Treatment of Varicose Veins by Transilluminated Powered Phlebectomy Surgery: A 9-Year Experience

Abstract

Transilluminated powered phlebectomy (TIPP) is a minimally invasive technique for varicose vein removal that addresses some limitations of traditional procedures. The study objective was to analyze perioperative and follow-up outcomes after TIPP and present modifications gleaned over 9 years of performing the technique. Four hundred and thirty-one patients who underwent TIPP performed between June 2002 and April 2011 were included in this retrospective review. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic, treatment, and outcome data. The mean procedure time was 20.2 minutes. The majority (50.5%) of cases involved 10 to 20 incisions. No significant varicosities were reported at a follow-up of 12 weeks. Postoperative complications included 2 (0.5%) deep vein thromboses, 8 (1.9%) cellulitis episodes, 16 (3.7%) hemosiderin staining cases, 2 (0.5%) abscesses, and 2 (0.5%) cases of excessive or hypertrophic scarring. All but one patient reported good outcomes and were satisfied with the procedure. With proper training and experience, TIPP with a lower oscillation frequency and secondary tumescence results in good outcome and high patient satisfaction.

Keywords

TriVex - transilluminated powered phlebectomy - powered phlebectomy - varicose veins - venous surgery

• References

• 1 Hirsch SA, Dillavou E. Options in the management of varicose veins, 2008. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2008; 49 (1) 19-26
• 2 Chetter IC, Mylankal KJ, Hughes H, Fitridge R. Randomized clinical trial comparing multiple stab incision phlebectomy and transilluminated powered phlebectomy for varicose veins. Br J Surg 2006; 93 (2) 169-174
• 3 Franz RW, Knapp ED. Transilluminated powered phlebectomy surgery for varicose veins: a review of 339 consecutive patients. Ann Vasc Surg 2009; 23 (3) 303-309
• 4 Aremu MA, Mahendran B, Butcher W , et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial: conventional versus powered phlebectomy. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39 (1) 88-94
• 5 Passman M. Transilluminated powered phlebectomy in the treatment of varicose veins. Vascular 2007; 15 (5) 262-268
• 6 Scavée V, Lesceu O, Theys S, Jamart J, Louagie Y, Schoevaerdts JC. Hook phlebectomy versus transilluminated powered phlebectomy for varicose vein surgery: early results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 25 (5) 473-475
• 7 Akesson H. Transilluminated powered phlebectomy: a clinical report. Phlebology 2008; 23 (6) 295-298
• 8 Arumugasamy M, McGreal G, O'Connor A, Kelly C, Bouchier-Hayes D, Leahy A. The technique of transilluminated powered phlebectomy — a novel, minimally invasive system for varicose vein surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 23 (2) 180-182
• 9 Cheshire N, Elias SM, Keagy B , et al. Powered phlebectomy (TriVex) in treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg 2002; 16 (4) 488-494
• 10 de Zeeuw R, Wittens C, Loots M, Neumann M. Transilluminated powered phlebectomy accomplished by local tumescent anaesthesia in the treatment of tributary varicose veins: preliminary clinical results. Phlebology 2007; 22 (2) 90-94
• 11 Passman MA, Dattilo JB, Guzman RJ, Naslund TC. Combined endovenous ablation and transilluminated powered phlebectomy: is less invasive better?. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2007; 41 (1) 41-47
• 12 Shamiyeh A, Schrenk P, Huber E, Danis J, Wayand WU. Transilluminated powered phlebectomy: advantages and disadvantages of a new technique. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29 (6) 616-619
• 13 Luebke T, Brunkwall J. Meta-analysis of transilluminated powered phlebectomy for superficial varicosities. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2008; 49 (6) 757-764
• 14 Porter JM, Moneta GL. International Consensus Committee on Chronic Venous Disease. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21 (4) 635-645
• 15 Monahan DL. Can phlebectomy be deferred in the treatment of varicose veins?. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42 (6) 1145-1149
• 16 Welch HJ. Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phlebectomy for branch varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44 (3) 601-605