Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 18(01): 021-026
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358660
Original Article
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Carolina Louise Cardoso
1   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Ângelo José Gonçalves Bós
2   Geriatrics and Gerontology Institute, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Andréa Krüger Gonçalves
3   Department of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Maira Rozenfeld Olchik
4   Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Leticia Sousa Flores
1   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Bruna Macagnin Seimetz
1   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Magda Aline Bauer
1   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Patricia Pérez Coradini
5   Comunicare Hearing Aids, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Adriane Ribeiro Teixeira
6   Department of Developmental Psychology and Personality, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Institute of Psychology, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

04 September 2013

06 September 2013

Publication Date:
07 November 2013 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Hearing screening allows the identification of individuals with hearing loss.

Aim To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a portable hearing screening device in middle-aged and older adults using the manufacturer scoring and a scoring system proposed by the researchers.

Methods In this transversal study, participants underwent anamnesis, otoscopy, and hearing screening using portable equipment. After this, a pure tone audiometry was performed, with participants classified into two groups: with and without hearing loss. The sensitivity and specificity of the hearing screening were calculated for the right and left ears using two methods of interpretation: the original method recommended by the manufacturer (criteria 1) and the method proposed by researchers (criteria 2).

Results The sample consisted of 55 individuals, 83.6% (n = 46) of whom were women. Per criteria 1, the sensitivities were 26.3 (right ear) and 21.4% (left ear). The specificity was 100% for both ears. Using criteria 2, the sensitivity was 94.7 (right ear) and 100% (left ear). The specificity was 74.3 (right ear) and 65.9% (left ear).

Conclusion This study showed that the criteria proposed by the manufacturer presented low sensitivity in the hearing screening. The criteria proposed by the researchers to achieve a more efficient performance reached high and balanced values for sensitivity and specificity.

