Drug Res (Stuttg) 2013; 63(05): 243-249
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1334922
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bioequivalence Study of 2 Formulations of Film-coated Tablets containing a Fixed Dose Combination of Bisoprolol Fumarate 5 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 6.25 mg in Healthy Subjects

R. R. Tjandrawinata
1   Dexa Laboratories of Biomolecular Sciences (DLBS), Cikarang, Indonesia
,
E. Setiawati
2   PT Equilab International, Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Laboratory, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
D. A. Yunaidi
2   PT Equilab International, Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Laboratory, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
I. D. Santoso
2   PT Equilab International, Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Laboratory, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
A. Setiawati
3   Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Medical Faculty, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
L. W. Susanto
1   Dexa Laboratories of Biomolecular Sciences (DLBS), Cikarang, Indonesia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 22 August 2012

accepted 02 February 2013

Publication Date:
28 March 2013 (online)

Abstract

Background:

The present study was conducted to compare the bioavailability of 2 formulations of fixed-dose combination of bisoprolol fumarate 5 mg and hydrochlorotiazide (HCT) 6.25 mg film-coated tablet (test and reference formulations).

Methods:

This study was a randomized, single-blind, 2-period, 2-sequence cross-over study which included 18 healthy adult male and female subjects under fasting condition. The pharmacokinetic parameters, AUCt, AUCinf, Cmax, tmax, and t½ were determined based on the concentrations of bisoprolol (CAS 66722-44-9) and HCT (CAS 58-93-5), using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometer detector (UPLC-MS/MS). In each of the 2 study periods (with a washout of 1 week) a single dose of test or reference product was administered.

Results:

The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the test drug/reference drug for bisoprolol were 97.22% (93.75–100.83%) for AUCt(0-48), 97.20% (93.97–100.54%) for AUCinf, and 100.36% (93.83–107.34%) for Cmax; while those for HCT were 93.22% (84.72–102.57%), 93.39% (85.43–102.10%) and 99.39% (85.45–115.61%), for AUCt(0–24), AUCinf, and Cmax, respectively. The differences between the test and reference drug products for tmax values of bisoprolol as well as t½ values of both bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide were not statistically significant; yet, the difference was statistically significant for the tmax values of hydrochlorothiazide. There was no adverse event encountered during this bioequivalence test.

Major conclusion:

It was concluded that the 2 formulations of fixed dose combination of bisoprolol fumarate 5 mg and hydrochlorotiazide (HCT) 6.25 mg film-coated tablet (the test and reference products) were bioequivalent.

 
  • References

  • 1 Sica DA. Rationale for fixed-dose combinations in the treatment of hypertension: The cycle repeats. Drugs 2002; 62: 443-462
  • 2 Lancaster SG, Sorkin EM. Bisoprolol: A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris. Drugs 1988; 36: 256-285
  • 3 Electronic package insert of Concor® 5 and Concor® 10 film-coated tablets. Available at URL http://home.intekom.com/pharm/merckp/concor.html Retrieved 2012
  • 4 Sweetman SC. Martindale. The Complete Drug Reference. 36th ed. New York: The Pharmaceutical Press (PhP); 2009: 1234
  • 5 Sweetman SC. Martindale. The Complete Drug Reference. 36th ed. New York: The Pharmaceutical Press (PhP); 2009: 1307-1311
  • 6 Beermann B, Groschinsky-Grind M. Pharmacokinetics of hydrochlorothiazide in man. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1977; 12: 297-303
  • 7 The European Agency for The Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMA), Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) Note for guidance on the investigation of bioavailability and bioequivalence. CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Rev.1. 2010
  • 8 Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Republik Indonesia (BPOM RI) . Pedoman Uji Bioekuivalensi. Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies. Jakarta: BPOM; 2004
  • 9 World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human patients. Amended by the 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland. 2000
  • 10 International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Topic E 6. Harmonised Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Step 5, Consolidated Guideline 1996
  • 11 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Series on Principles of Good Laboratory Practice and Compliance Monitoring. Number 1. OECD Principles on Good Laboratory Practice. ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17. Revised in 1997
  • 12 Diletti E, Hauschke D, Steinijans VW. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1991; 29: 1-8
  • 13 Bhatt J, Subbaiah G, Kambli S et al. A high throughput and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the estimation of bisoprolol in human plasma using multiplexing technique. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2007; 852: 374-381
  • 14 Gabriela P, Corneliu O, Aurel V. Experimental research for determination of bisoprolol fumarate in human plasma samples using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technique. Rom Biotechnol Lett 2010; 15: 5140-5145
  • 15 Ramakrishna NVS, Vishwottam KN, Manoj S et al. Sensitive liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry method for quantification of hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma. Biomed Chromatogr 2005; 19: 751-760
  • 16 Tutunji MF, Ibrahim HM, Khabbas MH et al. Simultaneous determination of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma by HPLC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2009; 877: 1689-1697
  • 17 Xu K, Hui C, Xu R et al. Pharmacokinetics of the combination hydrochlorothiazide and bisoprolol tablet in Chinese healthy young male and female volunteers. Asian Journal of Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics 2008; 8: 131-137