Download PDF
B&G Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport 2013; 29(2): 67-70
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331095
Praxis
Haug Verlag in MVS Medizinverlage Stuttgart GmbH & Co. KG Stuttgart

Objektive Erfassung von physischer Belastung am Arbeitsplatz mittels Akzelerometrie

K Weiß
1   Universität Heidelberg, Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft
,
R Bosch
1   Universität Heidelberg, Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 April 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die objektive Erfassung von körperlicher Arbeitsbelastung ist noch weit weniger verbreitet als die klassischen Methoden wie Fragebögen oder Interviews, obwohl das Voranschreiten der Technik das objektive Messen von physischer Aktivität inzwischen akkurat und unaufdringlich gestattet. Die Möglichkeit, Akzelerometrie im betrieblichen Kontext einzusetzen, sowie der objektive Nachweis hoher Arbeitsbelastung für Mitarbeiter der Fraport AG konnten im Rahmen einer entsprechenden Untersuchung belegt werden.

Summary

Objective measurement of physical stress at the workplace by means of accelerometry

The objective measurement of physical work load is far less common than the traditional methods of data collection such as questionnaires or interviews. This is in spite of the advance in technology which allows accurate and objective measurement of physical activity. This article discusses the possibility of using accelerometry in the workplace environment based on objective demonstration of high workload for employees at Fraport AG.

Stichworte:

Akzelerometrie - Erfassen physischer Alltagsaktivität - objektives Feedback - Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement

Key words:

Accelerometry - measurement of everyday physical activity - objective feedback - health management
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bartosińska M, Ejsmont J. Influence of a physical exertion on the workers’ health state. Advances in Medical Sciences 2006; 51: 349-352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chen KY, Bassett DR. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37 (Suppl. 11) 490-500
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Drenowatz C, Eisenmann JC. Validation of the SenseWear Armband at high intensity exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 883-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ekelund U, Sjostrom M, Yngve A et al. Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Med Sc Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 275-281
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jakicic JM, Marcus M, Gallagher KI et al. Evaluation of the SenseWear Pro Armband to assess energy expenditure during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 897-904
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Janz KF. Physical activity in epidemiology: moving from questionnaire to objective measurement. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40: 191-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Le Grande MR, Elliott PC, Worcester MU et al. An evaluation of self-report physical activity instruments used in studies involving cardiac patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2008; 28: 358-369
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Levine JA, Baukol PA, Westerterp KR. Validation of the Tracmor triaxial accelerometer system for walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33): 1593-1597
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Matthews CE, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW et al. Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 1376-1381
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 McClain JJ, Tudor-Locke C. Objective monitoring of physical activity in children: considerations for instrument selection. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12: 526-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mignault D, St-Onge M, Karelis AD et al. Evaluation of the portable healthwear armband: a device to measure total daily energy expenditure in free-living type 2 diabetic individuals. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 225-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Montoye HJ, Washburn R, Servais S et al. Estimation of energy expenditure by a portable accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 403-407
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Müller C, Winter C, Rosenbaum D. Aktuelle objektive Messverfahren zur Erfassung körperlicher Aktivität im Vergleich zu subjektiven Erhebungsmethoden. Dtsch Z Sportmed 2010; 61: 11-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Sarkin JA et al. Validity, reliability, and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 908-912
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Platte P, Hellhammer J, Zimmer J et al. Grundumsatz und Energieverbrauch im höheren Lebensalter. Z Gerontol Geriatrie 2004; 37: 387-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 197-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wall TD, Michie J, Patterson M et al. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology 2004; 57: 95-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Westerterp KR. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers. Int J Obesity 1999; 23 Suppl 3: 45-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Zoike E, Lemke E, Ließmann J Hrsg. BKK Gesundheitsreport 2008. Seelische Krankheiten prägen das Krankheitsgeschehen. Essen/Selm: Lonnemann; 2009
    Google Scholar