Download PDF
Rofo 2014; 186(2): 130-135
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350298
Mamma
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Before and After Contrast Enhancement

Diffusiongewichtete MR-Bildgebung von benignen und malignen Brustläsionen vor und nach Kontrastmittelgabe
R. Janka
1   Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen
,
M. Hammon
1   Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen
,
C. Geppert
2   Healthcare Sector, Siemens AG, Erlangen
,
A. Nothhelfer
1   Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen
,
M. Uder
1   Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen
,
E. Wenkel
1   Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

26 February 2013

25 June 2013

Publication Date:
08 August 2013 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: Many publications describe the use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in breast MRI. This article addresses the question of when to apply the DWI sequence in the course of the scan protocol. The effect of T1-shortening contrast media (CM) on the ADC values of breast lesions is investigated.

Materials and Methods: Data were acquired on a 1.5 T scanner. 60 patients with 79 lesions (20 benign, 59 malignant) were included. The DWI sequence (4 mm slice thickness, b-values: 50, 400, 800) was applied before and after CM administration. Before calculating the ADC map, the b50, b400 and b800 series were analyzed concerning lesion displacement. ADC values before and after CM application were compared.

Results: The mean lesion size was 1.5 ± 0.8 cm. On the basis of the b50 and b400 measurements, the mean ADC value of benign lesions was 1.89 ± 0.30 × 10-3 mm2/s before and 1.85 ± 0.28 ×10-3 mm2/s after CM administration. The consecutive values for two pure mucinous carcinomas were 1.88 × 10-3 mm2/s and 1.81 × 103 mm2/s and for the remaining malignant lesions 1.00 ± 0.18 × 10-3 mm2/s and 0.88 ± 0.21 × 10-3 mm2. On the basis of the b50, b400 and b800 measurements, the mean ADC value of benign lesions was 1.99 ± 0.37 × 10-3 mm2/s before and 1.97 ± 0.30 × 10-3 mm2/s after CM application, whereas the mean ADC value of the malignant lesions was 0.90 ± 0.14 × 10-3 mm2/s before and 0.80 ± 0.14 × 10-3 mm2/s after CM application. While there was no significant change for benign lesions, the ADC value decrease in post-contrast malignant lesions was highly significant.

Conclusion: DWI after CM is possible and even leads to slightly better lesion discrimination between benign and malignant. However, further studies need to be performed to verify this.

Citation Format:

• Janka R, Hammon M, Geppert C et al. Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Before and After Contrast Enhancement. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2014; 186: 130 – 135

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: In vielen Publikationen werden diffusionsgewichtete Sequenzen für die MRT der Brust beschrieben. In dieser Arbeit soll die Frage beantwortet werden, wann die diffusionsgewichtete Sequenz im Scanprotokoll gemessen werden soll, wobei ein Effekt von T1-Zeit verkürzendem Kontrastmittel (KM) auf den ADC-Wert von Brustläsionen untersucht wird.

Material und Methoden: Die Untersuchungen wurden an einem 1,5 T-MRT durchgeführt. Eingeschlossen wurden 60 Patientinnen mit 79 Brustläsionen (20 benigne, 59 maligne). Die diffusionsgewichtete Sequenz (4 mm Schichtdicke, b-Werte: 50, 400 und 800) wurde vor und nach KM-Gabe gemessen und die entsprechenden ADC-Werte der Läsionen verglichen. Vor der Berechnung der ADC-Werte wurden die Läsionen bezüglich ihrer konstanten Lokalisation in den diffusionsgewichteten Sequenzen analysiert.

Ergebnisse: Die mittlere Größe der Läsionen war 1,5 ± 0,8 cm. Auf der Basis der b50- und b400- Messung betrug der durchschnittliche ADC-Wert der benignen Läsionen 1,89 ± 0,30 × 10-3 mm2/s vor und 1,85 ± 0,28 × 10-3 mm2/s nach KM-Gabe. Die entsprechenden Werte für zwei muzinöse Karzinome betrugen 1,88 × 10-3 mm2/s und 1,81 × 103 mm2/s und für die übrigen malignen Läsionen 1,00 ± 0,18 × 10-3 mm2/s und 0,88 ± 0,21 × 10-3 mm2. Auf der Basis der b50-, b400- und b800-Messung betrug der durchschnittliche ADC-Wert der benignen Läsionen 1,99 ± 0,37 × 10-3 mm2/s vor und 1,97 ± 0,30 × 10-3 mm2/s nach KM-Gabe. Der mittlere ADC-Wert der malignen Läsionen betrug 0,90 ± 0,14 × 10-3 mm2/s vor und 0,80 ± 0,14 × 10-3 mm2/s nach KM-Gabe. Während der ADC- Wert der gutartigen Läsionen durch das Kontrastmittel nicht signifikant beinflusst wurde, war er bei den malignen Läsionen nach Kontrastmittelgabe signifikant niedriger.

Schlussfolgerung: Die Messung der diffusionsgewichteten Sequenz ist auch nach KM-Gabe möglich und führt zu einer besseren Differenzierbarkeit von malignen zu benignen Läsionen. Um dieses Ergebnis zu verifizieren sind weitere Studien nötig.

Key words

breast - diffusion-weighted MR imaging - contrast media
 

  • References

  • 1 Benndorf M, Baltzer PA, Vag T et al. Acta Radiol. 2010; 51: 715-721
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mahoney MC, Gatsonis C, Hanna L et al. Radiology. 2012; 264: 51-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bick U, Engelken F, Diederichs G et al. MRI of the Breast as Part of the Assessment in Population-Based Mammography Screening. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Siegmann KC, Moron HU, Baur A et al. Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009; 181: 556-563
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T et al. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions – systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2011; 183: 126-135
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kul S, Cansu A, Alhan E et al. Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 210-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 1664-1673
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH et al. Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2013; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M et al. Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1101-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 16: 172-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rubesova E, Grell AS, De Maertelaer V et al. Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 319-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 693-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wenkel E, Geppert C, Schulz-Wendtland R et al. Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol 2007; 14: 1077-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T et al. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 1157-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Lowry M et al. Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 843-847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yankeelov TE, Lepage M, Chakravarthy A et al. Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tsushima Y, Takahashi-Taketomi A, Endo K. Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 249-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Geppert C, Wenkel E, Bautz W et al. Enhanced lesion discrimination in breast DWI after contrast administration. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM Toronto: 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yuen S, Yamada K, Goto M et al. Microperfusion-induced elevation of ADC is suppressed after contrast in breast carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 1080-1084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yamada K, Kubota H, Kizu O et al. Effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted images: evaluation of normal brain and infarcts. Stroke 2002; 33: 1799-1802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fitzek C, Mentzel HJ, Fitzek S et al. Echoplanar diffusion-weighted MRI with intravenous gadolinium-DTPA. Neuroradiology 2003; 45: 592-597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Firat AK, Sanli B, Karakas HM et al. The effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology 2006; 48: 465-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ramadan S, Mulkern RV. Comment on ADC reductions in postcontrast breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 262 ; author reply 263–264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Woodhams R, Kakita S, Hata H et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 260-266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hatakenaka M, Soeda H, Yabuuchi H et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008; 7: 23-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF et al. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. Am J Roentgenol Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1716-1722
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 644-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Kan S et al. ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005; 4: 35-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Le Bihan D, Poupon C, Amadon A et al. Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 478-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Geppert C, Feiweiher T, Janka R et al. Reduction of image distortions in breast DWI using dynamic field correction: impact on ADC assessment. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of ESMRMB. Leipzig: 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 ACR Practice Guideline for the Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Breast Res. 25 ed. 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K et al. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1307-1318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar