manuelletherapie, Table of Contents manuelletherapie 2013; 17(04): 162-167DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356788 Schwerpunkt Schmerz Vertiefung Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New YorkWie beeinflusst Manuelle Therapie den Schmerz? Annina Schmid 1 Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom, URL: www.neuro-research.ch› Author AffiliationsRecommend Article Abstract Buy Article Zusammenfassung Diverse klinische Praxisrichtlinien empfehlen Manuelle Therapie nicht nur bei Bewegungseinschränkungen, sondern auch bei muskuloskeletalen Schmerzen [2], [55]. Dr. Annina Schmid interessiert sich für die Wirkungsweise von Manueller Therapie. In diesem Artikel fasst sie die drei Hauptwirkungsweisen zusammen, die eine Schmerzlinderung durch Manuelle Therapie erklären könnten. Full Text References Literatur 1 Abbott JH, Patla CE, Jensen RH. The initial effects of an elbow mobilization with movement techniqü on grip strength in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. Man Ther 2001; 6 (03) 163-169 2 Airaksinen O et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain European Spine Journal 2006; 15 (Suppl. 02) 192-300 3 Aquino RL et al. Applying Joint Mobilization at Different Cervical Vertebral Levels dös not Inflünce Immediate Pain Reduction in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Man Manip Ther 2009; 17 (02) 95-100 4 Bialosky JE et al. A randomized sham-controlled trial of a neurodynamic techniqü in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Orthopädic and Sports Physical Therapy 2009; 39 (10) 709-723 5 Bialosky JE et al. Spinal manipulative therapy has an immediate effect on thermal pain sensitivity in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 2009; 89 (12) 1292-1303 6 Bialosky JE et al. The influnce of expectation on spinal manipulation induced hypoalgesia: an experimental study in normal subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 19-19 7 Bialosky JE et al. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther 2009; 14 (05) 531-538 8 Bialosky JE et al. The relationship of the audible pop to hypoalgesia associated with high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation: a secondary analysis of an experimental study in pain-free participants. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010; 33 (02) 117-124 9 Brodersen KH et al. Decoding the perception of pain from fMRI using multivariate pattern analysis. Neuroimage 2012; 63 (03) 1162-1170 10 Cassidy JD, Lopes AA, Yong-Hing K. The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992; 15 (09) 570-575 11 Chiu T, Wright A. Comparing the effects of two cervical mobilisation techniqüs on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal 1998; 16: 13-18 12 Chiu T, Wright A. To compare the effects of different rates of application of a cervical mobilisation techniqü on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Manual Therapy 1996; 1 (04) 198-203 13 Coppieters MW et al. The immediate effects of a cervical lateral glide treatment techniqü in patients with neurogenic cervicobrachial pain. Journal of Orthopädic and Sports Physical Therapy 2003; a 33 (07) 369-378 14 Coronado RA et al. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2012; 22 (05) 752-767 15 Cramer G et al. Basic science research related to chiropractic spinal adjusting: the state of the art and recommendations revisited. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29 (09) 726-761 16 George SZ et al. Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on thermal pain sensitivity: an experimental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 68-68 17 Glover JR, Morris JG, Khosla T. Back pain: a randomized clinical trial of rotational manipulation of the trunk. British Journal of Industrial Medicine 1974; 31 (01) 59-64 18 Haas M et al. Efficacy of cervical endplay assessment as an indicator for spinal manipulation. Spine 2003; 28 (11) 1091-1096 19 Henderson CN. The basis for spinal manipulation: chiropractic perspective of indications and theory. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2012; 22 (05) 632-642 20 Hsieh CY et al. Mulligan‘s mobilization with movement for the thumb: a single case report using magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the positional fault hypothesis. Man Ther 2002; 7 (01) 44-49 21 Iannetti GD, Mouraux A. From the neuromatrix to the pain matrix (and back). Exp Brain Res 2010; 205 (01) 1-12 22 Kavanagh J. Is there a positional fault at the inferior tibiofibular joint in patients with acute or chronic ankle sprains compared to normals?. Man Ther 1999; 4 (01) 19-24 23 Korr IM. Proprioceptors and somatic dysfunction. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1975; 74 (07) 638-650 24 Kulig K, Landel R, Powers CM. Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization. Journal of Orthopädic and Sports Physical Therapy 2004; 34 (02) 57-64 25 Lovick TA, Li P. Integrated function of neurones in the rostral ventrolateral medulla. Progress in Pain Research 1989; 81: 223-232 26 Lovick TA. Interactions between descending pathways from the dorsal and ventrolateral periaqüductal gray matter in teh rat. In: De Paulis A, Bandler R, Editors The midbrain periaqüductal gray matter. New York: Plenum Press; 1991 27 Maigne JY, Vautravers P. Mechanism of action of spinal manipulative therapy. Joint, Bone, Spine 2003; 70 (05) 336-341 28 Maitland GD. Manipulation der Wirbelsäule. 2. Auflage. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 1994 29 Malisza KL et al. Functional MRI involving painful stimulation of the ankle and the effect of physiotherapy joint mobilization. Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 21 (05) 489-496 30 Malisza KL et al. Functional MRI of the rat lumbar spinal cord involving painful stimulation and the effect of peripheral joint mobilization. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2003; 18 (02) 152-159 31 McCollam RL, Benson CJ. Effects of postero-anterior mobilization on lumbar extension and flexion. J of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 1993; 1: 134-141 32 McGregor AH, Wragg P, Gedroyc MW. Can interventional MRI provide an insight into the mechanics of a posterior-anterior mobilisation?. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001; 16 (10) 926-929 33 McGuiness J, Vicenzino B, Wright A. Inflünce of a cervical mobilization techniqü on respiratory and cardiovascular function. Man Ther 1997; 2 (04) 216-220 34 McLean S et al. A pilot study of the manual force levels required to produce manipulation induced hypoalgesia. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17 (04) 304-308 35 Paungmali A et al. Hypoalgesic and sympathöxcitatory effects of mobilization with movement for lateral epicondylalgia. Physical Therapy 2003; 83 (04) 374-383 36 Petersen N, Vicenzino B, Wright A. The effects of a cervical mobilisation techniqü on sympathetic outflow to the upper limb in normal subjects. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1993; 9 (03) 149-156 37 Pickar JG. Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation. Spine Journal 2002; 2 (05) 357-371 38 Price DD et al. Peripheral suppression of first pain and central summation of second pain evoked by noxious heat pulses. Pain 1977; 3 (01) 57-68 39 Rolke R et al. Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 2006; 10 (01) 77-88 40 Roy RA, Boucher JP, Comtois AS. Inflammatory response following a short-term course of chiropractic treatment in subjects with and without chronic low back pain. J Chiropr Med 2010; 9 (03) 107-114 41 Rubinstein SM et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for acute low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 9 CD008880 42 Rubinstein SM et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: an update of a Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36 (13) E825-E846 43 Schafer A et al. Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study. European Spine Journal 2011; 20 (03) 482-490 44 Schafer A, Hall T, Briffa K. Classification of low back-related leg pain - a proposed patho-mechanism-based approach. Man Ther 2009; 14 (02) 222-230 45 Schmid A et al. Paradigm shift in manual therapy?. Evidence for a central nervous system component in the response to passive cervical joint mobilisation Man Ther 2008; 13 05 387-396 46 Schmid AB et al. Effect of splinting and exercise on intraneural edema of the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome-an MRI study to reveal therapeutic mechanisms. J Orthop Res 2012; 47 Schomacher J. The effect of an analgesic mobilization techniqü when applied at symptomatic or asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Man Manip Ther 2009; 17 02 101-108 48 So PS, Jiang Y, Qin Y. Touch therapies for pain relief in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (04) CD006535 49 Soon BT et al. A crossover study on the effect of cervical mobilization on motor function and pressure pain threshold in pain-free individuals. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010; 33 (09) 652-658 50 Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Manual Therapy 2001; 6 (02) 72-81 51 Sterling M. Kinästhetic exercise dös not improve outcome (or kinästhesia) in patients with acute whiplash. Aust J Physiother 2001; 47 (01) 67-67 52 Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA, Injeyan HS, Rügg R. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29 (01) 14-21 53 Terrett AC, Vernon H. Manipulation and pain tolerance. A controlled study of the effect of spinal manipulation on paraspinal cutaneous pain tolerance levels American Journal of Physical Medicine 1984; 63 05 217-225 54 Tullberg T et al. Manipulation dös not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint. A röntgen stereophotogrammetric analysis Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23 10 1124-1128 discussion 1129 55 van Tulder M et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care European Spine Journal 2006; 15 (Suppl. 02) S169-S191 56 Vernon H. Biological rationale for possible benefits of spinal manipulation. In: Chiropractic in the United States: training, practice and research. Cherkin CD, Mootz RD, Editors AHCPR Publication 1997 No 98-N002 105-117 57 Vicenzino B. An Investigation of the effects of spinal manual therapy on forequarter pressure and thermal pain thresholds and sympathetic nervous system activity in asymptomatic subjects: a preliminary report. In: Moving in on pain. Shacklock M, Editor Australia: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995 58 Vicenzino B et al. An investigation of the interrelationship between manipulative therapy-induced hypoalgesia and sympathöxcitation. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1998; b 21 (07) 448-453 59 Vicenzino B et al. Cardiovascular and respiratory changes produced by lateral glide mobilization of the cervical spine. Manual Therapy 1998; a 3 (02) 67-71 60 Vicenzino B. Mobilisation with Movement: the Art and the Science. Australia: Elsevier; 2011 61 Vicenzino B et al. Specific manipulative therapy treatment for chronic lateral epicondylalgia produces uniqüly characteristic hypoalgesia. Man Ther 2001; 6 (04) 205-212 62 Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A. Sudomotor changes induced by neural mobilisation techniqüs in asymptomatic subjects. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 1994; 2 (02) 66-74 63 Vicenzino B, Collins D, Wright A. The initial effects of a cervical spine manipulative physiotherapy treatment on the pain and dysfunction of lateral epicondylalgia. Pain 1996; 68: 69-74 64 Vicenzino B, Paungmali A, Teys P. Mulligan‘s mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: current concepts from a critical review of literature. Man Ther 2007; 12 (02) 98-108 65 Willett E, Hebron C, Krouwel O. The initial effects of different rates of lumbar mobilisations on pressure pain thresholds in asymptomatic subjects. Man Ther 2010; 15 (02) 173-178 66 Williams NH et al. Psychological response in spinal manipulation (PRISM): a systematic review of psychological outcomes in randomised controlled trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2007; 15 (04) 271-283 67 Woolf CJ. Overcoming obstacles to developing new analgesics. Nature Medicine 2010; 16 (11) 1241-1247 68 Wright A. Hypoalgesia post-manipualtive therapy: a review of a potential neurophysiological mechanism. Manual Therapy 1995; (01) 11-16 69 Wright A. Pain-Relieving Effects of Cervical Manual Therapy. In: Physical Therapy of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine. USA: Churchill Livingstone; 2002 70 Yang G, Crawford RC, Wang JH. Proliferation and collagen production of human patellar tendon fibroblasts in response to cyclic uniaxial stretching in serum-free conditions. Journal of Biomechanics 2004; 37 (10) 1543-1550 71 Zusman M, Edwards B, Donaghy A. Investigation of a proposed mechanism of the relief of spinal pain with passive joint movement. Journall of Manual Medicine 1989; 4: 58-61 72 Zusman M. There‘s something about passive movement. Medical Hypotheses 2010; 75 (01) 106-110
