Semin Speech Lang 2014; 35(01): 051-064
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1362991
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

iPractice: Piloting the Effectiveness of a Tablet-Based Home Practice Program in Aphasia Treatment

Jacquie Kurland
1   Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts
,
Abigail R. Wilkins
1   Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts
,
Polly Stokes
1   Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 January 2014 (online)

Abstract

The current study investigated the effectiveness of a home practice program based on the iPad (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA), implemented after 2 weeks of intensive language therapy, for maintaining and augmenting treatment gains in people with chronic poststroke aphasia. Five of eight original participants completed the 6-month home practice program in which they autonomously practiced retrieving words for objects and actions. Half of these words had been trained and half were untrained during therapy. Practice included tasks such as naming to confrontation, repeating from a video model, and picture/word matching presented on an iPad. All participants maintained advances made on words trained during the intensive treatment and additionally were able to learn new words by practicing daily over a 6-month period. The iPad and other tablet devices have great potential for personalized home practice to maintain and augment traditional aphasia rehabilitation. It appears that motivation to use the technology and adequate training are more important factors than age, aphasia type or severity, or prior experience with computers.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hirsch Atticks A. Therapy session 2.0: from static to dynamic with the iPad. ASHA Perspectives on Gerontology 2012; 17: 84-93
  • 2 Holland AL, Weinberg P, Dittelman J. How to use apps clinically in the treatment of aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2012; 33 (3) 223-233
  • 3 Kiran S, Des Roches C, Balachandran I, Ascenso E. Validation of an iPad based therapy for language and cognitive rehabilitation in individuals with brain damage. Poster presented at: Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 2013; Tucson, AZ
  • 4 Brandenburg C, Worrall L, Rodriguez AD, Copland D. Mobile computing technology and aphasia: an integrated review of accessibility and potential uses. Aphasiology 2013; 27: 444-461
  • 5 Fink RB, Brecher A, Schwartz MF. A computer-implemented protocol for treatment of naming disorders: evaluation of a clinician-guided and partially self-guided instruction. Aphasiology 2002; 16: 1061-1086
  • 6 Ramsberger G, Marie B. Self-administered cued naming therapy: a single-participant investigation of a computer-based therapy program replicated in four cases. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2007; 16 (4) 343-358
  • 7 Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Improvement of oral naming by unsupervised computerized rehabilitation. Aphasiology 2001; 15 (2) 151-169
  • 8 Palmer R, Enderby P, Cooper CC , et al. Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long-standing aphasia poststroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2012; 43 (7) 1904-1911
  • 9 Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn 1980; 6 (2) 174-215
  • 10 Masterson J, Druks J. Description of a set of 164 nouns and 102 verbs matched for printed word frequency, familiarity and age-of-acquisition. J Neurol 1998; 11: 331-354
  • 11 Pulvermüller F, Neininger B, Elbert T , et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32 (7) 1621-1626
  • 12 Pulvermüller F, Berthier ML. Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis. Aphasiology 2008; 22 (6) 563-599
  • 13 Davis GA, Wilcox MJ. Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation: Applied Pragmatics. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press; 1985
  • 14 Carlomagno S. Pragmatic Approaches to Aphasia Therapy. London, UK: Whurr Publishers; 1994
  • 15 Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2001
  • 16 Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2001
  • 17 Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (1) S225-S239
  • 18 Singh S. Designing intelligent interfaces for users with memory and language limitations. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 157-177
  • 19 Basso A, Caporali A. Aphasia therapy or the importance of being earnest. Aphasiology 2001; 15 (4) 307-332
  • 20 Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 2003; 34 (4) 987-993
  • 21 Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (5) 1282-1299
  • 22 Elman RE. The Internet and aphasia: crossing the digital divide. Aphasiology 2001; 15: 895-899
  • 23 Beeson PM, Robey RR. Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychological Review 2006; 16: 161-169
  • 24 Robey R, Beeson PM. Aphasia treatment: Examining the evidence. Presentation at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention. San Diego, CA; 2005