Endoscopy 2013; 45(S 02): E288-E289
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344406
Cases and Techniques Library (CTL)
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopically resected giant esophageal carcinosarcoma

C. Gubler
Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
,
P. Bauerfeind
Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 September 2013 (online)

A 79-year-old man presented with dysphagia evolving over months. Notably, he underwent right upper lung lobe resection in his sixties and has emphysema and coronary heart disease. Gastroscopy showed a large, inhomogeneous tumor in the proximal esophagus, with a diameter exceeding 5 cm ([Fig. 1]), which was judged to be unresectable endoscopically. Biopsies revealed stromal cells without definite malignancy. Surgical resection was refused due to comorbidities and localization of the tumor; therefore an endoscopic approach was again discussed.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Tumor in the proximal esophagus of a 79-year-old man with dysphagia evolving over months.

In the 1990s, experienced endoscopists started to resect early esophageal cancers with encouraging results [1]. The improved endoscopic mucosal resection results brought the gastroenterologists to attempt a decade later complete en bloc resection of larger lesions [2]. Currently endoscopic resection of early esophageal cancer up to stage T1, N0 is established for the primary curative approach [3]. However, our particular case was different. Within the esophageal lumen, the stalk of the tumor was not appraisable. Endoscopic ultrasound was incomplete due to the compressed lumen. To attempt an endoscopic resection, we looped a guidewire around the base to estimate the stalk size under fluoroscopy. Having only about 1 cm tissue in the loop ([Fig. 2]), resection with an electrocautery snare was carried out. The base of the tumor was macroscopically clean ([Fig. 3]). Extraction of the polyp was hampered by the upper esophageal sphincter. The 6.5-cm tumor ([Fig. 4]) was a histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma strictly defined to the mucosa with sarcomatoid differentiation, staged as pT1b, G3. This rare distinct entity with polypoid appearance seems to have a better long-term prognosis than a squamous cell carcinoma [4]. Two years after endoscopic resection, the patient is doing well without signs of local recurrence and is able to feed sufficiently orally.

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Looped snare around the polyp stalk under fluoroscopy.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 The polyp base after resection.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Macroscopic view of the removed tumor.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG