Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2014; 18(01): 003-011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365830
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Artifacts in Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography

Mihra S. Taljanovic
1   Department of Medical Imaging, the University of Arizona Health Network
,
David M. Melville
1   Department of Medical Imaging, the University of Arizona Health Network
,
Luke R. Scalcione
1   Department of Medical Imaging, the University of Arizona Health Network
,
Lana H. Gimber
1   Department of Medical Imaging, the University of Arizona Health Network
,
Eileen J. Lorenz
1   Department of Medical Imaging, the University of Arizona Health Network
,
Russell S. Witte
1   Department of Medical Imaging, the University of Arizona Health Network
2   Department of Biomedical Engineering, Optical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 February 2014 (online)

Abstract

During the past 2 decades, high-resolution ultrasonography (US) has been increasingly utilized in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal trauma and diseases with results comparable with MR imaging. US has an advantage over other cross-sectional modalities in many circumstances due to its superior spatial resolution and ability to allow dynamic assessment. When performing musculoskeletal US, the examiner has to be knowledgeable in the complex anatomy of the musculoskeletal system and US imaging technique. Additionally, he or she must be familiar with several common imaging artifacts in musculoskeletal US that may be mistaken for pathology, as well as several artifacts that frequently accompany pathologic conditions. These artifacts may occur with both B-mode gray-scale and Doppler imaging. In this article, we discuss common artifacts seen in musculoskeletal US and techniques to avoid or minimize these artifacts during clinical US examinations.

 
  • References

  • 1 Jacobson JA. Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012
  • 2 Jacobson JA. Musculoskeletal ultrasound: focused impact on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193 (3) 619-627
  • 3 Klauser AS, Peetrons P. Developments in musculoskeletal ultrasound and clinical applications. Skeletal Radiol 2009; ; September 3 (Epub ahead of print)
  • 4 Smith J, Finnoff JT. Diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound: part 1. Fundamentals. PM R 2009; 1 (1) 64-75
  • 5 Teh J. Applications of Doppler imaging in the musculoskeletal system. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2006; 35 (1) 22-34
  • 6 Hedrick WR, Hykes DL, Starchman DE. Doppler physics and instrumentation. In: Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation. 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2005
  • 7 Boesen MI, Boesen M, Langberg H , et al. Musculoskeletal colour/power Doppler in sports medicine: image parameters, artefacts, image interpretation and therapy. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2010; 28 (1) 103-113
  • 8 Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL, Bree RL, Adler RS. Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. Radiology 1994; 190 (3) 853-856
  • 9 Taljanovic MS, Goldberg MR, Sheppard JE, Rogers LF. US of the intrinsic and extrinsic wrist ligaments and triangular fibrocartilage complex—normal anatomy and imaging technique. Radiographics 2011; 31 (1) e44 DOI: 10.1148/rg.e44.
  • 10 Feldman MK, Katyal S, Blackwood MS. US artifacts. Radiographics 2009; 29 (4) 1179-1189
  • 11 Laing FC, Kurtz AB. The importance of ultrasonic side-lobe artifacts. Radiology 1982; 145 (3) 763-768
  • 12 Scanlan KA. Sonographic artifacts and their origins. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156 (6) 1267-1272
  • 13 Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011
  • 14 Rubin JM, Adler RS, Bude RO, Fowlkes JB, Carson PL. Clean and dirty shadowing at US: a reappraisal. Radiology 1991; 181 (1) 231-236
  • 15 Hartgerink P, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA, van Holsbeeck MT. Full- versus partial-thickness Achilles tendon tears: sonographic accuracy and characterization in 26 cases with surgical correlation. Radiology 2001; 220 (2) 406-412
  • 16 Reynolds Jr DL, Jacobson JA, Inampudi P, Jamadar DA, Ebrahim FS, Hayes CW. Sonographic characteristics of peripheral nerve sheath tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (3) 741-744
  • 17 Ziskin MC, Thickman DI, Goldenberg NJ, Lapayowker MS, Becker JM. The comet tail artifact. J Ultrasound Med 1982; 1 (1) 1-7
  • 18 Thickman DI, Ziskin MC, Goldenberg NJ, Linder BE. Clinical manifestations of the comet tail artifact. J Ultrasound Med 1983; 2 (5) 225-230
  • 19 Pozniak MA, Zagzebski JA, Scanlan KA. Spectral and color Doppler artifacts. Radiographics 1992; 12 (1) 35-44
  • 20 Rubin JM. Spectral Doppler US. Radiographics 1994; 14 (1) 139-150
  • 21 Nilsson A. Artefacts in sonography and Doppler. Eur Radiol 2001; 11 (8) 1308-1315
  • 22 Arning C. Mirror image artifacts of color Doppler images causing misinterpretation in carotid artery stenoses. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17 (11) 683-686
  • 23 Rahmouni A, Bargoin R, Herment A, Bargoin N, Vasile N. Color Doppler twinkling artifact in hyperechoic regions. Radiology 1996; 199 (1) 269-271
  • 24 Kamaya A, Tuthill T, Rubin JM. Twinkling artifact on color Doppler sonography: dependence on machine parameters and underlying cause. [published correction appears in AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:542]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180 (1) 215-222