Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63(04): 282-287
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363495
Original Cardiovascular
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Assessment of Radial Artery Graft Patency in Symptomatic Patients

Ertekin U. Unal
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Ferit Cicekcioglu
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Anil Ozen
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Metin Yilmaz
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Emre Kubat
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Hakki Z. Iscan
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
,
Cemal L. Birincioglu
1   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 September 2013

29 October 2013

Publication Date:
13 January 2014 (online)

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patency of radial artery (RA) grafts consistent with the target vessel characteristics.

Methods Between October 2001 and January 2012, 83 symptomatic patients or patients with positive ischemic test results underwent coronary angiography following coronary artery bypass grafting. Of these, 68 patients with 81 RA grafts at a mean 49.2 ± 31.9 months (range, 1–137 months) were evaluated. According to the location and degree of proximal stenosis, 5-year graft patency was determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis. The relationships between RA graft patency and degree of proximal stenosis, target vessel location, and inflow characteristics of grafts were assessed by means of Cox proportional hazard models.

Results Mean age of the patients was 56.4 ± 10.2 years. The period between the operation and postoperative coronary angiography was 49.2 ± 31.9 months (range, 1–137 months; median, 48.8 months). There was no impact on RA patency with regard to preoperative characteristics of the patients. RA patency was higher for left coronary system compared with right system (p = 0.038; 85.5 vs. 65.4%). In addition, patency rate was statistically higher for the proximal stenosis ≥ 90% (odds ratio, 3.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–11.07; p = 0.018). Kaplan–Meier patency analysis showed a patency of RA as 79.2% at 5 years.

Conclusion RA graft patency differs with degree of preoperative native coronary artery stenosis and location of target vessel. RA grafts to not severely stenosed (< 90%) coronary system and to the right coronary territory carry a remarkably high risk of graft failure.

 
  • References

  • 1 Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (1) 93-101
  • 2 Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM , et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314 (1) 1-6
  • 3 Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghese M , et al. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54 (4) 652-659 , discussion 659–660
  • 4 Acar C, Ramsheyi A, Pagny JY , et al. The radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: clinical and angiographic results at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116 (6) 981-989
  • 5 Khot UN, Friedman DT, Pettersson G, Smedira NG, Li J, Ellis SG. Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts. Circulation 2004; 109 (17) 2086-2091
  • 6 Possati G, Gaudino M, Prati F , et al. Long-term results of the radial artery used for myocardial revascularization. Circulation 2003; 108 (11) 1350-1354
  • 7 Goldman S, Sethi GK, Holman W , et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2011; 305 (2) 167-174
  • 8 Hayward PA, Gordon IR, Hare DL , et al. Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139 (1) 60-65 , discussion 65–67
  • 9 Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE ; Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (22) 2302-2309
  • 10 Huddleston CB, Stoney WS, Alford Jr WC , et al. Internal mammary artery grafts: technical factors influencing patency. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 42 (5) 543-549
  • 11 Paz MA, Lupon J, Bosch X, Pomar JL, Sanz G ; The GESIC Study Group. Predictors of early saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass graft occlusion. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56 (5) 1101-1106
  • 12 Glineur D, D'hoore W, de Kerchove L , et al. Angiographic predictors of 3-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the right coronary artery system: a prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and right internal thoracic artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142 (5) 980-988
  • 13 Buxton BF, Ruengsakulrach P, Fuller J, Rosalion A, Reid CM, Tatoulis J. The right internal thoracic artery graft—benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18 (3) 255-261
  • 14 Royse AG, Royse CF, Tatoulis J , et al. Postoperative radial artery angiography for coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 17 (3) 294-304
  • 15 Maniar HS, Sundt TM, Barner HB , et al. Effect of target stenosis and location on radial artery graft patency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123 (1) 45-52
  • 16 Glineur D, Hanet C. Competitive flow in coronary bypass surgery: is it a problem?. Curr Opin Cardiol 2012; 27 (6) 620-628
  • 17 Shah PJ, Durairaj M, Gordon I , et al. Factors affecting patency of internal thoracic artery graft: clinical and angiographic study in 1434 symptomatic patients operated between 1982 and 2002. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26 (1) 118-124
  • 18 Moran SV, Baeza R, Guarda E , et al. Predictors of radial artery patency for coronary bypass operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (5) 1552-1556
  • 19 Tatoulis J, Royse AG, Buxton BF , et al. The radial artery in coronary surgery: a 5-year experience—clinical and angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73 (1) 143-147 , discussion 147–148
  • 20 Possati G, Gaudino M, Alessandrini F , et al. Midterm clinical and angiographic results of radial artery grafts used for myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116 (6) 1015-1021
  • 21 Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA , et al. Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88 (1) 23-29 , discussion 29–30
  • 22 Zacharias A, Schwann TA, Riordan CJ, Durham SJ, Shah AS, Habib RH. Late results of conventional versus all-arterial revascularization based on internal thoracic and radial artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87 (1) 19-26 , e2
  • 23 Achouh P, Isselmou KO, Boutekadjirt R , et al. Reappraisal of a 20-year experience with the radial artery as a conduit for coronary bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41 (1) 87-92
  • 24 Iacò AL, Teodori G, Di Giammarco G , et al. Radial artery for myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical and angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (2) 464-468 , discussion 468–469
  • 25 Watson RA, Hamza M, Tsakok TM, Tsakok MT. Radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: does proximal anastomosis to the aorta or left internal mammary artery achieve better patency?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 17 (6) 1020-1024