Challenges in Measuring Outcomes Following Digital Replantation

Abstract

In the early period of replantation surgery, the emphasis was on digit survival. Subsequently, with better microsurgical techniques and instrumentation, the focus has shifted to function and in recent years to consideration of cost-effectiveness. Despite over 40 years of effort in refining digital replantation surgery, a rigorous evaluation of the outcomes of digital replantation has not been performed. This is because of the many confounding variables that influence outcome comparisons. These variables include the mechanism of injury (guillotine, crush, avulsion), the injury itself (total, near total, subtotal, partial amputation), and the surgical procedure (replantation, revascularization). In addition, the traditional outcome measures (two-point discrimination, range of motion, grip strength, or the ability to return to work) are reported inconsistently and vary widely among publications. All these factors make meaningful comparison of outcomes difficult. The recent emphasis on outcome research and cost-effectiveness necessitates a rethinking in the way we report outcomes of digital replantation. In this article, the authors summarize the challenges in assessing outcomes of digital replantation and explain the need to measure outcomes using rigorous clinical research designs that incorporate cost-effectiveness studies in the research protocol.

Keywords

digital replantation - outcome of replantation - research design - health-related quality of life instruments - cost effectiveness

• References

• 1 Zhong-Wei C, Meyer VE, Kleinert HE, Beasley RW. Present indications and contraindications for replantation as reflected by long-term functional results. Orthop Clin North Am 1981; 12 (4) 849-870
• 2 Thoma A, Jansen L, Sprague S. Outcomes in microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (6, Suppl): e303-e312
• 3 Alderman AK, Chung KC. Measuring outcomes in hand surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (2) 239-250
• 4 Glas K, Biemer E, Duspiva KP, Werber K, Stock W, Herndl E. Long-term follow-up results of 97 finger replantations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1982; 100 (2) 95-98
• 5 Lebedev LV, Bogomolov MS, Vavylov VN , et al. Long-term follow-up of hand function after digit replantation. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 31 (4) 322-326
• 6 Bora A, Ada S, Ozerkan F, Tetik F. Replantations and their functional results: the Turkish experience. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (2) 97-101
• 7 Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Un-nanuntana A. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury 2000; 31 (1) 33-40
• 8 Biemer E. Definitions and classifications in replantation surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1980; 33 (2) 164-168
• 9 Patradul A, Ngarmukos C, Parkpian V. Distal digital replantations and revascularizations. 237 digits in 192 patients. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998; 23 (5) 578-582
• 10 Hahn HO, Jung SG. Results of replantation of amputated fingertips in 450 patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2006; 22 (6) 407-413
• 11 Scott FA, Howar JW, Boswick Jr JA. Recovery of function following replantation and revascularization of amputated hand parts. J Trauma 1981; 21 (3) 204-214
• 12 Kleinert HE, Jablon M, Tsai TM. An overview of replantation and results of 347 replants in 245 patients. J Trauma 1980; 20 (5) 390-398
• 13 Ikeda K, Morikawa S, Hashimoto F, Tomita K. Fingertip replantation: pre-osteosynthesis vein graft technique. Microsurgery 1994; 15 (6) 430-432
• 14 Suzuki K, Matsuda M. Digital replantations distal to the distal interphalangeal joint. J Reconstr Microsurg 1987; 3 (4) 291-295
• 15 Narushima M, Mihara M, Koshima I , et al. Intravascular stenting (IVaS) method for fingertip replantation. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (1) 38-41
• 16 Ozçelik IB, Purisa H, Mersa B , et al. Başparmak distal uç amputasyonlarında replantasyon uygulamalarının geç dönem sonuçları [Late results of replantations in tip amputations of the thumb]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008; 42 (4) 252-257
• 17 Foucher G, Henderson HR, Maneau M, Merle M, Braun FM. Distal digital replantation: One of the best indications for microsurgery. Int J Microsurg 1981; 3: 263-270
• 18 Buntic RF, Brooks D, Buncke GM. Index finger salvage with replantation and revascularization: revisiting conventional wisdom. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (8) 612-616
• 19 Yamano Y. Replantation of fingertips. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (2) 157-162
• 20 Tamai S. Twenty years' experience of limb replantation—review of 293 upper extremity replants. J Hand Surg 1982; 7: 549-556
• 21 Bindra RR, Dias JJ, Heras-Palau C, Amadio PC, Chung KC, Burke FD. Assessing outcome after hand surgery: the current state. J Hand Surg [Br] 2003; 28 (4) 289-294
• 22 Malizos KN, Beris AE, Kabani CT, Korobilias AB, Mavrodontidis AN, Soucacos PN. Distal phalanx microsurgical replantation. Microsurgery 1994; 15 (7) 464-468
• 23 Kim WK, Lim JH, Han SK. Fingertip replantations: clinical evaluation of 135 digits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (3) 470-476
• 24 Han SK, Lee BI, Kim WK. Topical and systemic anticoagulation in the treatment of absent or compromised venous outflow in replanted fingertips. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (4) 659-667
• 25 Ozcelik IB, Tuncer S, Purisa H , et al. Sensory outcome of fingertip replantations without nerve repair. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (7) 524-530
• 26 Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118 (8) 622-629
• 27 Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30 (6) 473-483
• 28 Langenhoff BS, Krabbe PF, Wobbes T, Ruers TJ. Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. Br J Surg 2001; 88 (5) 643-652
• 29 Wood-Dauphinee S. Assessing quality of life in clinical research: from where have we come and where are we going?. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52 (4) 355-363
• 30 Boku T, Yokoyama K, Nakamura K , et al. Functional outcome and quality of life of Gustilo IIIB open tibial fractures requiring free tissue transfers: a report of eight cases. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (7) 532-537
• 31 Nanda U, Andresen EM. Health-related quality of life. A guide for the health professional. Eval Health Prof 1998; 21 (2) 179-215
• 32 EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16 (3) 199-208
• 33 Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23 (4) 575-587
• 34 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C ; The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (6) 602-608
• 35 Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, Katz JN, Vickers-Lahti M. Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale. J Occup Environ Med 1997; 39 (12) 1195-1202
• 36 Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU , et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994; 3 (6) 347-352
• 37 Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 1991; 4 (4) 143-149
• 38 Dias JJ, Bhowal B, Wildin CJ, Thompson JR. Assessing the outcome of disorders of the hand. Is the patient evaluation measure reliable, valid, responsive and without bias?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (2) 235-240
• 39 MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12 (8) 577-586
• 40 Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B , et al. Clinimetric properties of the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index: an evaluation of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10 (11) 863-869
• 41 Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ , et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (11) 1585-1592
• 42 Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC ; Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. JAMA 1996; 276 (14) 1172-1177
• 43 Pizzi L, Lofland JH, Elwood C , Eds. Economic evaluation in U.S. health care: principles and applications. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2005: 2-9
• 44 Alderman AK, Storey AF, Chung KC. Financial impact of emergency hand trauma on the health care system. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206 (2) 233-238
• 45 Chung KC, Kowalski CP, Walters MR. Finger replantation in the United States: rates and resource use from the 1996 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (6) 1038-1042
• 46 Burt CW, McCaig LF. Staffing, capacity, and ambulance diversion in emergency departments: United States, 2003-04. Adv Data 2006; 376 (376) 1-23
• 47 Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Fundamental principles of conducting a surgery economic analysis study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (2) 727-735
• 48 Muennig P. Designing and conducting cost-effectiveness analyses in medicine and health care. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002
• 49 Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1997
• 50 Thoma A, Sprague S, Tandan V ; Evidence-Based Surgery Working Group. Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to use an article on economic analysis. Can J Surg 2001; 44 (5) 347-354
• 51 McGregor M. Cost-utility analysis: use QALYs only with great caution. CMAJ 2003; 168 (4) 433-434
• 52 Thoma A, Strumas N, Rockwell G, McKnight L. The use of cost-effectiveness analysis in plastic surgery clinical research. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (2) 285-296
• 53 Sprague S, McKay P, Thoma A. Study design and the hierarchy of evidence for surgical decision making. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35: 195-205
• 54 Hasuo T, Nishi G, Tsuchiya D, Otsuka T. Fingertip replantations: importance of venous anastomosis and the clinical results. Hand Surg 2009; 14 (1) 1-6
• 55 Chung KC, Burns PB, Davis Sears E. Outcomes research in hand surgery: where have we been and where should we go?. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (8) 1373-1379