Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(09): 779-784
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363236
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Effects of Running Cadence Manipulation on Plantar Loading in Healthy Runners

J. Wellenkotter
1   Health Professions, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, United States
T. W. Kernozek
1   Health Professions, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, United States
S. Meardon
2   Department of Physical Therapy, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
T. Suchomel
3   Exercise and Sport Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision 07 November 2013

Publication Date:
04 March 2014 (online)


Our purpose was to evaluate effects of cadence manipulation on plantar loading during running. Participants (n=38) ran on a treadmill at their preferred speed in 3 conditions: preferred, 5% increased, and 5% decreased while measured using in-shoe sensors. Data (contact time [CT], peak force [PF], force time integral [FTI], pressure time integral [PTI] and peak pressure [PP]) were recorded for 30 right footfalls. Multivariate analysis was performed to detect differences in loading between cadences in the total foot and 4 plantar regions. Differences in plantar loading occurred between cadence conditions. Total foot CT and PF were lower with a faster cadence, but no total foot PP differences were observed. Faster cadence reduced CT, pressure and force variables in both the heel and metatarsal regions. Increasing cadence did not elevate metatarsal loads; rather, total foot and all regions were reduced when healthy runners increased their cadence. If a 5% increase in cadence from preferred were maintained over each mile run the impulse at the heel would be reduced by an estimated 565 body weights*s (BW*s) and the metatarsals 140–170 BW*s per mile run despite the increased steps taken. Increasing cadence may benefit overuse injuries associated with elevated plantar loading.

  • References

  • 1 Baur H, Divert C, Hirschmüller A, Müller S, Belli A, Mayer F. Analysis of gait differences in healthy runners and runners with chronic Achilles tendon complaints. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2004; 12: 111-116
  • 2 Bennell K, Matheson G, Meeuwisse W, Brukner P. Risk factors for stress fractures. Sports Med Auckl NZ 1999; 28: 91-122
  • 3 Burns J, Crosbie J, Hunt A, Ouvrier R. The effect of pes cavus on foot pain and plantar pressure. Clin Biomech 2005; 20: 877-882
  • 4 Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA. Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech 1980; 13: 397-406
  • 5 Chumanov ES, Wille CM, Michalski MP, Heiderscheit BC. Changes in muscle activation patterns when running step rate is increased. Gait Posture 2012; 36: 231-235
  • 6 Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155-159
  • 7 Dallam GM, Wilber RL, Jadelis K, Fletcher G, Romanov N. Effect of a global alteration of running technique on kinematics and economy. J Sports Sci 2005; 23: 757-764
  • 8 Donahue SW, Sharkey NA. Strains in the metatarsals during the stance phase of gait: implications for stress fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1236-1244
  • 9 Edwards WB, Taylor D, Rudolphi TJ, Gillette JC, Derrick TR. Effects of running speed on a probabilistic stress fracture model. Clin Biomech 2010; 25: 372-377
  • 10 Finnoff JT, Hall MM, Kyle K, Krause DA, Lai J, Smith J. Hip strength and knee pain in high school runners: a prospective study. PM R 2011; 3: 792-801
  • 11 Van Gent RN, Siem D, van Middelkoop M, van Os AG, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Koes BW. Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2007; 41: 469-480 discussion 480
  • 12 Van Ginckel A, Thijs Y, Heasr NG, Mahieu N, De Clercq D, Roosen P, Witvrouw E. . Gait Posture. 2009 Apr 29: 387-391
  • 13 Gross TS, Bunch RP. A mechanical model of metatarsal stress fracture during distance running. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17: 669-674
  • 14 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
  • 15 Heiderscheit BC, Chumanov ES, Michalski MP, Wille CM, Ryan MB. Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 296-302
  • 16 Hobara H, Sato T, Sakaguchi M, Sato T, Nakazawa K. Step frequency and lower extremity loading during running. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 310-313
  • 17 Hreljac A, Marshall RN, Hume PA. Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1635-1641
  • 18 James SL, Bates BT, Osternig LR. Injuries to runners. Am J Sports Med 1978; 6: 40-50
  • 19 Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 585-593
  • 20 Kernozek TW, LaMott EE, Dancisak MJ. Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking. Foot Ankle Int 1996; 17: 204-209
  • 21 Kernozek TW, Zimmer KA. Reliability and running speed effects of in-shoe loading measurements during slow treadmill running. Foot Ankle Int 2000; 21: 749-752
  • 22 Mathews SC, Narotsky DL, Bernholt DL, Vogt M, Hsieh YH, Pronovost PJ, Pham JC. . Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul 40: 1495-1500
  • 23 Morgan D, Martin P, Craib M, Caruso C, Clifton R, Hopewell R. Effect of step length optimization on the aerobic demand of running. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77: 245-251
  • 24 Munteanu SE, Barton CJ. Lower limb biomechanics during running in individuals with Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res 2011; 4: 15
  • 25 Murphy DF, Connolly DJ, Beynnon BD. Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 13-29
  • 26 Nagel A, Fernholz F, Kibele C, Rosenbaum D. Long-distance running increases plantar pressures beneath the metatarsal heads: a barefoot walking investigation of 200 marathon runners. Gait Posture 2008; 27: 152-155
  • 27 Nigg BM, De Boer RW, Fisher V. A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 98-105
  • 28 Noehren B, Davis I, Hamill J. ASB clinical biomechanics award winner 2006 prospective study of the biomechanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome. Clin Biomech 2007; 22: 951-956
  • 29 Pohl MB, Hamill J, Davis IS. Biomechanical and anatomic factors associated with a history of plantar fasciitis in female runners. Clin J Sport Med 2009; 19: 372-376
  • 30 Queen RM, Abbey AN, Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA. Plantar loading comparisons between women with a history of second metatarsal stress fractures and normal controls. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 390-395
  • 31 Riley PO, Dicharry J, Franz J, Della Croce U, Wilder RP, Kerrigan DC. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 1093-1100
  • 32 Riley PO, Paolini G, Della Croce U, Paylo KW, Kerrigan DC. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 2007; 26: 17-24
  • 33 Satterthwaite P, Larmer P, Gardiner J, Norton R. Incidence of injuries and other health problems in the Auckland Citibank marathon, 1993. Br J Sports Med 1996; 30: 324-326
  • 34 Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 95-101
  • 35 Thijs Y, De Clercq D, Roosen P, Witvrouw E. Gait-related intrinsic risk factors for patellofemoral pain in novice recreational runners. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 466-471
  • 36 Weber JM, Vidt LG, Gehl RS, Montgomery T. Calcaneal stress fractures. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2005; 22: 45-54
  • 37 Willems TM, De Clercq D, Delbaere K, Vanderstraeten G, De Cock A, Witvrouw E. A prospective study of gait related risk factors for exercise-related lower leg pain. Gait Posture 2006; 23: 91-98
  • 38 Zadpoor AA, Nikooyan AA. The relationship between lower-extremity stress fractures and the ground reaction force: a systematic review. Clin Biomech 2011; 26: 23-28