Zusammenfassung
Ziel der Studie war es, Stationsklima, Sicherheit, therapeutischen Halt und Patientenzusammenhalt
auf geschlossenen, neu geöffneten und offenen Stationen zu vergleichen.
Methodik: Untersuchung der Zielparameter mittels Essen Climate Evaluation Schema.
Ergebnisse: Das globale Stationsklima (p < 0,001), die Sicherheit (p < 0,001) und der Patientenzusammenhalt (p < 0,001) auf den neu geöffneten Stationen wurden als signifikant besser bewertet
als auf den anderen Stationen.
Schlussfolgerung: Die Öffnung von Stationen ist geeignet, zur Etablierung eines therapiefördernden
Behandlungsklimas beizutragen.
Abstract
Objective: To compare ward atmosphere, safety, therapeutic hold, and patients’ coherence on closed,
recently opened, and open psychiatric wards.
Methods: Ward atmosphere on two closed, two recently opened, and two permanently open wards
was examined using the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES), and structural
as well as clinical data were extracted.
Results: Global ward atmosphere (p < 0.001), safety (p < 0.001), and patients’ coherence (p < 0.001) on the recently opened wards were significantly higher than on the closed
and permanently open wards. No significant differences were found regarding therapeutic
hold. Recently opened wards had the highest occupancy, and there were no significant
differences regarding severity of illness.
Conclusion: Opening closed psychiatric wards can help establish a positive therapeutic atmosphere
without omitting more severely ill patients or endangering patients and therapists.
Schlüsselwörter
Akutpsychiatrie - Behandlungsklima - geschlossene Stationsführung - Stationsatmosphäre
- Türöffnung
Keywords
acute psychiatry - closed ward - open doors policy - therapeutic climate - ward atmosphere