly fewer days following a general diet and exercising.
Conclusions:
People with poor self-rated diabetes control have unfavourable cardiovascular risk and decreased performance of self-care activities.
-
References
- 1 Canadian Diabetes Association Staying healthy with diabetes 2013 http://www.diabetes.ca/Files/StayHealthy.pdf
- 2 International Diabetes Federation Management of Diabetes 2013 http://www.idf.org/treatment-diabetes
- 3 Lange LJ, Piette JD. Perceived health status and perceived diabetes control: psychological indicators and accuracy. J Psychosom Res 2005; 58: 129-137
- 4 Lavoie ME, Faraj M, Strychar I et al. Synergistic associations of physical activity and diet quality on cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight and obese postmenopausal women. Br J Nutr 2012; May 9: 1-10
- 5 Smith KJ, Gariepy G, Pedneault M et al. Exploring the association of psychological status with self-rated diabetes control: results from the montreal evaluation of diabetes treatment study. Psychosomatics 2013; 54: 35-43
- 6 Smith KJ, Page V, Gariepy G et al. Self-rated diabetes control in a Canadian population with type 2 diabetes: associations with health behaviours and outcomes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012; 95: 162-168
- 7 Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD et al. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care 1993; 16: 434-444
- 8 Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 943-950