 
  • References

  • 1 Onishi ET, Barreiro FCAB, Scharlach RC. Distúrbios da audição: implicações nas diferentes fases da vida. Saúde Coletiva 2011; 8: 62-66
  • 2 Gates GA, Mills JH. Presbycusis. Lancet 2005; 366: 1111-1120
  • 3 Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Fleming C, Beil T. Screening adults aged 50 years or older for hearing loss: a review of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 347-355
  • 4 Li-Korotky HS. Age-related hearing loss: quality of care for quality of life. Gerontologist 2012; 52: 265-271
  • 5 Bagai A, Thavendiranathan P, Detsky AS. Does this patient have hearing impairment?. JAMA 2006; 295: 416-428
  • 6 Veras RP, Mattos LC. Audiologia do envelhecimento: revisão da literatura e perspectivas atuais. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2007; 73: 128-134
  • 7 Bance M. Hearing and aging. CMAJ 2007; 176: 925-927
  • 8 Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol Assess 2007; 11: 1-294
  • 9 Baraldi GS, de Almeida LC, Borges ACC. Evolução da perda auditiva no decorrer do envelhecimento. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2007; 73: 64-70
  • 10 Samelli AG, Negretti CA, Ueda KS, Moreira RR, Schochat E. Comparação entre avaliação audiológica e screening: um estudo sobre presbiacusia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 77: 70-76
  • 11 Francelin MAS, Motti TFG, Morita I. As implicações sociais da deficiência auditiva adquirida em adultos. Saúde e Sociedade 2010; 19: 180-192
  • 12 Teixeira AR, Thedy RB, Jotz GP, de Barba MC. Depressive symptomatology in hearing impaired adults and elders: importance of the use of hearing aids. Intl Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 11: 453-458
  • 13 Cruz MS, Oliveira LR, Carandina L , et al. Prevalência de deficiência auditiva referida e causas atribuídas: um estudo de base populacional. Cad Saude Publica 2009; 25: 1123-1131
  • 14 Saito H, Nishiwaki Y, Michikawa T , et al. Hearing handicap predicts the development of depressive symptoms after 3 years in older community-dwelling Japanese. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58: 93-97
  • 15 Boi R, Racca L, Cavallero A , et al. Hearing loss and depressive symptoms in elderly patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012; 12: 440-445
  • 16 Kiely KM, Gopinath B, Mitchell P, Luszcz M, Anstey KJ. Cognitive, health, and sociodemographic predictors of longitudinal decline in hearing acuity among older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012; 67: 997-1003
  • 17 Gates GA, Murphy M, Rees TS, Fraher A. Screening for handicapping hearing loss in the elderly. J Fam Pract 2003; 52: 56-62
  • 18 Scudder SG, Culbertson DS, Waldron CM, Stewart J. Predictive validity and reliability of adult hearing screening techniques. J Am Acad Audiol 2003; 14: 9-19
  • 19 Mattos LC, Veras RP. A prevalência da perda auditiva em uma população de idosos da cidade do Rio de Janeiro: um estudo seccional. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2007; 73: 654-659
  • 20 Fook L, Morgan R. Hearing impairment in older people: a review. Postgrad Med J 2000; 76: 537-541
  • 21 Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new reseach findings and clinical implications. JRRD 2005; 42 (4) (Suppl. 02) 9-24
  • 22 Yueh B, Shapiro N, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: scientific review. JAMA 2003; 289: 1976-1985
  • 23 Bentur N, Valinsky L, Lemberger J, Benmosche Y, Heymann AD. Primary care intervention programme to improve early detection of hearing loss in the older adult. JLO 2012; 126: 574-579
  • 24 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1997. Guidelines for audiologic screening [accessed on October 21, 2012]. Available at: http://www.asha.org/docs/html/GL1997-00199.html#sec1.9.1
  • 25 Siemens [Internet]. Your hearing—simplified by HearCheck. [accessed on May 2012, 25] Available at: http://hearing.siemens.com/Global/en/professional-area/workflow/hear-check/hear-check.html
  • 26 World Health Organization. WHO/PDH/97.3. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO: 1997. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1997/WHO_PDH_97.3.pdf . Accesssed on May 25, 2012.
  • 27 Eekhof JAH, De Bock GH, Schaapveld K, Springer MP. Effects of screening for disorders among the elderly: an intervention study in general practice. Fam Pract 2000; 17: 329-333
  • 28 Valete-Rosalino CM, Rozenfeld S. Triagem auditiva em idosos: comparação entre auto-relato e audiometria. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2005; 71: 193-200
  • 29 Yueh B, Collins MP, Souza PE , et al. Screening for Auditory Impairment-Which Hearing Assessment Test (SAI-WHAT): RCT design and baseline characteristics. Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 28: 303-315
  • 30 Hidalgo JLT, Gras CB, Lapeira JMT , et al. The Hearing-Dependent Daily Activities Scale to evaluate impact of hearing loss in older people. Ann Fam Med 2008; 6: 441-447
  • 31 Weinstein BE. Hearing loss in the older adult: a new look at an old problem. In: Katz J, , ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009: 712-725
  • 32 Carvalho JA, Rodríguez-Wong LL. A transição da estrutura etária da população brasileira na primeira metade do século XXI. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24: 597-605
  • 33 Calais LL, Borges ACLC, Baraldi GS, de Almeida LC. Queixas e preocupações otológicas e as dificuldades de comunicação de indivíduos idosos. Rev Bras Fonoaudiol 2008; 13: 12-19
  • 34 Teixeira AR, Almeida LG, Jotz GP, de Barba MC. Qualidade de vida de adultos e idosos pós adaptação de próteses auditivas. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2008; 13: 357-361
  • 35 Torres-Russotto D, Landau WM, Harding GW, Bohne BA, Sun K, Sinatra PM. Calibrated finger rub auditory screening test (CALFRAST). Neurology 2009; 72: 1595-1600
  • 36 Yueh B, Collins MP, Souza PE , et al. Long-term effectiveness of screening for hearing loss: the screening for auditory impairment—which hearing assessment test (SAI-WHAT) randomized trial. JAGS 2010; 58: 427-434
  • 37 Lichtenstein MJ, Bess FH, Logan SA. Validation of screening tools for identifying hearing-impaired elderly in primary care. JAMA 1988; 259: 2875-2878
  • 38 Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Diagnóstico. In: Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Epidemiologia Clínica: Elementos Essenciais. 3rd ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1996: 52-83
  • 39 Goulart BNG, Chiari BM. Testes de rastreamento x testes de diagnóstico: atualidades no contexto da atuação fonoaudiológica. Pro Fono 2007; 19: 223-232