Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2013; 45(03): 161-172
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353150
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Spezifische CMD-Befunde nach klinischer Funktionsanalyse und manueller Strukturanalyse bei Patienten mit juveniler idiopathischer Arthritis

Specific TMJ Findings after Clinical Functional Analysis and Manual Structural Analysis in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
D. Heekeren
1   Kieferorthopädische Fachpraxis, Berlin
,
R. Beyer
1   Kieferorthopädische Fachpraxis, Berlin
,
A. Bumann
1   Kieferorthopädische Fachpraxis, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 September 2013 (online)

Zusammenfassung

In dieser Studie wurden 155 Patienten mit juveniler idiopathischer Arthritis (JIA) hinsichtlich spezifischer Kiefergelenkbefunde untersucht. Bei allen Patienten wurde eine klinische Funktionsanalyse und eine manuelle Strukturanalyse durchgeführt. Zusätzlich lagen von allen Patienten Panoramaschichtaufnahmen vor.

Die klinische Funktionsanalyse ergab bei 11,6% der Patienten Schmerzbefunde, bei 5,2% Bewegungseinschränkungen und bei 12,9% Gelenkgeräusche. Mithilfe der manuellen Strukturanalyse wurden bei 47,1% der Patienten Schmerzen, bei 20,6% Bewegungseinschränkungen und bei 39,3% Gelenkgeräusche festgestellt. Bei passiven Bewegungen wurden vermehrt „zu harte“ Endgefühle als Zeichen einer Kapselverkürzung ­gefunden.

Röntgenologisch bestanden bei 28,7% der Patienten Abflachungen der Kondylen. Die mittlere Mundöffnung war bei Patienten mit Abflachungen signifikant geringer als bei Patienten ohne morphologische Veränderungen der Kondylen. Der Kjellberg-Index und damit die Länge des Proc. condylaris korrelierte mit „zu harten“ Endgefühlen bei ventraler Translation und Traktion.

Die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Studie erlauben 2 Konklusionen: Erstens ist eine manuelle Strukturanalyse der klinischen Funktionsanalyse deutlich überlegen, da tatsächlich vorhandene Befunde in deutlich höherem Maße erfasst werden. Bildgebende Befunde aus Panoramaschichtaufnahmen (PSA) korrelieren mit den manuell erhobenen Befunden, obwohl zahlreiche neuere Studien zeigen, dass digitale Volumentomografien (DVT) der PSA in der röntgenologischen Bildgebung signifikant überlegen ist. Manuelle Strukturanalyse und DVT sind daher aktuell die Methoden der Wahl für eine spezifische Untersuchung von Patienten mit JIA.

Abstract

In this study, 155 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have been investigated with regard to specific TMJ findings. Clinical functional analysis and manual structural analysis were performed in all patients. In addition, panoramic radiographs were available for each patient.

The clinical functional analysis revealed pain in 11.6% of the patients, movement restrictions in 5.2% and joint sounds were found in 12.9% of the patients. By manual structure analysis pain was found in 47.1% of patients, 20.6% showed movement restrictions and in 39.3% of the cases joint sounds could be detected. In cases of limited passive movements the end feeling „too hard“ was found as a sign of capsule shortening.

Flattening of the condyles could be found radiographically in 28.7% of patients. The average mouth opening was significantly lower in pa­tients with flattening than in patients with no morphological changes of the condyles. The Kjellberg index and thus the length of the condylar process correlated with „too hard“ end feelings in anterior translation and traction.

The results of this study allow 2 conclusions: First, a manual structural analysis is definitely superior compared to a regular clinical functional analysis as existing findings are detected in a significantly higher degree. Radiological condylar findings from a panoramic radiograph show correlations with the manually collected findings, although several recent studies show that the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is significantly superior to the panoramic x-ray regarding the radiographic imaging. Manual structural analysis (MSA) for clinical assessment and radiographic imaging with a CBCT are therefore currently the methods of choice for a specific examination of patients with JIA.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Wahezi DM, Ilowite NT. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an update on current pharmacotherapy and future perspectives. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013; 14: 975-989
  • 2 Wood PH. Nomenclature and classification of arthritis in children. In: Munthe E. (eds.). EULAR-Bulletin, Monograph Series 3: EULAR/WHO-Workshop (The care of Rheumatic Children, Oslo 21–24.3.1977). Basel: EULAR Publishers; 1978: 47-50
  • 3 Manners PJ, Bower C. Worldwide prevalence of juvenile arthritis why does it vary so much?. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 1520-1530
  • 4 Saurenmann R. The difficult diagnosis of temporomandibular joint arthritis. J Rheumatol 2012; 39: 1778-1780
  • 5 Cobb S. The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Public Health 1960; 56: 1657-1662
  • 6 Synodinos PN, Polyzois I. Oral health and orthodontic considerations in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: review of the literature and report of a case. J Ir Dent Assoc 2008; 54: 29-36
  • 7 Cannizzaro E, Schroeder S, Müller LM et al. Temporomandibular joint involvement in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2011; 38: 510-515
  • 8 Tzaribachev N, Weber D, Horger M. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the silent killer of pediatric temporomandibular joints. Z Rheumatol 2010; 69: 124-129
  • 9 Mandall NA, Gray R, O’Brien KD et al. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): a screening study to measure class II skeletal pattern, TMJ PDS and use of systemic corticosteroids. J Orthod 2010; 37: 6-15
  • 10 Pirttiniemi P, Peltomäki T, Müller L et al. Abnormal mandibular growth and the condylar cartilage. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 1-11
  • 11 Gönner-Ozkan V, Meyer P, Tzaribachev N. Interdisciplinary treatment of temporomandibular inflammation in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Z Rheumatol 2010; 69: 130-134
  • 12 Arvidsson LZ, Fjeld MG, Smith HJ et al. Craniofacial growth disturbance is related to temporomandibular joint abnormality in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, but normal facial profile was also found at the 27-year follow-up. Scand J Rheumatol 2010; 39: 373-379
  • 13 Still GF. On a form of chronic joint disease in children. Medico. Chi­rurgical Transactions 1896; 80: 37-59
  • 14 Billiau AD, Hu Y, Verdonck A et al. Temporomandibular joint arthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: prevalence, clinical and radiological signs, and relation to dentofacial morphology. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1925-1933
  • 15 Twilt M, Schulten AJ, Prahl-Andersen B et al. Long-term follow-up of craniofacial alterations in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 1057-1062
  • 16 von Bremen J, Ruf S. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis – and now?: a systematic literature review of changes in craniofacial morphology. J Orofac Orthop 2012; 73: 265-276
  • 17 Hu Y, Billiau AD, Verdonck A et al. Variation in dentofacial morphology and occlusion in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subjects: a case-control study. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 51-58
  • 18 Goodwill CJ, Steggles BG. Destruction of the temporomandibular joint in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1966; 25: 133-136
  • 19 Jämsä T, Rönning O. The facial skeleton in children affected by rheumatoid arthritis: a roentgen-cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1985; 7: 48-56
  • 20 Farronato G, Carletti V, Giannini L et al. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis with temporomandibular joint involvement: functional treatment. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2011; 12: 131-134
  • 21 Cyriax J. Textbook of orthopaedic medicine. Tindall & Cassell; London: 1969
  • 22 Hansson TL, Honnee W, Hesse JR. Funktionsstörungen des Kausystems. Hüthig; Heidelberg: 1987
  • 23 Bumann A, Groot Landeweer G. Die funktionelle Betrachtung des Kausystems als Grundlage der manuellen Funktionsanalyse. I. Theoretische Ausführung zur Basisuntersuchung. Z Stomatol 1991; 88: 473-483
  • 24 Bumann A, Groot Landeweer G. Die „Manuelle Funktionsanalyse“. Die Erweiterte Untersuchung. Phillip J 1992; 5: 207-214
  • 25 Bumann A, Groot Landeweer G. Die „Manuelle Funktionsanalyse“. Die Basisuntersuchung. Phillip J 1992; 9: 137-142
  • 26 Bumann A, Groot Landeweer G, Lotzmann U. Die Bedeutung der Gelenkspieltechniken im Rahmen der manuellen Funktionsanalyse. Zahnärztl Welt 1993; 102: 338-342
  • 27 Bumann A, Lotzmann U. Funktionsanalyse und Therapieprinzipien. Thieme; Stuttgart: 2000
  • 28 Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: Comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 429-438
  • 29 Meng JH, Zhabg WL, Liu DG et al. Diagnostic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis using cone beam computed tomography compared with conventional radiographic technology. Beijing Da Xuc Bao 2007; 18: 26-29
  • 30 Schmitter M, Kress B, Hahnel S et al. The effect of quality of temporomandibular joint MR images on interrater agreement. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 253-258
  • 31 Limchaichana N, Petersson A, Rohlin M. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of degenerative and inflammatory temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 521-536
  • 32 Alkhader M, Ohbayashi N, Tetsumura A et al. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting osseous abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint and its correlation with cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 270-276
  • 33 Karhulahti T, Rönning O, Jämsä T. Mandibular condyle lesions, jaw movements, and occlusal status in 15-year-old children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 1: 17-26
  • 34 Kjellberg H, Ekestubbe A, Kiliaridis S et al. Condylar height on panoramic radiographs. A methologic study with a clinical application. Acta Odont Scand 1994; 52: 43-50
  • 35 Weiss PF, Arabshahi B, Johnson A et al. High prevalence of temporomandibular joint arthritis at disease onset in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, as detected by magnetic resonance imaging but not by ultrasound. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58: 1189-1196
  • 36 Müller L, Kellenberger CJ, Cannizzaro E et al. Early diagnosis of temporomandibular joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study comparing clinical examination and ultrasound to magnetic resonance imaging. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48: 680-685
  • 37 Twilt M, Mobers SM, Arends LR et al. Temporomandibular involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 1418-1422
  • 38 Twilt M, Arends LR, Cate RT et al. Incidence of temporomandibular involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2007; 36: 184-188
  • 39 Twilt M, Schulten AJ, Verschure F et al. Long-term follow-up of temporomandibular joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 546-552
  • 40 Könönen M, Kilpinen E. Comparison of three radiographic methods in screening of temporomandibular joint involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Acta Odont Scand 1990; 48: 271-277
  • 41 Sidiropoulou-Chatzigianni S, Papadopoulos MA, Kolokithas G. Mandibular condyle lesions in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008; 45: 57-62
  • 42 Leksell E, Ernberg M, Magnusson B et al. Orofacial pain and dysfunction in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case-control study. Scand J Rheumatol 2012; 41: 375-378
  • 43 Kjellberg H. Juvenile chronic arthritis, dentofacial morphology, growth, mandibular function and orthodontic treatment. Swed Dent J Supp 1995; 109: 1-56
  • 44 Mussler A, Allozy B, Landau H et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging signs and clinical findings in follow-up examinations in children and juveniles with temporomandibular joint involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rofo 2010; 182: 36-44
  • 45 Stoll ML, Sharpe T, Beukelman T et al. Risk factors for temporomandibular joint arthritis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2012; 39: 1880-1887
  • 46 Friction JR, Schiffman EL. Reliability of the craniomandibular index. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 1359-1364
  • 47 Friction JR, Schiffman EL. The craniomandibular index. Validity. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 222-228
  • 48 Grosfeldt O, Czarnecka B, Drecka-Kuzan K et al. Clinical investigations of the temporomandibular joint in children and adolescents with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1973; 2: 145-149
  • 49 Olsen L, Eckerdal O, Hallosten AL et al. Craniomandubular function in juvenile chronic arthritis. Swed Dent J 1991; 15: 71-83
  • 50 Hanna V, Rider SF, Moore TL et al. Effects of Systemic Onset Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis on facial Morphology and temporomandibular Joint Form and Function. J Rheumatol 1996; 23: 155-158
  • 51 Rönning O, Väliaho ML, Laaksonen AL. The involvement of the temporomandibular joint in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1974; 3: 89-96
  • 52 Hesse JR, Hansson TL. Factors influencing joint mobility in general and in particular respect of the craniomandibular articulation: a literature review. J Craniomandib Disord 1988; 2: 19-28
  • 53 Graham TB. Imaging in juvenile arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2005; 17: 574-578
  • 54 Honda K, Larheim TA, Maruhashi K et al. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Denotmaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 152-157
  • 55 Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80
  • 56 Fu KY, Zhang WL, Liu DG et al. Cone Beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2007; 42: 417-420
  • 57 Lewis EL, Dolwick MF, Abramowicz S et al. Contemporary imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Dent Clin Noth Am 2008; 52: 8758-8790
  • 58 Barghan S, Merril R, Tetradis S. Cone beam computed tomography imaging in the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint. J Calif Dent assoc 2010; 38: 33-39
  • 59 Farronato G, Garagiola U, Carletti V et al. Change in condylar and mandibular morphology in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Cone Beam volumetric imaging. Minerva Stomatol 2010; 59: 519-534
  • 60 Ferraz Jr AM, Devito KL, Guimarães JP. Temporomandibular disorder in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: clinical evaluation and correlation with the findings of cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114: e51-e57
  • 61 Huntjens E, Kiss G, Wouters C et al. Condylar asymmetry in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 545-551
  • 62 Larheim TA, Höyeraal HM, Stabrun AE et al. The temporomandibular joint in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1982; 11: 5-12
  • 63 Habibi S, Ellis J, Strike H et al. Safety and efficacy of US-guided CS injection into temporomandibular joints in children with active JIA. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51: 874-877
  • 64 Stoll ML, Good J, Sharpe T et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections to the temporomandibular joints are safe and appear to be effective therapy in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: 1802-1807
  • 65 Bjornland T, Larheim TA, Haanaes HR. Surgical treatment of temporo-mandibular joints in patients with chronic arthritic disease: preoperative findings and one-year follow-up. Cranio 1992; 10: 205-210