Open Access
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 18(01): 021-026
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358660
Original Article
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Sensitivity and Specificity of Portable Hearing Screening in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Authors

  • Carolina Louise Cardoso

    1   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Ângelo José Gonçalves Bós

    2   Geriatrics and Gerontology Institute, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Andréa Krüger Gonçalves

    3   Department of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Maira Rozenfeld Olchik

    4   Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Leticia Sousa Flores

    1   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Bruna Macagnin Seimetz

    1   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Magda Aline Bauer

    1   Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Patricia Pérez Coradini

    5   Comunicare Hearing Aids, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Adriane Ribeiro Teixeira

    6   Department of Developmental Psychology and Personality, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Institute of Psychology, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Further Information

Publication History

04 September 2013

06 September 2013

Publication Date:
07 November 2013 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Hearing screening allows the identification of individuals with hearing loss.

Aim To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a portable hearing screening device in middle-aged and older adults using the manufacturer scoring and a scoring system proposed by the researchers.

Methods In this transversal study, participants underwent anamnesis, otoscopy, and hearing screening using portable equipment. After this, a pure tone audiometry was performed, with participants classified into two groups: with and without hearing loss. The sensitivity and specificity of the hearing screening were calculated for the right and left ears using two methods of interpretation: the original method recommended by the manufacturer (criteria 1) and the method proposed by researchers (criteria 2).

Results The sample consisted of 55 individuals, 83.6% (n = 46) of whom were women. Per criteria 1, the sensitivities were 26.3 (right ear) and 21.4% (left ear). The specificity was 100% for both ears. Using criteria 2, the sensitivity was 94.7 (right ear) and 100% (left ear). The specificity was 74.3 (right ear) and 65.9% (left ear).

Conclusion This study showed that the criteria proposed by the manufacturer presented low sensitivity in the hearing screening. The criteria proposed by the researchers to achieve a more efficient performance reached high and balanced values for sensitivity and specificity.