Download PDF
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2014; 46(01): 47-48
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363664
Commentary
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Commentary on “Does Ultrasonography Contribute Significantly to the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?” by A. Zyluk, I. Walaszek and Z. Szlosser

Kommentar auf „Leistet Ultraschall einen signifikanten Beitrag zur Diagnose des Karpaltunnelsyndroms?“ von A. Zyluk, I. Walaszek and Z. Szlosser
L. P. Kamolz
1   Klinische Abteilung für Plastische, Ästhetische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Medizinische Universität Graz
,
H. B. Kitzinger
2   Klinische Abteilung für Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Medizinische Universität Wien
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 27 October 2013

accepted 19 November 2013

Publication Date:
26 February 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis can be made based on the history and clinical findings in most of the cases, but in doubtful cases, electrophysiological tests and ultrasound can provide additonal and useful information.

Zusammenfassung

Auch wenn Anamnese und der klinische Untersuchungsbefund für ein Karpaltunnelsyndrom charakteristisch sind, und die Diagnose zumeist aufgrund dieser charakteristischen Symptome erfolgt, so kann in einigen Fällen die Messung der Nervenleitgeschwindigkeit und der Ultraschall sinnvolle Informationen Iiefern.

Key words

N. medianus - carpal tunnel syndrome - decompression

Schlüsselwörter

N. medianus - Karpaltunnelsyndrom - Nervendekompression
 

  • References

  • 1 Zyluk A, Walaszek I, Szlosser Z. Does ultrasonography contribute significantly tot he diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2014; in press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kamolz LP, Beck H, Haslik W et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a question of hand and wrist configurations?. J Hand Surg Br 2004; 29: 321-324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kamolz LP, Schrogendorfer KF, Rab M et al. The precision of ultrasound imaging and its relevance for carpal tunnel syndrome. Surg Rad Anat 2001; 23: 117-121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Buchberger W, Schon G, Strasser K et al. High-resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. J Ulrasound Med 1991; 10: 531-537
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tai TW, Wu CY, Su FC et al. Ultrasonography for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012; 38: 1121-1128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Won SJ, Kim BJ, Park KS et al. Reference values for nerve ultrasonography in the upper extremity. Muscle Nerve 2013; 47: 864-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fowler JR, Gaughan JP, Ilyaas AM. The sensitivity and specifity of ultrasound fort he diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 1089-1094
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tagliafico A, Pugliese F, Bianchi S et al. High-resolution sonography of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 107-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gassner EM, Schocke M, Peer S et al. Persistent median artery in the carpal tunnel: color Doppler ultrasonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 455-461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Park HY, Kim JS, Kim E et al. Median nerve location change evaluated by ultrasound according to symptom severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1434-1435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 JDP Bland, Rudolfer SM. Ultrasound imaging oft he median nerve as a prognostic factor for carpal tunnel decompression. Muscle Nerve 2013; in press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar