Endoscopy 2013; 45(05): 377-391
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326487
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

UEG week 2012 Report: Putting endoscopy into perspective

I. S. Papanikolaou
Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine and Research Unit, Attikon University General Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 April 2013 (online)

The 20th United European Gastroenterology Week (UEG week; 20 – 24 October 2012; Amsterdam, The Netherlands) offered, once again, the opportunity for delegates interested in gastrointestinal endoscopy to update their knowledge as colleagues from all over the world shared their experiences. Various interesting studies on endoscopic topics were presented, allowing participants to become better acquainted with recent advancements and research trends in gastrointestinal endoscopy. This report focuses on oral presentations and selected poster presentations and aims to review them in the light of recent literature.

 
  • References

  • 1 Fovos A, Jarral O, Panagiotopoulos N et al. Does endoscopic treatment for early oesophageal cancers give equivalent oncological outcomes as compared with oesophagectomy? Best evidence topic (BET). Int J Surg 2012; 10: 415-420
  • 2 Inoue H, Ikeda H, Hosoya T et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and beyond: full-layer resection for gastric cancer with nonexposure technique (CLEAN-NET). Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2012; 21: 129-140
  • 3 Deprez PH. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of upper gastrointestinal tumors. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 966-970
  • 4 Baptista V, Singh A, Wassef W. Early gastric cancer: an update on endoscopic management. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2012; 28: 629-635
  • 5 Okada K, Tsuchida T, Ishiyama A et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 556-564
  • 6 Repici A, Hassan C, De Paula Pessoa D et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 137-150
  • 7 Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 1042-1049
  • 8 Uedo N, Jung HY, Fujishiro M et al. Current situation of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial neoplasms in the upper digestive tract in East Asian countries: a questionnaire survey. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 124-128
  • 9 Saito Y, Kawano H, Takeuchi Y et al. Current status of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and other Asian countries: progressing towards technical standardization. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 67-72
  • 10 Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pimentel-Nunes P, Afonso M et al. A European case series of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric superficial lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 350-355
  • 11 Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 660-667
  • 12 Farhat S, Chaussade S, Ponchon T et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 664-670
  • 13 Coda S, Trentino P, Antonellis F et al. A Western single-center experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancers. Gastric Cancer 2010; 13: 258-263
  • 14 Papanikolaou IS, Rösch T. UEGW 2011 report: putting endoscopy into perspective. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 512-526
  • 15 Marc G, Lopes CV. Endoscopic resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 4600-4606
  • 16 Larghi A, Waxman I. State of the art on endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2007; 17: 441-469
  • 17 Schumacher B, Charton JP, Nordmann T et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric neoplasia with a water jet-assisted knife: a Western, single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1166-1174
  • 18 Neuhaus H, Schumacher B, Nordmann T et al. A randomized trial of conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (CESD) versus water-jet assisted ESD (WESD) of early gastric cancer (EGJ). Endoscopy 2012; 44: A7
  • 19 Kanzaki H, Ishihara R, Ohta T et al. Prospective, randomized study of blade knife versus flush knife endoscopic submucosal dissection for oesophageal cancer performed by endoscopists in the training process. Gut 2012; 61: A7
  • 20 Yamamoto K, Hayashi S, Ichiba M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial colorectal neoplasms using endoclips to assist in mucosal flap formation (novel technique: “clip flap method”). Endoscopy 2012; 44: A33
  • 21 Yasuda M, Fujiwara K, Ando M et al. ESD using clips and snares as lifting method (CSL-ESD) for early gastric cancer is convenient, safe, low-cost and clinically useful. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A122
  • 22 Kato M, Nakajima K, Yamada T et al. Next generation esophageal ESD under steady pressure automatically controlled endoscopy (SPACE): a feasibility study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A25
  • 23 Chiu PW, Teoh AY, To KF et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) compared with gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3584-3591
  • 24 Okada K, Fujisaki J, Yoshida T et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 122-127
  • 25 Nishide N, Ono H, Kakushima N et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in remnant stomach or gastric tube. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 577-583
  • 26 Lee JH, Hong SJ, Jang JY et al. Outcome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in Korea. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 3591-3595
  • 27 Kato M, Nishida T, Yamamoto K et al. Scheduled endoscopic surveillance controls secondary cancer after curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: a multicentre retrospective cohort study by Osaka University ESD study group. Gut 21. 08. 2012 [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301647.
  • 28 Tanaka E, Yoshio T, Hibino K et al. Synchronous and metachronous gastric cancers and other organ cancers after ESD for early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A8
  • 29 Ochiai Y, Nonaka K, Togawa O et al. Evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasm in 352 lesions in 284 patients. Gut 2012; 61: A42
  • 30 Ishii E, Ito H, Fujii H. Short and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for patients with early gastric cancer histologically diagnosed as contraindication for ESD. Gut 2012; 61: A42
  • 31 Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y et al. Multicenter prospective study on local recurrence after endoscopic resection of large colorectal neoplasia conducted by the colorectal endoscopic resection standardization implementation working group of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A70
  • 32 Sasajima K, Chinzei R, Takahashi M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasm. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A70
  • 33 Iacopini F, Bella A, Costamagna G et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): stepwise training in the rectum and colon with learning curves. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A69
  • 34 Nakajima T, Sakamoto T, Matsuda T. Outcomes and chronological trends following endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasia greater than 50 mm in size. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A69
  • 35 Kawata N, Takizawa K, Kakushima N et al. Treatment outcomes of early gastric cancer with inadvertent intralesional incision during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A8
  • 36 Higashiyama M, Oka S, Tanaka S et al. Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasm. Dig Endosc 2011; 23: 290-295
  • 37 Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG et al. Aspirin use and bleeding risk after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasms. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 114-121
  • 38 Nakamura K, Suzuki H, Oda I et al. Chronological trend in intraoperative and delayed bleeding associated with gastric ESD. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A8
  • 39 Terasaki M, Tanaka S, Oka S et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 734-740
  • 40 Tsuji Y, Ohata K, Sekiguchi M et al. An effective training system for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasm. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 1033-1038
  • 41 Iizuka H, Kakizaki S, Sohara N et al. Stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers and adenomas. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 282-288
  • 42 Kakushima N, Ono H, Tanaka M et al. Stenosis and motility disturbance after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the stomach. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A8
  • 43 Sato H, Inoue H, Igarashi K et al. Efficacy of early oral steroid therapy in preventing strictures after complete circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal neoplasia. Gut 2012; 61: A71
  • 44 Kanai N, Yamato M, Ohki T et al. Transplantation of fabricated allogeneic epidermal cell sheets using a novel delivery device after ESD in a porcine model. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A87
  • 45 Urban O, Kijonkova B, Kajzrlikova IM et al. Local residual neoplasia after endoscopic treatment of laterally spreading tumors during 15 months of follow-up. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A70
  • 46 Omori T, Yokoyama T, Nakamura R et al. Long-term outcome of the superficial squamous cell carcinoma in the head & neck region (SHESCC) after endoscopic resection (ER). Gut 2012; 61: A71
  • 47 Ivekovic H, Mourin A, Piessevaux H et al. Endoscopic resection as a curative option for esophageal carcinoma with superficial submucosal involvement. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A100
  • 48 Miyachi H, Kudo S-E, Hamatani S et al. Management strategies of submucosal-invasive colorectal carcinomas after endoscopic treatment and the significance of the state of muscularis mucosae (MM grade) as a brand-new risk factor for nodal metastasis. Gut 2012; 61: A95
  • 49 Kim E, Ivekovic H, Shaza L et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for large superficial duodenal neoplasms. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A127
  • 50 Inoue H, Tianle KM, Ikeda H et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: technique, indication, and outcomes. Thorac Surg Clin 2011; 21: 519-525
  • 51 Familiari P, Marchese M, Boskoski I et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for oesophageal achalasia. Preliminary results on 22 patients. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A10
  • 52 Von Renteln D, Fuchs KH, Fockens P et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: prospective international multi center study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A11
  • 53 Maselli R, Inoue H, Ikeda H et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) as a revisional procedure after failed heller myotomy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A11
  • 54 Hu J-W, Zhou P-H, Li Q-L et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia of sigmoid type: a prospective single center study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A11
  • 55 Chen W-F, Zhou P-H, Li Q-L et al. Clinical impact of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia of pediatric patients: a prospective single center study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A11
  • 56 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 1171−1178
  • 57 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Guenther T et al. What is the most reliable imaging modality for small colonic polyp characterization? Study of white-light, autofluorescence, and narrow-band imaging. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 94-99
  • 58 Takeuchi Y, Hanafusa M, Kanzaki H et al. A proposal for a “resect and discard” strategy with optical diagnosis using magnifying narrow-band imaging: a pilot study of diagnostic accuracy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A3
  • 59 Repuci A, Hassan C, Radaelli F et al. Accuracy of in vivo optical diagnosis of colonpolyp histology by narrow-band imaging: the sharp study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A33
  • 60 Bisschops R, Bessissow T, Baert F et al. Chromo-endoscopy versus narrow band imaging in ulcerative colitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A26
  • 61 Chung SJ, Kim D. Efficacy of narrow band imaging and Fuji intelligent color enhancement in comparison with conventional colonoscopy on colon cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial in 1559 health check-up Koreans. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A83
  • 62 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 2008; 57: 59-64
  • 63 Aminalai A, Rösch T, Aschenbeck J et al. Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5). Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2383-2388
  • 64 Kawada KK. Endoscopic diagnosis of early oral cavity and laryngopharyngeal carcinoma using a transnasal ultrathin endoscope with FICE system. Gut 2012; 61: A39
  • 65 Yagi N, Dohi O, Okayama T et al. Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy with blue laser imaging in the diagnosis of early gastric cancers. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A88
  • 66 Osawa H, Miura Y, Ino Y et al. Blue laser imaging as a new endoscopic system can produce an excellent image of detailed microstructure and microvasculare in superficial gastroduodenal neoplasm. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A240
  • 67 Basford PJ, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Bhandari P. The learning curve for in-vivo characterisation of small colonic polyps: number needed to train (NNT) is 200 polyps. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A241
  • 68 Basford PJ, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Bhandari P. High definition white light endoscopy & iScan for in-vivo characterisation of small colonic polyps: no need to push the button. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A241
  • 69 Kawai T, Fukuzawa M, Fukuzawa MM. New device of image enhancing techniques in UGI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A40
  • 70 Bisschops R, Tejpar S, Willekens H et al. Virtual chromo-endoscopy in HNPCC: a prospective randomized controlled back-to-back trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A85
  • 71 Pohl H, Koch M, Khalifa A et al. Evaluation of endocytoscopy in the surveillance of patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 492-496
  • 72 Matsudaira S, Kudo S-E, Miyachi H et al. Diagnostic characteristics of depressed-type colorectal cancers with endocytoscopy and magnifying endoscopy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A4
  • 73 Bessho R, Kanai T, Hosoe N et al. Correlation between endocytoscopy and conventional histopathology in microstructural features of ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 1197-1202
  • 74 Matsushima K, Isomoto H, Uehara R et al. Towards better evaluation of ulcerative colitis using magnified endoscopy and endocytoscopy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A26
  • 75 Mori Y, Kudo S-E, Wakamura K et al. Endocytoscopy can provide additional diagnostic value to magnifying chromoendoscopy for predicting a massively invasive colorectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A124
  • 76 Realdon S, Dassie E, Dall’Olmo L et al. HER2 overexpression is a suitable marker for “in vivo” targeted confocal endoscopy in a rat model of Barrett’s esophagus carcinogenesis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A13
  • 77 Baumgart DC. Endoscopic surveillance in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: who needs what and when?. Dig Dis 2011; 29: 32-35
  • 78 Hundorfean G, Chiriac MT, Hartmann A et al. Assessment of the process of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis upon anti-TNF therapy by using confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A27
  • 79 Atreya R, Neumann H, Neufert C et al. In vivo molecular endomicroscopy predicts the therapeutic response to anti-TNF treatment in Crohn’s disease patients during a prospective clinical phase 1 study. Gut 2012; 61: A72
  • 80 Krauss E, Agaimy A, Douplik A et al. Normalized autofluorescence imaging diagnostics in upper GI tract: a new method to improve specificity in neoplasia detection. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2012; 5: 956-964
  • 81 Bessissow T, Bisschops R. Advanced endoscopic imaging for dysplasia surveillance in ulcerative colitis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 7: 57-67
  • 82 Boerwinkel D, Holz J, Curvers W et al. Clinical impact of autofluorescence imaging on the endoscopic treatment for early Barrett’s neoplasia: a prospective assessment of 371 patients. Gut 2012; 61: A16
  • 83 Boerwinkel D, Holz J, Aalders M et al. First human feasibility study on third generation autofluorescence endoscopy for the detection of early neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A26
  • 84 Herrero LA, van Vilsteren FG, Pouw RE et al. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation combined with endoscopic resection for early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus longer than 10 cm. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 682-690
  • 85 Greenwald BD, Lightdale CJ, Abrams JA et al. Barrett’s esophagus: endoscopic treatments II. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011; 1232: 156-174
  • 86 Bisschops R, Deprez P, Willekens H et al. Oesophageal radiofrequency ablation: results of a multicenter Belgian registry. Gut 2012; 61: A15
  • 87 Phoa KN, Bergman JJ on behalf of EURO-II study group Radiofrequency ablation combined with endoscopic resection for Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia in 132 patients: results of a prospective European multicenter study (EURO-II). Gut 2012; 61: A16
  • 88 Van Vilsteren FGI, Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw R et al. Prospective multicenter study to identify predictive markers for initial treatment response after circumferential radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia. Gut 2012; 61: A16
  • 89 Alvarez Herrero L, van Vilsteren FG, Visser M et al. Safety of simultaneous use of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation: evaluation of two variants of “single step” treatment in an oesophageal porcine model. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A16
  • 90 Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM et al. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1375-1383
  • 91 Solaymani-Dodaran M, Card T, West J. Cause-specific mortality in Barrett’s oesophagus compared to the general population, a population based cohort study. Gut 2012; 61: A1
  • 92 Targownik LE, Nabalamba A. Trends in management and outcomes of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: 1993–2003. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 1459-1466
  • 93 Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut 2011; 60: 1327-1335
  • 94 Loperfido S, Baldo V, Piovesana E et al. Changing trends in acute upper-GI bleeding: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 212-224
  • 95 Wang YR, Richter JE, Dempsey DT. Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 51-58
  • 96 Monica F, Germana B, Marin R et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding and clinical care in the Veneto network: hospitalization and mortality decreased over years. Gut 2012; 61: A99
  • 97 Malmi H, Kautiainen H, Koskenpato J et al. Survival and mortality associated with peptic ulcer disease in Finland. Gut 2012; 61: A99
  • 98 Ahmed A, Blatchford O, Morris AJ et al. Upper GI-bleeding in Scotland 2000–2010: improving outcome but a significant weekend effect. Gut 2012; 61: A99
  • 99 Crooks CJ, Card TR, West J et al. Causes of death in a population based upper gastrointestinal bleed cohort. Gut 2012; 61: A100
  • 100 De Groot NL, Siersema PD, van Oijen MG et al. An update of the predictive value of the Forrest classification for rebleeding of peptic ulcer bleeds; results of a prospective cohort study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A40
  • 101 Holster IL, Valkhoff VE, Kuipers EJ et al. Increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with use of new oral anticoagulants − a meta-analysis. Gut 2012; 61: A91
  • 102 Leblanc S, Vienne A, Coriat R et al. Hemospray™ powder for the control of upper gastrointestinal bleeding following therapeutic endoscopy: preliminary experience in 12 patients. Gut 2012; 61: A425
  • 103 Pasha SF, Leighton JA. Endoscopic techniques for small bowel imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2013; 51: 177-187
  • 104 Lenz P, Domagk D. Double- vs. single-balloon vs. spiral enteroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 26: 303-313
  • 105 Matsuda T, Chounan A, Nihei K et al. Efficacy and safety of emergency balloon assisted endoscopy examination for patients with overt-ongoing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 2012; 61: A100
  • 106 Domagk D, Mensink P, Aktas H et al. Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 472-476
  • 107 Manno M, Barbera C, Bertani H et al. Double- vs. single-balloon enteroscopy: and the winner is…. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 883
  • 108 Yamada A, Watabe H, Takano N et al. A randomized controlled trial of single versus double balloon endoscopy in patients with difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A133
  • 109 Despott EJ, Murino A, Bourikas L et al. Manual spiral enteroscopy vs. double-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective, back-to-back, comparative study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A41
  • 110 Rösch T. Progress in endoscopy: areas of current interest and topics to watch out for. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 1148-1157
  • 111 Moneghini D, Missale G, Airo P et al. Small bowel capsule endoscopy findings in common variable immunodeficiency disorder: case series and proposal of an endoscopic lesions classification. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A41
  • 112 Maarschalk-Ellerbroek LJ, Oldenburg B, Mombers IM et al. Outcome of screening endoscopy in common variable immunodeficiency disorder and X-linked agammaglobulinemia. Endoscopy 16. 01. 2013 [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326078.
  • 113 Moneghini D, Missale G, Minelli L et al. Natural history of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and negative capsule endoscopy: a long term follow up study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A59
  • 114 Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N et al. Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 541-545
  • 115 Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N et al. Blinded nonrandomized comparative study of gastric examination with a magnetically guided capsule endoscope and standard videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 373-381
  • 116 Denzer UW, Rösch T, Hotayt B et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic gastric capsule examination (MGCE) in patients with indications for upper GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A60
  • 117 Ohta H, Katsuki S, Fujita T et al. A more patient friendly approach to a total gastrointestinal screening by single capsule endoscopy with navigation; using remote desktop control technology. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A60
  • 118 Spada C, Hassan C, Galmiche JP et al. Colon capsule endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 527-536
  • 119 Arezzo A, Menciassi A, Valdastri P et al. Experimental assessment of a novel robotically driven endoscopic capsule for colonoscopy: a comparative study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A60
  • 120 Van Der Schaar P, Broekhuizen-de Gast H, Nijsen J et al. Remotely controlled, small intestinal release of 99MTc-pertechnetate using an ingestible electronic device: The Intellicap. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A60
  • 121 Gellad ZF, Provenzale D. Colorectal cancer: national and international perspective on the burden of disease and public health impact. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2177-2190
  • 122 Inadomi JM, Vijan S, Janz NK et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 575-582
  • 123 Kaminski MF, Bretthauer M, Zauber AG et al. The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 695-702
  • 124 Ben Larbi I, van Turenhout S, Oort F et al. Fecal immunochemical test results in different stages of colorectal cancer: a colonoscopy controlled study. Gut 2012; 61: A74
  • 125 Parente F, Boemo C, Ardizzoia A et al. Outcomes and cost evaluation of the first two rounds of a colorectal cancer screening program based on immunochemical fecal occult blood test in northern Italy. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 27-34
  • 126 Kolligs FT, Nagel D, Melzer A et al. MR colonography, colonoscopy, and FOBT to screen for colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic adults: a comparative study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A84
  • 127 Bevan R, Lee TJW, Atkin WS et al. Non-neoplastic diagnoses within the NHS bowel cancer screening programme. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A84
  • 128 Kolligs FT, Crispin A, Munte A et al. Prevalence of advanced adenoma and cancer in surveillance colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A84
  • 129 Lee YJ, Kim ES, Park KS et al. Predictors of discrepancy between forceps biopsy and resection specimen of colorectal neoplasia; focus on surface appearance. Gut 2012; 61: A85
  • 130 Repici A, Fini L, De Cassan C et al. Polyp detection rate after single oral dose of methylene blue MMX® modified release tablets administered to subjects undergoing out patients colonoscopy. Gut 2012; 61: A85
  • 131 Dafnis G, Ekbom A, Pahlman L et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy within a defined population in Sweden. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 302-309
