OP-Journal 2013; 29(1): 98-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328264
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Revisionseingriffe in der Schulterendoprothetik

Robert Hudek
,
Maik Zitzmann
,
Frank Gohlke
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
08. Mai 2013 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Revisionseingriffe in der Schulterendoprothetik stellen höchste Ansprüche an das gesamte Team bez. Operationsplanung und Durchführung. Aufgrund der häufig komplexen Ausgangslage sind eine ausreichende Analyse der präoperativen Situation und die Auswahl geeigneter Wechselkomponenten essenziell. Dabei ist das gesamte Team einzubeziehen, da Rückzugsoptionen und ein schneller Verfahrenswechsel sichergestellt sein müssen. Die wesentlichen Wechselursachen sind mechanische Komplikationen durch Lockerung, Komponentenversagen oder Fraktur, Infektionen oder die Insuffizienz der Rotatorenmanschette nach der Implantation anatomischer Prothesen. Jedes dieser Versagensmuster verlangt eine spezifische Behandlung und Berücksichtigung unterschiedlicher Faktoren zur Erzielung einer funktionellen Verbesserung. Zur Durchführung muss ein spezielles Instrumentarium zur Verfügung stehen, mit dessen Anwendung das gesamte Team vertraut sein sollte. Infektionen sind durch den teilweisen oder kompletten Wechsel der Komponenten zu beherrschen. Hierbei kann eine antibiotikabeladene Interimsprothese je nach Ausmaß der Infektion notwendig werden.

Revision Operations on Total Shoulder Arthroplasties

The surgical planning and performance of revision operations on total shoulder arthroplasties place the highest demands on the entire team. On account of the often complex starting conditions, an adequate analysis of the preoperative situation and the choice of suitable revision components are mandatory. The entire team must be involved as options for reversal and/or a rapid change in the procedures must be available. The main reasons for a procedural change are mechanical complications due to loosening, component failures or fractures, infections or insufficiency of the rotator cuff after implantation of an anatomic prosthesis. Each of these reasons for failure requires a specific management and consideration of widely varying factors in order to achieve an improvement in function. Special instruments must be available and the entire team should be familiar with their use. Infections should be managed by partial or complete exchange of the components. In such cases an interim prosthesis charged with antibiotics may be necessary depending on the extent of the infection.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Affonso J, Nicholson GP, Frankle MA, Walch G, Gerber C, Garzon-Muvdi J, McFarland EG. Complications of the reverse prosthesis: prevention and treatment. Instr Course Lect 2012; 61: 157-168
  • 2 Alta TD, Veeger HE, Janssen TW, Willems WJ. Are shoulders with a reverse shoulder prosthesis strong enough? A pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 2185-2192
  • 3 Berth A, Pap G. Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis: a comparison of the functional outcome after a minimum of two years follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol 2013; 14: 31-37
  • 4 Betsch BY, Eggli S, Siebenrock KA, Tauber MG, Muhlemann K. Treatment of joint prosthesis infection in accordance with current recommendations improves outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1221-1226
  • 5 Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood jr. CA. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006; 88: 2279-2292
  • 6 Bonnevialle N, Melis B, Neyton L, Favard L, Mole D, Walch G, Boileau P. Aseptic glenoid loosening or failure in total shoulder arthroplasty: revision with glenoid reimplantation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; Oct 30 [Epub ahead]
  • 7 Carroll RM, Izquierdo R, Vazquez M, Blaine TA, Levine WN, Bigliani LU. Conversion of painful hemiarthroplasty to total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 599-603
  • 8 Chin PY, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Schleck C. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 19-22
  • 9 Cofield RH, Edgerton BC. Total shoulder arthroplasty: complications and revision surgery. Instr Course Lect 1990; 39: 449-462
  • 10 De Wilde L, Mombert M, Van Petegem P, Verdonk R. Revision of shoulder replacement with a reversed shoulder prosthesis (Delta III): report of five cases. Acta Orthop Belg 2001; 67: 348-353
  • 11 Gohlke F, Rolf O. [Revision of failed fracture hemiarthroplasties to reverse total shoulder prosthesis through the transhumeral approach: method incorporating a pectoralis-major-pedicled bone window]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19: 185-208
  • 12 Hattrup SJ, Cofield RH, Cha SS. Rotator cuff repair after shoulder replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 78-83
  • 13 Levine WN, Fischer CR, Nguyen D, Flatow EL, Ahmad CS, Bigliani LU. Long-term follow-up of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2012; 94: e164
  • 14 Liem D, Marquardt B, Witt KA, Steinbeck J. [Shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanics and design]. Orthopade 2007; 36: 1027-1036
  • 15 Melis B, Bonnevialle N, Neyton L, Levigne C, Favard L, Walch G, Boileau P. Glenoid loosening and failure in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: is revision with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty a reliable option?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21: 342-349
  • 16 Miller BS, Joseph TA, Noonan TJ, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ. Rupture of the subscapularis tendon after shoulder arthroplasty: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005; 14: 492-496
  • 17 Nielsen PA. Role of reduced sulfur compounds in nutrition of Propionibacterium acnes. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 17: 276-279
  • 18 Petersen SA, Hawkins RJ. Revision of failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1998; 29: 519-533
  • 19 Rasmussen JV, Jakobsen J, Brorson S, Olsen BS. The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry: clinical outcome and short-term survival of 2,137 primary shoulder replacements. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 171-173
  • 20 Rolf O, Stehle J, Gohlke F. [Treatment of septic arthritis of the shoulder and periprosthetic shoulder infections. Special problems in rheumatoid arthritis]. Orthopade 2007; 36: 700-707
  • 21 Scalise JJ, Iannotti JP. Bone grafting severe glenoid defects in revision shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 139-145
  • 22 Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992; 74: 849-863
  • 23 Strauss EJ, Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright T, Zuckerman JD. The glenoid in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 819-833