Download PDF
Pneumologie 2014; 68(06): 371-377
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365318
Serie: Intensiv- und Beatmungsmedizin
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Welcher Beatmungszugang für welchen Patienten auf der Intensivstation?

Airway Devices in the Intensive Care Unit
M. Dreher
1   Sektion Pneumologie der Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen
,
S. Kluge
2   Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
› Author Affiliations
Subject Editor: W. Windisch, Köln
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 March 2014 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die derzeit auf der Intensivstation eingesetzten Beatmungszugänge. Bei der nichtinvasiven Beatmung liegt der Beatmungszugang definitionsgemäß außerhalb des Körpers, wodurch in der Regel keine Analgosedierung vonnöten ist. Hierdurch ist eine gewisse Kooperation vonseiten des Patienten nötig, welches eine sorgfältige Auswahl des Beatmungszuganges voraussetzt. Die Maskenintoleranz stellt das häufigste Problem für das Versagen der nichtinvasiven Beatmung dar. Der am häufigsten verwendete Beatmungszugang bei der nichtinvasiven Beatmung auf der Intensivstation ist die Nasen-Mundmaske. Diese erlaubt dem Patienten eine, bei der akuten respiratorischen Insuffizienz oft notwendige, Mundatmung. Gute Alternativen sind die Vollgesichtsmaske und der Beatmungshelm. Nasenmasken oder Mundstücke werden auf der Intensivstation hingegen nur selten eingesetzt. Die Koniotomie und supraglottische Atemwegshilfen kommen als Notfallmaßnahme beim schwierigen Atemweg auf der Intensivstation zum Einsatz. Der Goldstandard zur Sicherung der Atemwege ist jedoch nach wie vor die endotracheale Intubation, welche mit einer Reihe von potentiellen Komplikationen assoziiert ist. Die Tracheotomie ist der Standardzugang, wenn eine Langzeitbeatmung beim Intensivpatienten absehbar wird.

Abstract

This review presents the potential indications for different airway devices in the intensive care unit (ICU). Since the interface during noninvasive ventilation is located outside the body, sedation is not regularly needed. Therefore, selection of a fitting mask is essential to avoid mask intolerance which is one of the biggest problems during noninvasive ventilation. Full-face masks are the interfaces mostly used for noninvasive ventilation to treat acute respiratory failure; here, mouth breathing is possible which is often necessary during acute respiratory failure. Good alternatives are total face masks and the helmet, whereas nasal masks and mouthpieces are not regularly used on the ICU. Extraglottic airway devices and coniotomy are used for the management of difficult airway situations on the ICU. Endotracheal intubation remains the gold standard procedure for airway management. However, this procedure is associated with a number of complications. Tracheostomy is the airway access of choice when long-term mechanical ventilation is necessary.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Zilberberg MD, de Wit M, Shorr AF. Accuracy of previous estimates for adult prolonged acute mechanical ventilation volume in 2020: update using 2000 – 2008 data. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 18-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Evans TW. International Consensus Conferences in Intensive Care Medicine: non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Organised jointly by the American Thoracic Society, the European Respiratory Society, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, and approved by the ATS Board of Directors, December 2000. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27: 166-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nava S, Navalesi P, Gregoretti C. Interfaces and humidification for noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Respir Care 2009; 54: 71-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Elliott MW. The interface: crucial for successful noninvasive ventilation. Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 7-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kwok H, McCormack J, Cece R et al. Controlled trial of oronasal versus nasal mask ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 468-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Antón A, Tárrega J, Giner J et al. Acute physiologic effects of nasal and full-face masks during noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Care 2003; 48: 922-925
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dellweg D, Hochrainer D, Klauke M et al. Determinants of skin contact pressure formation during non-invasive ventilation. J Biomech 2010; 43: 652-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lemyze M, Mallat J, Nigeon O et al. Rescue therapy by switching to total face mask after failure of face mask-delivered noninvasive ventilation in do-not-intubate patients in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 481-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Antonelli M, Conti G, Pelosi P et al. New treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: noninvasive pressure support ventilation delivered by helmet--a pilot controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 602-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cosentini R, Brambilla AM, Aliberti S et al. Helmet continuous positive airway pressure vs oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, controlled trial. Chest 2010; 138: 114-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Olivieri C, Costa R, Spinazzola G et al. Bench comparative evaluation of a new generation and standard helmet for delivering non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 734-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Antonelli M, Pennisi MA, Pelosi P et al. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation using a helmet in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a feasibility study. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 16-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Moerer O, Beck J, Brander L et al. Subject-ventilator synchrony during neural versus pneumatically triggered non-invasive helmet ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1615-1623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Madden BP, Kariyawasam H, Siddiqi AJ et al. Noninvasive ventilation in cystic fibrosis patients with acute or chronic respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2002; 19: 310-313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pothmann W, Kluge S. Endotracheal intubation. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2010; 135: 94-97
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schönhofer B, Kuhlen R, Neumann P et al. Non-invasive ventilation as treatment for acute respiratory insufficiency. Essentials from the new S3 guidelines. Anaesthesist 2008; 57: 1091-1102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Deutschman CS, Wilton P, Sinow J et al. Paranasal sinusitis associated with nasotracheal intubation: a frequently unrecognized and treatable source of sepsis. Crit Care Med 1986; 14: 111-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lacherade J-C, De Jonghe B, Guezennec P et al. Intermittent subglottic secretion drainage and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 182: 910-917
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pirlich N, Piepho T, Gervais H et al. Indirect laryngoscopy/video laryngoscopy. A review of devices used in emergency and intensive care medicine in Germany. Med Klin Intensiv Notfallmedizin 2012; 107: 521-530
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cook T, Behringer EC, Benger J. Airway management outside the operating room: hazardous and incompletely studied. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25: 461-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jaber S, Jung B, Corne P et al. An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 248-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wang F, Wu Y, Bo L et al. The timing of tracheotomy in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest 2011; 140: 1456-1465
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Higgins KM, Punthakee X. Meta-analysis comparison of open versus percutaneous tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 447-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Braune S, Kluge S. Update on tracheotomy. Med Klin Intensiv Notfallmedizin 2012; 107: 543-547
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Freeman BD, Morris PE. Tracheostomy practice in adults with acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2012; 40: 2890-2896
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Windisch W, Walterspacher S, Siemon K et al. Guidelines for non-invasive and invasive mechanical ventilation for treatment of chronic respiratory failure. Published by the German Society for Pneumology (DGP). Pneumol Stuttg Ger 2010; 64: 640-652
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Braune S, Kluge S. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2011; 136: 1265-1269
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kluge S, Baumann HJ, Maier C et al. Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a nationwide survey. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1639-1643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Baumann HJ, Kemei C, Kluge S. Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Pneumol 2010; 64: 769-776
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Timmermann A, Byhahn C, Wenzel V et al. Handlungsempfehlung für das präklinische Atemwegsmanagement. Anästh Intensiv 2012; 53: 294-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Schwarzkopf K. Supraglottic airway devices. Med Klin Intensiv Notfallmedizin 2012; 107: 531-536
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pratt T, Bromilow J. Laryngeal mask airway for airway control during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 1009-1013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Guttmann J, Eberhard L, Fabry B et al. Continuous calculation of intratracheal pressure in tracheally intubated patients. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 503-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Windisch W, Buchholt A, Stahl CA et al. Flow-dependent resistance of nasal masks used for non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. Respirol Carlton Vic 2006; 11: 471-476
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Schönhofer B. Nichtinvasive Beatmung – gestern, heute und morgen. Intensivmed 2008; 45: 182-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar