Refining the Indications for the Addition of Orbital Osteotomy during Anterior Cranial Base Approaches: Morphometric and Radiologic Study of the Anterior Cranial Base Osteology

Abstract

Objectives In anatomic and radiologic morphometric studies, we examine a predictive method, based on preoperative imaging of the anterior cranial base, to define when addition of orbital osteotomy is warranted.

Design Anatomic and radiographic study.

Setting In 100 dry skulls, measurements in the anterior cranial fossa included three lines and two angles based on computerized tomography (CT) scans taken in situ and validated using frameless stereotactic navigation. The medial angle (coronal plane) was the intersection between the highest point of both orbits and the midpoint between the two frontoethmoidal sutures to each orbital roof high point. The oblique angle (sagittal plane) was the intersection at the midpoint of the limbus sphenoidale.

Results No identifiable morphometric patterns were found for our classification of anterior fossae; the two-tailed distribution pattern was similar for all skulls, disproving the hypothetical correlation between visual appearance and morphometry. Orbital heights (range: 6.6–18.7 mm) showed a linear relationship with medial and oblique angles, and they had a linear distribution relative to angular increments. Orbital heights > 11 mm were associated with angles ≥ 20 degrees and more likely to benefit from orbitotomy.

Conclusion Preoperative CT measurement of orbital height appears feasible for predicting when orbitotomy is needed, and it warrants further testing.

Keywords

orbitotomy - skull base - frameless stereotaxy - anterior cranial base

• References

• 1 Acharya R, Shaya M, Kumar R, Caldito GC, Nanda A. Quantification of the advantages of the extended frontal approach to skull base. Skull Base 2004; 14 (3) 133-142 ; discussion 141–142
• 2 Alaywan M, Sindou M. Fronto-temporal approach with orbito-zygomatic removal. Surgical anatomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990; 104 (3–4) 79-83
• 3 Andaluz N, Romano A, Reddy LV, Zuccarello M. Eyelid approach to the anterior cranial base. J Neurosurg 2008; 109 (2) 341-346
• 4 Andaluz N, Van Loveren HR, Keller JT, Zuccarello M. Anatomic and clinical study of the orbitopterional approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2003; 52 (5) 1140-1148 ; discussion 1148–1149
• 5 Aziz KM, Froelich SC, Cohen PL, Sanan A, Keller JT, van Loveren HR. The one-piece orbitozygomatic approach: the MacCarty burr hole and the inferior orbital fissure as keys to technique and application. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002; 144 (1) 15-24
• 6 Chanda A, Nanda A. Anatomical study of the orbitozygomatic transsellar-transcavernous-transclinoidal approach to the basilar artery bifurcation. J Neurosurg 2002l; 97 (1) 151-160
• 7 D'Ambrosio AL, Mocco J, Hankinson TC, Bruce JN, van Loveren HR. Quantification of the frontotemporal orbitozygomatic approach using a three-dimensional visualization and modeling application. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (3) (Suppl. 01) 251-260 ; discussion 260–261
• 8 Dare AO, Landi MK, Lopes DK, Grand W. Eyebrow incision for combined orbital osteotomy and supraorbital minicraniotomy: application to aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (4) 714-718
• 9 Dzierzanowski J, Słoniewski P, Rut M. Morphometry of the pterional and pterional-orbitozygomatic approaches to the basilar artery bifurcation by the use of neuronavigation systems: a new technical concept. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2008; 67 (4) 267-272
• 10 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM , et al. Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): 397-405 ; discussion 397–405
• 11 Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (3) 550-555 ; discussion 555–557
• 12 Jho HD. Orbital roof craniotomy via an eyebrow incision: a simplified anterior skull base approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1997; 40 (3) 91-97
• 13 Jian FZ, Santoro A, Innocenzi G, Wang XW, Liu SS, Cantore G. Frontotemporal orbitozygomatic craniotomy to exposure the cavernous sinus and its surrounding regions. Microsurgical anatomy. J Neurosurg Sci 2001; 45 (1) 19-28
• 14 McArthur LL. An aseptic surgical access to the pituitary body and its neighborhood. JAMA 1912; 58: 2009-2011
• 15 Schwartz MS, Anderson GJ, Horgan MA, Kellogg JX, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (6) 1020-1026
• 16 Seçkin H, Avci E, Uluç K, Niemann D, Başkaya MK. The work horse of skull base surgery: orbitozygomatic approach. Technique, modifications, and applications. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25 (6) E4
• 17 Yasargil MG, Fox JL, Ray MW. The operative approach to the aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery. In: Krayenbuhl H, , ed. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Vol 2. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1975: 113-170
• 18 de Divitiis E, Esposito F, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis O. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: high route or low route? A series of 51 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (3) 556-563 ; discussion 556–563
• 19 Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F. Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base and suprasellar lesions: indications and limitations. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (4) 677-687 ; discussion 687–689
• 20 Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Malkasian D, Kelly DF. Endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5) (Suppl. 02) 269-284 ; discussion 284–286
• 21 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh V, Nakaji P , et al. An anatomical evaluation of the mini-supraorbital approach and comparison with standard craniotomies. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (4) (Suppl. 02) ONS212-ONS220 ; discussion ONS220
• 22 Gonzalez LF, Zabramski JM. Anatomic and clinical study of the orbitopterional approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (4) 1031-1032 ; author reply 1032
• 23 Grand W, Landi MK, Daré AO. Transorbital keyhole approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2001; 49 (2) 483-484
• 24 Reisch R, Perneczky A. Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (4, Suppl): 242-255 ; discussion 242–255
• 25 Sindou MP. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (6) 1526-1527 ; author reply 1527
• 26 Ramos-Zúñiga R, Velázquez H, Barajas MA, López R, Sánchez E, Trejo S. Trans-supraorbital approach to supratentorial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (1) 125-130 ; discussion 130–131
• 27 Shanno G, Maus M, Bilyk J , et al. Image-guided transorbital roof craniotomy via a suprabrow approach: a surgical series of 72 patients. Neurosurgery 2001; 48 (3) 559-567 ; discussion 567–568
• 28 Steiger HJ, Schmid-Elsaesser R, Stummer W, Uhl E. Transorbital keyhole approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2001; 48 (2) 347-351 ; discussion 351–352
• 29 Warren WL, Grant GA. Transciliary orbitofrontozygomatic approach to lesions of the anterior cranial fossa. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5) (Suppl. 02) 324-329 ; discussion 329–330
• 30 Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Rhoton Jr AL, Kawashima M, Yoshioka N, Lewis SB. One-piece versus two-piece orbitozygomatic craniotomy: quantitative and qualitative considerations. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (4) (Suppl. 02) ONS-229-ONS-237 ; discussion ONS-237