  • 132 Stevens S, Sergot L, Mawdsley J et al. Hospital attendances after outpatient colonoscopy: the hidden healthcare burden?. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A84
  • 133 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Blero D et al. Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 277-298
  • 134 Landi R, Tringali A, Boskoski I et al. Endotherapy of post-cholecystectomy biliary strictures with multiple plastic stents: 20 year experience on 183 patients. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A96
  • 135 Boskoski I, Tringali A, Familiari P et al. Biliary anastomotic strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation: endotherapy with multiple plastic stents, long term follow-up. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A5
  • 136 Kaffes A, Griffin S, Vaughan R et al. Metal stent versus plastic stent for post liver transplant anastomotic biliary strictures. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A97
  • 137 Rieder E, Dunst CM, Martinec DV et al. Endoscopic suture fixation of gastrointestinal stents: proof of biomechanical principles and early clinical experience. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 1121-1126
  • 138 Mangiavillano B, Manes G, Viaggi P et al. Covered removable self expandable metal stents with the new “anchoring-flap system” for the treatment of benign biliary disease reduce distal migration. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A5
  • 139 Frozanpor F, Soderlund C, Linder S et al. Partially covered nitinol versus partially covered steel self-expandable metal stent in the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary obstruction: preliminary results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A14
  • 140 Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1414-1422
  • 141 Moretó M, Zaballa M, Casado I et al. Transdermal glyceryl trinitrate for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 1-7
  • 142 Nøjgaard C, Hornum M, Elkjaer M et al. Does glyceryl nitrate prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: e31-37
  • 143 Sotoudehmanesh R, Farsinejad M, Babaei M et al. Role of combination of NSAID and nitrates for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis; a randomized controlled study: an open-labeled study. Gut 2012; 61: A62
  • 144 Koornstra JJ, Fry L, Mönkemüller K. ERCP with the balloon-assisted enteroscopy technique: a systematic review. Dig Dis 2008; 26: 324-329
  • 145 Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A et al. Long- and short-type double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted therapeutic ERCP for intact papilla in patients with a Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 713-721
  • 146 Shimatani M, Takaoka M, Miyoshi H et al. Evaluation for ERCP using a short double balloon enteroscope (DB-ERCP) in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a large case series. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A14
  • 147 Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 165-173
  • 148 Konstantinidis K, Tribonias G, Voudoukis E et al. A prospective randomized comparison of 60- seconds versus 30-seconds endoscopic balloon dilation after endoscopic sphincterotomy for the management of bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A41
  • 149 Mavrogenis G, Deprez PH, Wallon J et al. Bile duct adenoma causing recurrent cholangitis: diagnosis and management with targeted Spyglass access and radiofrequency ablation. Endoscopy 2012; 44: E290-291
  • 150 Kalaitzakis E, Webster GJ, Oppong KW et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary lesions and bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 656-664
  • 151 Manta R, Dabizzi E, Frazzoni M et al. Improvement of diagnostic yield by single operator peroral cholangioscopy (SpyGlass) in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures: a prospective cohort study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A15
  • 152 Canena J, Liberato M, Romão C et al. Predictive value of cholangioscopy after endoscopic management of post-surgical bile duct strictures with increasing number of plastic stents: a pilot study. Endoscopy 2012; 44-A5
  • 153 Scanzi J, Poincloux L, Pereira B et al. The placement of a pancreatic stent facilitated by intraductal injection of methylene blue decreases the risk of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic ampullectomy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A5
  • 154 Papanikolaou IS, Adler A, Neumann U et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic disease – its influence on surgical decision-making. An update 2008. Pancreatology 2009; 9: 55-65
  • 155 Chavalitdhamrong D, Draganov PV. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 491-497
  • 156 Hara K, Yamao K, Hijioka S et al. Prospective clinical study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy with direct metallic stent placement using a forward-viewing echoendoscope. Endoscopy 21. 01. 2013 [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326076.
  • 157 Burke DR, Lewis CA, Cardella JF et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1997; 8: 677-681
  • 158 Bapaye A, Aher A, Doiphode M et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary stenting (EUS-BS) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography guided internal biliary stenting (PTC-BS) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP due to an inaccessible papilla. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A21
  • 159 Isayama H, Kawakubo K, Kato H et al. Japanese multicenter experience of EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). Gut 2012; 61: A20
  • 160 Pesenti C, Bories E, Caillol F et al. Hepatico gastric anastomosis by EUS: use of partially covered stent GIOBOR (Tae Wong®). Endoscopy 2012; 44: A20
  • 161 Joshi N, Dhir V, Bhandari S et al. Comparison of intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic routes for EUS guided rendezvous procedure for distal CBD obstruction. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A21
  • 162 Walter D, Siersema PS, Vleggaar FP et al. A novel large-diameter metal stent, the AXIOS stent, for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of peripancreactic fluid collections: a multicenter experience. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A21
  • 163 De La Serna HigueraC, Ruiz-Zorrilla R, Gil P et al. Endoscopic-ultrasonographic (EUS)-guided transenteric gallbladder drainage with a new fistula-forming lumen-apposing metal stent. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A21
  • 164 Papanikolaou IS, Karatzas PS, Triantafyllou K et al. Role of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography in 2010. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2: 335-343
  • 165 Chopin-Laly X, Baraket O, Chirac P et al. Mural nodule does not predict malignant transformation in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN). Gut 2012; 61: A92
  • 166 Yamashita Y, Ueda K, Itonaga M et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for discriminating mural nodules from mucous clots in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: a single-center prospective study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A93
  • 167 Gheonea DI, Streba CT, Iordache S et al. Diagnostic value of combined quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography in pancreatic focal masses. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A93
  • 168 Iordache S, Costache M-I, Padureanu V et al. Power Doppler EUS in assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A93
  • 169 Tarantino I, Fabbri C, Di Mitri R et al. Complications of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration on pancreatic cystic lesion: final results from a large prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A94
  • 170 Jang JW, Lee SS, Park DH et al. EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage for symptomatic patients with pancreatic duct obstruction after failed transpapillary drainage; long-term follow-up results. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A93
  • 171 Anderloni A, Ballar M, Pagliarulo M et al. The role of early endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a triage test in suspected choledocholithiasis: final results of a prospective pilot study. Gut 2012; 61: A95
  • 172 De Angelis C, Marchio C, Pacchioni D et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of mediastinal, pancreatic and gastrointestinal lesions: fine needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) and sampling without aspiration (so-called “carotage”). Endoscopy 2012; 44: A261
  • 173 Cheong J, Kim G, Song G et al. Role of EUS in patients with elevated CA 19−9 level and negative abdominal CT findings. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A262
  • 174 Autorino R, Yakoubi R, White WM et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): where are we going? A bibliometric assessment. BJU Int 2013; 111: 11-16
  • 175 Aguilar V, Lorenzo S, Vila JJ et al. Hybrid-NOTES and EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy with a novel lumen-apposing metal stent. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A63
  • 176 Bok GH, Cho JY, Cha S-W et al. The comparison of laparoscopic wedge resection and hybrid NOTES in treatment of intraluminal growing subepithelial tumors. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A122
  • 177 Xu M-D, Yao L-Q, Zhou P-H et al. Advantages of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) with Hybrid Knife® over conventional electric knife for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from muscularis propria layer: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A101