Neurodynamische Tests unter die Lupe genommen^[1]

Zusammenfassung

Im Rahmen der Manuellen Therapie dienen neurodynamische Tests dazu, die Beteiligung des Nervensystems in Form einer eingeschränkten Mobilität zu beurteilen. Dabei wird die Testreaktion anhand von Symptomantwort, Bewegungsausmaß und Widerstand sowie dem Vergleich mit der Gegenseite und die Reaktion auf sensibilisierende Bewegungen bewertet. Eine adäquate Interpretation erfordert die Kenntnis der jeweiligen neurophysiologischen und biomechanischen Prozesse.

Das Ziel des Artikels besteht darin, einen aktuellen Überblick über diese Vorgänge zu schaffen, die Lücke zur klinischen Anwendung zu schließen und die Ergebnisse auf wissenschaftlicher Basis interpretierbar zu machen.

Abstract

Within the scope of manual therapy neurodynamic tests serve to evaluate the nervous system’s involvement in relation to limited mobility. For this purpose the patient’s reaction to the test is assessed for symptom response, range of motion and resistance and is compared to the opposite site and to the reaction to sensitising movements. An adequate interpretation requires knowledge about the respective neurophysiological and biomechanical processes.

The aim of this article is to review these processes, to bridge the gap to clinical application and to help to interpret the results on a scientific basis.

Schlüsselwörter

neurodynamische Tests - Muskelaktivität - Neurodynamik - Neurophysiologie

Keywords

neurodynamic tests - muscular activity - neurodynamics - neurophysiology

Anmerkung

¹ Die Arbeit wurde im Rahmen der OMT-Weiterbildung des DVMT erstellt.

• Literatur

• 1 Balster SM, Jull GA. Upper trapezius muscle activity during the brachial plexus tension test in asymptomatic subjects. Manual Therapy 1997; 2: 144-149
• 2 Boyd BS, Wanek L, Gray AT et al. Mechanosensitivity of the lower extremity nervous system during straight-leg raise neurodynamic testing in healthy individuals. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2009; 39: 780-790
• 3 Butler D. Management of peripheral neuropathic pain: Integrating neurobiology, neurodynamics, and clinical evidence. Physical Therapy in Sport 2006; 7: 36-49
• 4 Butler DS, Rolf G, Jones MA. Mobilisation des Nervensystems (Rehabilitation und Prävention). Heidelberg: Springer; 2004
• 5 Crombie IK. The pocket guide to critical appraisal. London: BMJ Books; 1996
• 6 Gilbert KK, Brismée J, Collins D et al. Young Investigator Award Winner: Lumbosacral Nerve Root Displacement and Strain: Part 1. A Novel Measurement Technique During Straight Leg Raise in unembalmed cadavers. Spine 2007;
• 7 Hall T, Zusman M. Adverse mechanical tension in the nervous system? Analysis of straight leg raise. Manual Therapy 1998; 3: 140-146
• 8 Van der Heide B, Allison GT, Zusman M. Pain and muscular responses to a neural tissue provocation test in the upper limb. Manual Therapy 2001; 6: 154-162
• 9 Hunt DG, Zuberbier OA, Kozlowski AJ et al. Reliability of the lumbar flexion, lumbar extension, and passive straight leg raise test in normal populations embedded within a complete physical examination. Spine 2001; 26: 2714-2718
• 10 Jaberzadeh S, Scutter S, Nazeran H et al. Mechanosensitivity of the median nerve and mechanically produced motor responses during Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1. Physiotherapy 2005; 91: 94-100
• 11 Kleinrensink GJ, Stoeckart R, Mulder PG et al. Upper limb tension tests as tools in the diagnosis of nerve and plexus lesions. Anatomical and biomechanical aspects. Clinical Biomechanics 2000; 15: 9-14
• 12 Kobayashi S, Shizu N, Suzuki Y et al. Changes in nerve root motion and intraradicular blood flow during an intraoperative straight-leg-raising test. Spine 2003; 28: 1427-1434
• 13 Lewis J, Ramot R, Green A. Changes in Mechanical Tension in the Median Nerve: Possible implications for the upper limb tension test. Physiotherapy 1998; 84: 254-261
• 14 Oliver GS, Rushton A. A study to explore the reliability and precision of intra and inter-rater measures of ULNT1 on an asymptomatic population. Manual Therapy 2011; 16: 203-206
• 15 Philip K, Lew P, Matyas TA. The inter-therapist reliability of the slump test. The Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 1989; 35: 89-94
• 16 Schmid AB, Coppieters MW. The double crush syndrome revisited – A Delphi study to reveal current expert views on mechanisms underlying dual nerve disorders. Manual Therapy 2011; 16: 557-562
• 17 Trainor K, Pinnington MA. Reliability and diagnostic validity of the slump knee bend neurodynamic test for upper/mid lumbar nerve root compression: a pilot study. Physiotherapy 2011; 97: 59-64
• 18 Upton AR, McComas AJ. The double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. Lancet 1973; 2: 359-362
• 19 Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA. The Delphi List: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998; 51: 1235-1241
• 20 Walsh M. Upper Limb Neural Tension Testing and Mobilization. Fact, Fiction, and a Practical Approach. Journal of Hand Therapy 2005; 18: 241-258