Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 17(04): 424-428
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1352500
Case Report
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Cochlear Implants in Children Diagnosed with CHARGE Syndrome

Carolina Costa Cardoso
1   Audiologist; Speech Therapy, University Center Federal District (UNIPLAN), Brasília/DF, Brazil
,
Michelle Sales de Meneses
1   Audiologist; Speech Therapy, University Center Federal District (UNIPLAN), Brasília/DF, Brazil
,
Isabella Monteiro de Castro Silva
2   Audiologist; Speech Therapy, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília/DF, Brazil
,
Angela Maria Vaccaro Silva Alves
3   Audiologist; Speech Therapy, Pontifical Catholic University (PUCSP), São Paulo/SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 November 2011

18 March 2012

Publication Date:
13 September 2013 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The CHARGE association (coloboma of the eyes; heart disease; atresia of the choanae; retarded growth and development; genital hypoplasia/genitourinary anomalies; ear anomalies and/or hearing loss) was first described in 1979 by Hall, and among its main features is hearing loss. This study presents a case aiming to establish relationships between performance on Infant Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) and Meaningful Use of Speech Scales (MUSS) tests and the analysis of hearing and language categories of a patient diagnosed with CHARGE syndrome, before and after cochlear implant (CI) surgery.

Case Report A 7-year-old girl was diagnosed with CHARGE. She had severe sensorineural hearing loss and was a prelingual unilateral CI user. We analyzed data from the patient's medical records regarding therapies and video recordings.

Results The patient showed positive results in all evaluations after CI. IT-MAIS rose from 5 to 90% following the use of CI. MUSS also rose, from 75 to 72.5%, after use of CI. Classification of Auditory Skills changed from category 1 before use of CI to category 6 after use of CI. Classification of Language Skills changed from category 1 before use of CI to category 3 after use of CI. The CI is an aid but there are many factors in the therapeutic process, and great heterogeneity in individuals diagnosed with CHARGE should be investigated.

Conclusion The development of listening and language skills after CI use was demonstrated by IT-MAIS and MUSS tests, and categorization of speech and hearing in this child with a diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome shows that CI can be an effective technological resource to provide information on hearing as one source for language construction.

 
  • References

  • 1 Pagon RA, Graham Jr JM, Zonana J, Yong SL. Coloboma, congenital heart disease, and choanal atresia with multiple anomalies: CHARGE association. J Pediatr 1981; 99: 223-227
  • 2 Fortunato CAU. RDLS: Uma opção para analisar a linguagem de crianças surdas usuárias de implante coclear [dissertation]. São Carlos, Brazil: Universidade Federal de São Carlos; 2003: 109
  • 3 Verdu ACMA. Funções simbólicas em pessoas submetidas ao implante coclear: uma análise experimental do ouvir [dissertation]. São Carlos, Brazil: Universidade Federal de São Carlos; 2004: 214
  • 4 Costa OA, Bevilacqua MC, Amantini RCB. Considerações sobre o implante coclear em crianças. In: Bevilacqua MC, Moret ALM, , eds. Deficiência Auditiva: Conversando com familiares e profissionais de saúde. 1st ed. São José dos Campos, Brazil: Pulso; 2005: 123-137
  • 5 Wright CG, Brown OE, Meyerhoff WL, Rutledge JC. Auditory and temporal bone abnormalities in CHARGE association. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986; 95 (5 Pt 1) 480-486
  • 6 Roberts C, Hindley P. The assessment and treatment of deaf children with psychiatric disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999; 40: 151-167
  • 7 Castiquini EAT, Bevilacqua MC. Escala de integração auditiva significativa: procedimento adaptado para a avaliação da percepção da fala. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2000; 6: 51-60
  • 8 Nascimento LT, Bevilacqua MC. Uma proposta de avaliação da linguagem oral [master's thesis]. Bauru, Brazil: Universidade de São Paulo; 1997
  • 9 Bauer PW, Wippold II FJ, Goldin J, Lusk RP. Cochlear implantation in children with CHARGE association. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 1013-1017
  • 10 Lanson BG, Green JE, Roland Jr JT, Lalwani AK, Waltzman SB. Cochlear implantation in Children with CHARGE syndrome: therapeutic decisions and outcomes. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 1260-1266
  • 11 Southwell KE, Bird PA, Murray DP. Cochlear Implantation in children with CHARGE syndrome. Cochlear Implants Int 2010; 11: 170-183 ; erratum in: Cochlear Implants Int 2010;11:241
  • 12 Meinzen-Derr J, Wiley S, Grether S, Choo DI. Children with cochlear implants and developmental disabilities: a language skills study with developmentally matched hearing peers. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32: 757-767
  • 13 Geers AE. Techniques for assessing auditory speech perception and lip reading enhancement in young deaf children. The Volta Review 1994; 96: 85-96
  • 14 Bevilacqua MC, Delgado EMC, Moret ALM. Estudos de casos clínicos de crianças do Centro Educacional do Deficiente Auditivo (CEDAU), do Hospital de Pesquisa e Reabilitação de Lesões Lábio-Palatais—USP. In: Costa OA, Bevilacqua MC, , eds. XI Encontro Internacional de Audiologia. Anais. 1996 Mar 30 to April 2; Bauru, Brasil; 187
  • 15 Bevilacqua MC, Formigoni GMP. Audiologia Educacional: Uma opção terapêutica para a criança deficiente auditiva. 3th ed. Barueri, Brazil: Pró-Fono; 2003
  • 16 Wiley S, , Meinzen-Derr, Choo D. Additional disabilities and communication mode in a pediatric cochlear implant population. Int Congr Ser 2004; 1273: 273-276
  • 17 Ciccone M. Comunicação Total: Introdução, estratégia, a pessoa surda. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Cultura Médica; 1990