Zahnmedizin up2date, Inhaltsverzeichnis Zahnmedizin up2date 2014; 8(5): 467-482DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357973 Zahnerhaltung, Prävention, Restauration Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New YorkProblemlösungen in der restaurativen Zahnheilkunde Cornelia Frese , Diana Wolff , Hans Jörg StaehleArtikel empfehlen Abstract Podcast Artikel einzeln kaufen Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik Volltext Referenzen Literatur 1 Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH, Kreulen CM. Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 36-41 2 Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 1063-1067 3 Frese C, Wolff D, Staehle H. Proximal Box Elevation With Resin Composite and the Dogma of Biological Width: Clinical R2-Technique and Critical Review. Oper Dent 2014; 39: 22-31 4 Kuper NK, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries. J Dent 2012; 40: 241-247 5 Miller WD. Lehrbuch der Conservirenden Zahnheikunde. 1896: 199 6 McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Wilson AD. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J 1985; 158: 410-414 7 Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 659-664 8 Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Losche GM, Roulet J. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 2000; 28: 399-405 9 Dietrich T, Losche AC, Losche GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 1999; 27: 119-128 10 Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998; 10: 47-54 quiz 56 11 Lefever D, Gregor L, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Supragingival relocation of subgingivally located margins for adhesive inlays/onlays with different materials. J Adhes Dent 2012; 14: 561-567 12 Rocca GT, Gregor L, Sandoval MJ, Krejci I, Dietschi D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1385-1393 13 Rocca GT, Krejci I. Bonded indirect restorations for posterior teeth: from cavity preparation to provisionalization. Quintessence Int 2007; 38: 371-379 14 Zaruba M, Gohring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 317-324 15 Frankenberger R, Hehn J, Hajtó J, Kramer N, Naumann M, Koch A et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of ceramic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 177-183 16 Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Dippold C, Vosen VE, Naumann M, Jablonski-Momeni A et al. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro. J Dent 2012; 40: 1068-1073 17 Wirsching E, Loomans BA, Klaiber B, Dorfer CE. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 2011; 39: 386-390 18 Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, de Boer T, Pesschier D, Bronkhorst E. Voids and porosities in class I micropreparations filled with various resin composites. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 9-14
