Modifications to the Endoscopic Approach for Anterior Skull Base Lesions Improve Postoperative Sinonasal Symptoms

Christopher F. Thompson; Jeffrey D. Suh; Yuan Liu; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B. Wang

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1356492

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75(01): 065-072
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356492

Original Article

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Modifications to the Endoscopic Approach for Anterior Skull Base Lesions Improve Postoperative Sinonasal Symptoms

Authors

Christopher F. Thompson

¹Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States
Jeffrey D. Suh

¹Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States
Yuan Liu

¹Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States
Marvin Bergsneider

²Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States
Marilene B. Wang

¹Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States

Abstract

Background/Objective Our institution previously showed that patients experience significant postoperative sinonasal symptoms for the first few months after endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal skull base surgery (eTNTS). Since our initial study we have modified our technique, discontinuing routine resection of the middle turbinate, maxillary antrostomies, and nasoseptal flaps. In this study, we analyze whether these technical modifications decrease postoperative sinonasal morbidity after eTNTS.

Methods A retrospective review was performed of 93 consecutive patients who underwent eTNTS at a tertiary academic medical center from August 2011 to August 2012.

Main Outcome Measures Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-20 and SNOT-22 scores preoperatively and after surgery.

Results Compared with our previous study, our new cohort experienced a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in SNOT scores for the need to blow nose, runny nose, postnasal discharge, thick nasal discharge, wake up at night, reduced concentration, and frustrated/restless/irritable. Within the new cohort, patients who did not have a nasoseptal flap or middle turbinate resection had less worsening and faster improvement of nasal symptom scores after surgery.

Conclusions Preserving normal sinonasal physiology during eTNTS by limiting middle turbinate resections, avoiding unnecessary maxillary antrostomies, and reducing the use of nasoseptal flaps when feasible results in less sinonasal morbidity and more rapid recovery during the postoperative period.

Keywords

skull base - endonasal surgical approach - endoscopic surgery - nasoseptal flap

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Liu JK, Das K, Weiss MH, Laws Jr ER, Couldwell WT. The history and evolution of transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg 2001; 95 (6) 1083-1096
2 Eloy JA, Vivero RJ, Hoang K , et al. Comparison of transnasal endoscopic and open craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (5) 834-840
3 Tabaee A, Anand VK, Barrón Y , et al. Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2009; 111 (3) 545-554
4 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A , et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2002; 45 (4) 193-200
5 Balaker AE, Bergsneider M, Martin NA, Wang MB. Evolution of sinonasal symptoms following endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20 (4) 245-251
6 McCoul ED, Anand VK, Bedrosian JC, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic skull base surgery and its impact on sinonasal-related quality of life. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2 (2) 174-181
7 de Almeida JR, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Carrau RL, Vescan AD. Nasal morbidity following endoscopic skull base surgery: a prospective cohort study. Head Neck 2011; 33 (4) 547-551
8 Morley AD, Sharp HR. A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems—which is best?. Clin Otolaryngol 2006; 31 (2) 103-109
9 Piccirillo JF, Merritt Jr MG, Richards ML. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 126 (1) 41-47
10 Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E3
11 Kennedy DW. Middle turbinate resection: evaluating the issues—should we resect normal middle turbinates?. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124 (1) 107
12 Swanson PB, Lanza DC, Vining EM, Kennedy DW. The effect of middle turbinate resection upon the frontal sinus. Am J Rhinol 1995; 9 (4) 191-197
13 Nyquist GG, Anand VK, Brown S, Singh A, Tabaee A, Schwartz TH. Middle turbinate preservation in endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery of the anterior skull base. Skull Base 2010; 20 (5) 343-347
14 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
15 Rivera-Serrano CM, Snyderman CH, Gardner P , et al. Nasoseptal “rescue” flap: a novel modification of the nasoseptal flap technique for pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (5) 990-993