Aktueller Stand der anatomischen Schulterendoprothetik

Zusammenfassung

Die moderne Ära der Schulterendoprothetik resultiert aus der Weiterentwicklung des 1951 von Charles Neer entwickelten Neer-Prothesensystems. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die Entwicklung und die Implantatcharakteristika der Schulterendoprothesen mit ihren Vor- und Nachteilen sowie den Indikationen zur anatomischen Rekonstruktion des Glenohumeralgelenks. Abschließend werden die Langzeitergebnisse in Abhängigkeit der Ätiologie der Omarthrose dargestellt.

Current Status of Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty

The modern era of shoulder arthroplasty has resulted from the further development of the Neer prosthesis system first described by Charles Neer in 1951. The present article provides an overview of the development and implant characteristics of shoulder arthroplasties with their advantages and disadvantages as well as indications for an anatomic reconstruction of the glenohumeral joint. Finally, long-term results in dependency on the aetiology of the osteoarthritis are presented

• Literatur

• 1 Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997; 79: 857-865
• 2 Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL et al. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992; 74: 491-500
• 3 Orr TE, Carter DR. Stress analyses of joint arthroplasty in the proximal humerus. J Orthop Res 1985; 3: 360-371
• 4 Rietveld AB, Daanen HA, Rozing PM et al. The lever arm in glenohumeral abduction after hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1988; 70: 561-565
• 5 Boileau P, Walch G. Normal and pathological Anatomy of the Glenoid: Effects on the Design, Preparation and Fixation of the glenoid Component. In: Walch G, Boileau P, editor Shoulder Arthroplasty. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1999: 27-140
• 6 Neer CS. Rheumatoid Arthritis. In: Neer CS, ed. Shoulder Reconstruction. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990: 212-216
• 7 Pearl ML, Kurutz S, Robertson DD et al. Geometric analysis of selected press fit prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 192-197
• 8 Williams jr. GR, Wong KL, Pepe MD et al. The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translations, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 399-409
• 9 Ballmer FT, Sidles JA, Lippitt SB et al. Humeral head prosthetic arthroplasty: Surgically relevant geometric considerations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1993; 2: 296-304
• 10 Pearl ML, Volk AG. Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5: 320-326
• 11 Jonsson E, Egund N, Kelly I et al. Cup arthroplasty of the rheumatoid shoulder. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57: 542-546
• 12 Copeland SA. Cementless Surface Replacement Arthroplasty for primary Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder. 11 Years Experience. Ann Shoulder Elbow Surg 15th Annual Meeting. New York: 1998
• 13 Levy O, Copeland SA. Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 266-271
• 14 Neer CS, Brown jr. TH, McLaughlin HL. Fracture of the neck of the humerus with dislocation of the head fragment. Am J Surg 1953; 85: 252-258
• 15 Neer 2nd CSI. Glenohumeral Arthroplasty. In: Neer 2nd CSI, ed. Shoulder Reconstruction. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990: 143-272
• 16 Neer 2nd CS. Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999; 81: 295-296
• 17 Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998; 80: 464-473
• 18 Breusch SJ, Aldinger PR, Thomsen M et al. [Anchoring principles in hip endoprostheses. I: Prosthesis stem]. Unfallchirurg 2000; 103: 918-931
• 19 Matsen FA, Rockwood CA, Wirth MA et al. Glenohumeral Arthritis and its Management. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA, editor The Shoulder. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998: 840-964
• 20 Hinrichs F, Boudriot U, Griss P. [10 year results with a cemented fine-grit-blasted titanium-aluminum-vanadium hip endoprosthesis shaft]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2000; 138: 52-56
• 21 Eingartner C, Volkmann R, Winter E et al. Results of a cemented titanium alloy straight femoral shaft prosthesis after 10 years of follow-up. Int Orthop 2001; 25: 81-84
• 22 Sedel L, Nizard RS, Kerboull L et al. Alumina-alumina hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 175-183
• 23 Neuss M, Clemens S, Marx R et al. [Is the implantation of titanium stems in hip prostheses really obsolete?]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005; 143: 337-342
• 24 Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Johnston RC et al. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 71-77
• 25 Cofield RH. Uncemented total shoulder arthroplasty. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 86-93
• 26 Robertson DD, Yuan J, Bigliani LU et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000; 82: 1594-1602
• 27 Matsen 3rd FA, Iannotti JP, Rockwood jr. CA. Humeral fixation by press-fitting of a tapered metaphyseal stem: a prospective radiographic study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003; 85: 304-308
• 28 Peppers TA, Jobe CM, Dai QG et al. Fixation of humeral prostheses and axial micromotion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7: 414-418
• 29 Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Jacob HA et al. Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. An in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004; 86: 575-580
• 30 Poppen NK, Walker PS. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978; 165-170
• 31 Habermeyer P, Schweiberer L. [Corrective interventions subsequent to humeral head fractures]. Orthopade 1992; 21: 148-157
• 32 Boileau P, Walch G, Liotard JP. [Radio-cinematographic study of active elevation of the prosthetic shoulder]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1992; 78: 355-364
• 33 Barrett WP, Franklin JL, Jackins SE et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987; 69: 865-872
• 34 Swieszkowski W, Bednarz P, Prendergast PJ. Contact stresses in the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2003; 217: 49-57
• 35 Flatow EL. Prosthetic design considerations in total shoulder arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty 1995; 6: 233-244
• 36 Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL et al. The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1995; 77: 555-563
• 37 Friedman RJ. Biomechanics and Design of Shoulder Arthroplasties. In: Friedman RJ, editor Arthroplasty of the Shoulder. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 1994: 27-40
• 38 Terrier A, Buchler P, Farron A. Influence of glenohumeral conformity on glenoid stresses after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 515-520
• 39 Anglin C, Wyss UP, Nyffeler RW et al. Loosening performance of cemented glenoid prosthesis design pairs. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001; 16: 144-150
• 40 Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A et al. The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines: results of a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002; 84: 2186-2191
• 41 Diop A, Maurel N, Grimberg J et al. Influence of glenohumeral mismatch on bone strains and implant displacements in implanted glenoids. An in vitro experimental study on cadaveric scapulae. J Biomech 2006; 39: 3026-3035
• 42 Nho SJ, Ala OL, Dodson CC et al. Comparison of conforming and nonconforming retrieved glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 914-920
• 43 Hertel R, Ballmer FT. Observations on retrieved glenoid components. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 361-366
• 44 Collins D, Tencer A, Sidles J et al. Edge displacement and deformation of glenoid components in response to eccentric loading. The effect of preparation of the glenoid bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992; 74: 501-507
• 45 Szabo I, Buscayret F, Edwards TB et al. Radiographic comparison of flat-back and convex-back glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 636-642
• 46 Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Jacob H et al. The Relevance of Orientation of the glenoid Component in total Shoulder Arthroplasty. 8th ICSS. Cape Town, South Africa; 2001
• 47 Spencer jr. EE, Valdevit A, Kambic H et al. The effect of humeral component anteversion on shoulder stability with glenoid component retroversion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005; 87: 808-814
• 48 Iannotti JP, Spencer EE, Winter U et al. Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14 (Suppl. 01) 111S-121S
• 49 Hertel R, Lehmann O. [Glenohumeral joint. Anatomical aspects and implications for prosthesis design]. Orthopade 2001; 30: 363-369
• 50 Oosterom R, Herder JL, van der Helm FC et al. Translational stiffness of the replaced shoulder joint. J Biomech 2003; 36: 1897-1907
• 51 Friedman RJ, Laberge M, Dooley RL et al. Finite element modeling of the glenoid component: Effect of design parameters on stress distribution. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1992; 1: 261-270
• 52 Murphy LA, Prendergast PJ, Resch H. Structural analysis of an offset-keel design glenoid component compared with a center-keel design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 568-579
• 53 Nyffeler RW, Meyer D, Sheikh R et al. The effect of cementing technique on structural fixation of pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 106-111
• 54 Wirth MA, Rockwood jr. CA. Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1996; 78: 603-616
• 55 Giori NJ, Beaupre GS, Carter DR. The influence of fixation peg design on the shear stability of prosthetic implants. J Orthop Res 1990; 8: 892-898
• 56 Jensen KL. The effects of selected classical music on self-disclosure. J Music Ther 2001; 38: 2-27
• 57 Lazarus MD, Jensen KL, Southworth C et al. The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002; 84: 1174-1182
• 58 Gartsman GM, Elkousy HA, Warnock KM et al. Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 252-257
• 59 Stone KD, Grabowski JJ, Cofield RH et al. Stress analyses of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999; 8: 151-158
• 60 Barwood S, Setter KJ, Blaine TA et al. The incidence of early radiolucencies about a pegged glenoid component using cement pressurization. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 703-708
• 61 Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Atkinson TS et al. Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 625-629
• 62 Nyffeler RW, Anglin C, Sheikh R et al. Influence of peg design and cement mantle thickness on pull-out strength of glenoid component pegs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003; 85: 748-752
• 63 Andreykiv A, Prendergast PJ, van Keulen F et al. Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design. J Biomech 2005; 38: 1023-1033
• 64 Gazielly DF. Controversies in Shoulder Arthroplasty. Paris: 2005
• 65 Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S. Recentering the humeral head for glenoid deficiency in total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 457: 124-132
• 66 Pelletier MH, Langdown A, Gillies RM et al. Photoelastic comparison of strains in the underlying glenoid with metal-backed and all-polyethylene implants. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 779-783
• 67 Mullett H, Levy O, Raj D et al. Copeland surface replacement of the shoulder. Results of an hydroxyapatite-coated cementless implant in patients over 80 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007; 89: 1466-1469
• 68 Smith KL, Matsen 3rd FA. Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Current trends. Orthop Clin North [Am] 1998; 29: 491-506
• 69 Cofield RH, Frankle MA, Zuckerman JD. Humeral head replacement for glenohumeral arthritis. Semin Arthroplasty 1995; 6: 214-221
• 70 Levine WN, Djurasovic M, Glasson JM et al. Hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results correlated to degree of glenoid wear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1997; 6: 449-454
• 71 Kempf JF, Gleyze P, Bonnomet F et al. A multicenter study of 210 rotator cuff tears treated by arthroscopic acromioplasty. Arthroscopy 1999; 15: 56-66
• 72 Boyd jr. AD, Thomas WH, Scott RD et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Indications for glenoid resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 329-336
• 73 Boileau P, Walch G, Trojani C et al. Sequelae of Fractures of the proximal Humerus: Results of Shoulder Arthroplasty without greater Tuberosity Osteotomy. In: Walch G, Boileau P, editor Shoulder Arthroplasty. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1998: 359-369
• 74 Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC et al. Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 442: 121-130
• 75 Boileau P, Trojani C, Walch G et al. Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 299-308
• 76 Mansat P, Guity MR, Bellumore Y et al. Shoulder arthroplasty for late sequelae of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 305-312
• 77 Thomas T, Noel E, Goupille P et al. The rheumatoid shoulder: current consensus on diagnosis and treatment. Joint Bone Spine 2006; 73: 139-143
• 78 Schill S, Thabe H, Grifka J. [Differential therapy for the rheumatoid shoulder]. Orthopade 2002; 31: 1132-1144
• 79 Arntz CT, Jackins S, Matsen 3rd FA. Prosthetic replacement of the shoulder for the treatment of defects in the rotator cuff and the surface of the glenohumeral joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993; 75: 485-491
• 80 Postel JM, Allain J, Favard L et al. Osteoarthritis with massive Cuff Tear: Results of an unconstrained Shoulder Arthroplasty. In: Walch G, Boileau P, eds. Shoulder Arthroplasty. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 1999: 271-275
• 81 Williams jr. GR, Rockwood jr. CA. Hemiarthroplasty in rotator cuff-deficient shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5: 362-367
• 82 Goldberg SS, Bell JE, Kim HJ et al. Hemiarthroplasty for the rotator cuff-deficient shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008; 90: 554-559
• 83 Field LD, Dines DM, Zabinski SJ et al. Hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder for rotator cuff arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1997; 6: 18-23
• 84 Sanchez-Sotelo J, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001; 83: 1814-1822
• 85 Jerosch J, Schunck J, Morsy MG. [Shoulder resurfacing in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and remaining subscapularis function]. Z Orthop Unfall 2008; 146: 206-210
• 86 Deshmukh AV, Koris M, Zurakowski D et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 471-479
• 87 Walch G, Boulahia A, Badet R et al. Primary glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: Clinical and radiographic Classification. In: Walch G, Boileau P, editor Shoulder Arthroplasty. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1999: 195-201
• 88 Adams JE, Sperling JW, Hoskin TL et al. Shoulder arthroplasty in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–2000: a population-based study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 50-55
• 89 Adams JE, Sperling JW, Schleck CD et al. Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in Olmsted County, Minnesota: a population-based study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 455: 176-182
• 90 Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M et al. A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005; 87: 1947-1956
• 91 Haines JF, Trail IA, Nuttall D et al. The results of arthroplasty in osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006; 88: 496-501
• 92 Iannotti JP, Norris TR. Influence of preoperative factors on outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003; 85: 251-258
• 93 Tang KL, Li QH, Habermeyer P. [Clinical outcomes of treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with new generation shoulder prosthesis]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2006; 86: 2741-2748
• 94 van de Sande MA, Brand R, Rozing PM. Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty. Scand J Rheumatol 2006; 35: 426-434
• 95 Basso M, Nové-Josserand L. Results of the Arthroplasty for atraumatic avascular Necrosis of the humeral Head. In: Walch G, Boileau P, editor Shoulder Arthroplasty. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1999: 251-257
• 96 Hattrup SJ. Indications, technique, and results of shoulder arthroplasty in osteonecrosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1998; 29: 445-451
• 97 Mansat P, Huser L, Mansat M et al. Shoulder arthroplasty for atraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head: nineteen shoulders followed up for a mean of seven years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 114-120
• 98 Orfaly RM, Rockwood jr. CA, Esenyel CZ et al. Shoulder arthroplasty in cases with avascular necrosis of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16 (Suppl. 03) S27-S32
• 99 Orfaly RM, Rockwood jr. CA, Esenyel CZ et al. A prospective functional outcome study of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003; 12: 214-221
• 100 Parsch D, Lehner B, Loew M. Shoulder arthroplasty in nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003; 12: 226-230
• 101 Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M et al. Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004; 86: 217-219
• 102 Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J et al. Shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral malunions: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11: 122-129
• 103 Walch G, Boileau P, Pozzi I. Glenoid resurfacing in Shoulder Arthroplasty: proʼs and conʼs. In: Walch G, Boileau P, editor Shoulder Arthroplasty. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1999: 177-181
• 104 Koorevaar RC, Merkies ND, de Waal Malefijt MC et al. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. 19 cases reexamined after 1–17 years. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68: 243-245
• 105 Rahme H, Mattsson P, Wikblad L et al. Cement and press-fit humeral stem fixation provides similar results in rheumatoid patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448: 28-32
• 106 Mengshoel AM, Slungaard B. Effects of shoulder arthroplasty and exercise in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2005; 24: 258-265
• 107 Fink B, Singer J, Lamla U et al. Surface replacement of the humeral head in rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 366-373
• 108 Fuerst M, Fink B, Ruther W. The DUROM cup humeral surface replacement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008; 90 (Suppl. 02) 287-298
• 109 Collins DN, Harryman 2nd DT, Wirth MA. Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004; 86: 2489-2496
• 110 Trail IA, Nuttall D. The results of shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002; 84: 1121-1125
• 111 Green A, Norris TR. Shoulder arthroplasty for advanced glenohumeral arthritis after anterior instability repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 539-545
• 112 Matsoukis J, Tabib W, Mandelbaum A et al. [Shoulder arthroplasty for non-operated anterior shoulder instability with secondary osteoarthritis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2003; 89: 7-18
• 113 Matsoukis J, Tabib W, Guiffault P et al. Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a prior anterior shoulder dislocation. Results of a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003; 85: 1417-1424
• 114 Matsoukis J, Tabib W, Guiffault P et al. [Shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis after prior surgery for anterior instability: a report of 27 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2003; 89: 580-592
• 115 Nagels J, Valstar ER, Stokdijk M et al. Patterns of loosening of the glenoid component. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002; 84: 83-87
• 116 Sperling JW, Antuna SA, Sanchez-Sotelo J et al. Shoulder arthroplasty for arthritis after instability surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002; 84: 1775-1781
• 117 Staffee AD, More RW. Hemi-resurfacing arthroplasty of the rheumatoid shoulder. Contemp Orthop 1984; 9: 51-59
• 118 Cruess RL. Osteonecrosis of bone. Current concepts as to etiology and pathogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 208: 30-39
• 119 Moineau G, McClelland WB, Troijani C et al. Prognostic factors and limitations of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of posttraumatic cephalic collapse or necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2012; 94: 2186-2194
• 120 Norris TR, Green A, Mc Guigan FX. Late prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995; 4: 271-280
• 121 Tauber M, Karpik S, Matis N et al. Shoulder arthroplasty for traumatic avascular necrosis: predictors of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 465: 208-214
• 122 Beredjiklian PK, Iannotti JP. Treatment of proximal humerus fracture malunion with prosthetic arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 1998; 47: 135-140
• 123 Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM et al. Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 527-540
• 124 Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P. Sind die Ergebnisse der sekundären Schulter-Frakturprothetik abhängig vom Frakturtyp nach Boileau? Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie 2008, 22. – 25. 10. 2008; Berlin.
• 125 Biehl C, Schill J, Thabe H. Die rekonstruktive Versorgung der Rheumatischen Schulter mit der MVS-Schulterprothese. 47. Jahrestagung der NOV. Leipzig: 1998